Channel
@PavelTaruntaev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,188subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002051008738 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PavelTaruntaev |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PavelTaruntaev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 1,188 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 1,185 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 1,184 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 1,184 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,423 |
| Reactions total | 231 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
231 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 81 | 35.1% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 22.1% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 21.6% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 7.36% | |
| 🙈 | 7 | 3.03% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.60% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.16% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 1.30% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.30% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.866% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.866% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.866% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.433% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.433% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚜 Ехал с тренировки, думал о великом и задумался вот о чем: а когда вообще родителям думать о воспитании? Не посадишь же себя вечером на диван со словами: «Так, с 19:30 до 20:00 буду размышлять, как реагировать на истерики». Поэтому надо приучить себя гонять мысли не только о кружках, друзьях и работе, но и родительстве за рулем, в душе, на пробежке, пока гуляете с собакой или беседуете за вечерним пивом чаем 👍 Пот…
❤8🔥4👍3💯2👏1
🔥 Набор фраз с пояснениями к семи типичным ситуациям, когда вы противостоите натиску требований ребенка. Поднять щиты! У меня есть решение! 00:03 — Ну, еще пя-я-ять минуточе-е-ек! 00:06 — Проблема современных родителей: бесконечное нытье и его финал 00:27 — Почему дальше можно не слушать и как изменить финал? 00:58 — Главный принцип и три его части 01:06 — Первая часть 01:12 — Вторая часть 01:18 — Третья часть 01:38…
🔥10👍6❤2👏2
Британские ученые доказали: во время истерики ребенок орет 🤘 А вот американские ученые пошли чуть дальше: записали десятки детских истерик на микрофоны и выяснили неожиданную вещь. Долгое время считалось, что ребенок сначала злится, а потом плачет, но оказалось, что эти эмоции живут одновременно 💯 Злость накрывает короткими всплесками, а грусть все это время остается фоном, поэтому ребенок в истерике может одноврем…
👍7❤2👏2⚡1🔥1
Истерика — это сначала злость, потом слезы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🙂 Есть люди, работать с которыми — настоящее удовольствие. Одна из них Муза Князева, один из лидеров сети детских садов и школ Sun School. У нее прекрасный детский сад в Сколково, и я всегда рад любому поводу для совместной работы. Нас объединяет многое: мы близки по ценностям, и наши профессии тоже пересекаются, потому что Муза не только руководитель, но и сертифицированный подростковый коуч. Она помогает ребятам с…
❤7👍7🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5
Ура, ура, наконец-то мы это сделали! Записали подкаст вместе с Павлом Тарунтаевым, кандидатом психологических наук, ведущим психологом сети детских садов Sun School. Мне давно хотелось поговорить с ним о наших прекрасных подростках, о взаимодействии с ними с точки зрения психологии и коучинга. Мы поговорили на самые животрепещущие темы, которые волнуют всех родителей подростков. Как работает психолог с подростками…
❤5👏3🔥3👍2🙏1
жпт x тарунтаев когда коллаборация помогает доносить мысль проще 🔥 Я в МАХ Я в ВК
🔥6❤4👏3🤩3👌2👍1🥰1
Мои пять копеек: если вас оскорбляет каждый стереотип, жить будет очень тяжело, потому что стереотипы были, есть и будут. Наш мозг вообще любит упрощать мир 😊 Ненормально, когда человек перестает видеть разницу между стереотипом и конкретным человеком, а в комментариях такие есть экземпляры и даже среди критиков. ⚡️ Мы учим детей: не все бабушки одинаковые, не все мальчики дерутся, не все подростки грубые и не все …
🔥6❤4👍3💯3👏1
😍 Психолог смотрит мультики. «Три богатыря и Шамаханская царица» Возраст: от 6 лет, желательно с обсуждением На первый взгляд это обычная история: царица хочет вернуть себе молодость, крутит роман с Князем, а богатыри в очередной раз спасают Киев. Но под приключенческим сюжетом спрятан психологический пласт, который большинство детей самостоятельно не считывают, поэтому мультфильм хорош не сам по себе, а как повод …
🔥9👍6❤4👏2
А как давно фанаты тяжелой музыки и аниме занимаются преступностью? 🧐
🗿3🙈2
В Петербурге пройдут рейды по ТЦ в поисках неформалов. По данным СМИ, сотрудники Центра «Э» будут искать участников «асоциальных группировок» по одежде и аксессуарам. Повод — рост подростковой преступности на 26% за полугодие 📢 Не грузит фото и видео? Переходи в наш МАХ
🙈5💊2🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @PavelTaruntaev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Истерика — это сначала злость, потом слезы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 252,755 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Детский психолог Павел Тарунтаев” (@PavelTaruntaev), 1,188 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PavelTaruntaev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.