Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Русский Ресейл

@sickandlow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,455subscribers

+57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001724540363
TypeChannel
Username@sickandlow
DescriptionТот, который произошёл youtube.com/sicklow Чат комментариев и обсуждений здесь: https://t.me/+QjN6x0qRsBw2NDg6 Мерч здесь: https://exhaustwear.ru/catalog/kollaboraciya-sick-and-low-x-exhaust Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3RkPvh
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sickandlow

Growth

14,39514,45514,4256 August 2026 — 14,398 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,398 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,396 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,395 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,406 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,403 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,417 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,444 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,455 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,386–14,464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:3614,455+11
12 Aug 2026, 07:0214,444+27
11 Aug 2026, 03:5114,417+14
10 Aug 2026, 02:4114,403-3
8 Aug 2026, 23:3614,406+11
8 Aug 2026, 00:2314,395-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:1014,396-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:0014,398no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:4914,398first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 14,455 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,070
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held16 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total49,090
Reactions total1,845
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,480
Videos
329
Links
244

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,845 reactions across 16 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
74740.5%
🔥29415.9%
❤‍🔥26314.3%
👍21311.5%
💅804.34%
🌭693.74%
custom 5256240290343164789603.25%
🎉402.17%
👎150.813%
😍120.65%
🤩100.542%
🤡90.488%
😭70.379%
🍾40.217%
💊40.217%
🥰40.217%
🤔30.163%
🤯30.163%
💘20.108%
😁20.108%
4 further kinds40.217%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,845reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sickandlow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,190 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ко мне тут, кстати, посылка одна занимательная прикатила. Жаль только журнал по дебюту кариновского 3T-GTEU прошляпил, но постараемся наверстать упущенное. Кстати, на обложке Сонни Чиба — спустя время он сыграет Хаттори Ханзо в Тарантиновском «Убить Билла».

🔥37🌭2👍1

14 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC≈2,240 views119 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Че скажете за этот дедов сарай?

98❤‍🔥13🌭7👍1

14 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,640 views56 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ремни на опознание

👍465🤔3🌭2

13 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈3,400 views106 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

‘81 ВАЗ-2102, 61 тыс. км Приятная двойка на полном ходу. Небазный советский учет (специально проверял базность, поэтому паркинг и камеры — free). Кузов хороший, красился не лучшим образом, желательно освежить. По низам когда-то что-то варилось, все обработано антикорром. Много нового по ходовой части. Родной 1.2 на 4-ех ступе, работает нормально, бесконтактное зажигание, новый генератор, регулятор напряжения. Нужно

80🔥11😭7👍6🌭1👎1

12 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC≈3,520 views219 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

У админа сегодня др 🎉 Смотрите, как он задумался о пережитом. И лучшим подарком для него будет, если вы сделаете подгон себе самому в виде нашего мерча 😉

❤‍🔥146🎉40👍18🌭4🍾42😍2👎1

11 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC≈4,350 views163 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, пришла пора расставаться с жемчужиной коллекции… ‘07 ГАЗ-31105-801 «Волга» (рестайлинг, ЗМЗ-406) с пробегом 44 тыс. км 2 владельца: 1-ый — дед до 2023, 2-ой — я сам. Цвет: авантюрин (темно-синий металлик). Полностью родное ЛКП, заводской антикор Mercasol, были устранены несколько мелких вмятин по кузову методом PDR, на левом заднем крыле остались пара царапин и трещина на решетке радиатора, все стекла и хро

👍84🔥26custom 525624029034316478924🤡9❤‍🔥7💊43🌭2

11 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈3,180 views119 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

С добрым утром, товарищи!

💅80👍23🔥102🌭2👎2

10 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈3,360 views103 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Чего-то определенно не хватает

79🌭13👍6🔥4👎1

9 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈3,780 views127 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Естественно, как мы уехали с ДВ, сразу все повсплывало. Но мы не унываем, а покупаем! К нашей Альтушке в Мск уже едет подружка Карина в «женском» исполнении Jeune, чьей особенностью является…кто угадает (подсказка на заднем бампере)? В голове не укладывается — и это в 83-ем году!

🔥105❤‍🔥8🌭53🤯3👍2👎1

8 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC≈3,660 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, ресейл намечается. Добрых снов ✨

117👍10🌭2👎1

7 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈3,300 views127 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А на самом деле, мы уже ровно неделю как вернулись в Мск. Встречу организовать не получилось ввиду погодных условий в последний день, но думаю, что это далеко не последний визит, так что еще успеется. Всем приятной пятницы, а Дальнему Востоку отдельное спасибо за приключения и теплый приём 🙌

97custom 525624029034316478911🤩8😍5👍3🌭1👎1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈3,270 views114 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Еще у него есть Хайс в фарше, купленный по нынешним меркам за копейки, которому нужен донор электронной приборки (дед всрал в нее стрелочные приборы температуры и топлива). Может у кого из вас/знакомых завалялась подобная?

78custom 525624029034316478918🌭9🔥2👍1👎1💘1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sickandlow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 483,748 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Полигон 98
@polygon_98 · 113,599
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Русский Ресейл” (@sickandlow), 14,455 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sickandlow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.