Channel
@ee66iopnn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,379subscribers
-132 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002491512284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ee66iopnn |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ee66iopnn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 4,379 | -44 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 4,423 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 4,437 | -38 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 4,475 | -36 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 4,511 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 4,511 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (31 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,432 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名： Looking 上课时间：8.7 老师花名：#洋洋 位置坐标：#龙华 上课花费：1300pp 出击体验：终于见到心心念念的洋洋宝宝，听从指挥上楼。一进门就瞄上若隐若现的奶子，白嫩白嫩的，摸着很柔软，身形很苗条，不胖不瘦。 她拉着去洗澡，边洗边色色的抚摸鸡巴，来到床上之后，老师亲吻我的乳头，吞吐我的鸡巴。老师的嘴上技术好强啊，含进去的那一霎那，真tm爽。我遇见口活最好的！随后就是做爱，先用传统体位，老师知道我喜欢🐻，还让我一边操一边双手摸着她的🐻，随后的后入式也是一边草一边摸着老师的🐻，女上位的姿势就更爽了，还能一边草一边抓着🐻。就这样沉醉在诱人氛围中，我很快射了。第二次做爱的时候，我还把老师顶在墙上不断操，也是不断摸着她的🐻。这次真的太值了！ 身材完美，热情粘人，情绪价值拉满，骚的不像话，感觉要是睡一晚上，要被老师榨干，身材苗条奶子大，态度良好口活超好。…
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：谭师傅 上课时间：8.7 老师花名：蜜桃乌龙茶 位置坐标：#光明 上课花费：1300PP 出击体验：好久没有出来上课了，点进老师频道看到一些视频很有感觉立马联系，约了时间开车出发。停车很方便可以直接上楼，课室环境很好，干净整洁，第一眼看到老师感觉没白跑，人照9成，人比照片好看，身材很顶，胸也大。进门老师给我拿了拖鞋，付了课费我去洗澡。因为太久没出来上课了第一发快速被缴械，不得不赞叹老师的技巧，服务也不错，课表上该有的都有，休息时间老师很会聊天，聊了些有趣的事，过后老师主动调情，手也不自觉地游动起来，然后口，口的很认真，正戏开始桩了几分钟听着老师浪叫声，还有臀浪，完全放弃抵抗直接交代了。下次还会来，推荐 优点缺点： 大胸年轻，皮肤滑滑的，鲍鱼很好看哦 推荐程度：推荐 联系方式：https://t.me/lpoj5 温馨提醒：报告仅供参考，请理性选择，切勿对号入座
❤1
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：lll文 上课时间：8.4 老师花名：#小茹 位置坐标：#光明 上课花费：600/p 出击体验：推开门那一刹那， 小茹老师那对大灯真是亮瞎我了，又挺又大，上床后验证是自然大奶，交了水费后，抱着老师这大灯啃了2-3分钟， 这胸太美了，又饱满又挺，感觉太棒，然后就是老师给我口，口活也很棒 ，看着老师的美胸 ，爽死我了，硬了之后，戴套直接女上进攻，老师很配合，叫声轻声细语，摇了几分钟换传教士由我开始主导，后面就是一顿操作猛如虎，一边揉8一边冲刺，老师反应真实，我时而高频拍插，随着老师的喘息声一我一下子交枪了。抱着老师温存了一下下时间，洗澡成功撤退，非常开心的一次出击。 优点缺点：10分 推荐程度：10分 联系方式：@xianh3 温馨提醒：报告仅供参考，请理性选择，切勿对号入座
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：A老驴 上课时间：8-5 老师花名：瑶瑶 位置坐标：#龙岗 上课花费：700 出击体验：这段时间突然就来一场雨，总是阴晴不定的，越是这样的天气，越是要对自己好一点！这不，今天长途跋涉去找老师！😍😍 老师身材真的顶，瘦底大波小蛮腰！😳😳颜值也是可以的，人照9分！但瑕不掩瑜，这身材，这价格，还要什么自行车！😏😏 进房后，交了水费开始帮洗，老师有C🐻，还有那双修长的美腿，我已经忍不住上下其手了😂😂尽管我在动手动脚，老师还是认真的帮洗，水中萧很舒服，🐔儿被她洗得干干净净！洗完出来还主动帮我擦干身体，还是挺友好的！ 她先是用🐻给🐔儿来个波推，然后一路推上来，加入经典舔🐻，再一路往回游走，舔一下🐔儿，然后整根含住，整个流程一气呵成！😌😌御姐果然比嫩妹会啊！ 就这样一直吹着，口技确实了得，不喊停都不停！ 吹了好几分钟后，🐔儿硬得不行了，示意老师戴上小雨衣坐上来，进入一瞬间，感觉…
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：房祖炼 上课时间：8.5 老师花名：#依依 位置坐标：#龙华 上课花费：1300/2课 出击体验：看了老师的频道，今天有空果断出击联系，约好了时间到了发的位置后，一开门人比照片好看，老师很温柔，身材前凸后翘，很符合我的胃口，交了水费就去洗澡了，水中消特别舒服，洗完澡开始服务，皮肤很光滑，大长腿，口活很厉害，深喉特别牛逼，每一个服务都十分舒服，幻想体验的感觉在这里体验到，太爽了！对太多的细节就不细说了，只能自己亲身体验才行，可以放心冲， 推荐程度：推荐 联系方式：https://t.me/xvbbcfggf 温馨提醒：报告仅供参考，请理性选择，切勿对号入座https://t.me/yiyil05
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：cuo din 上课时间：8/4 老师花名：雯雯 位置坐标：龙岗 上课花费：800 出击体验：今天不用上班闲来无事，饥渴难耐，随即找老师出击。看了看榜单，觉得老师很合眼缘，于是果断邀约。课室位置十分好找，十分便捷。 一开门，映入眼帘的就是漂亮的脸庞和呼之欲出的奶子形成了强烈的反差，小帐篷直接高高搭起。 老师很主动热情，就想认识很久的男女朋友一样随意自然，亲亲抱抱摸摸完全不在话下。老师的皮肤很好，摸起来很滑，身上没什么赘肉，很紧致。深喉都很真卖力。躺着享受就行，来兴致了还可以自己操盘，都很配合。 老师很有礼貌，情绪价值给足，那种萝莉御姐的感觉同时在一个人身上提现，服务前老师还会很温柔的询问敏感点，进行沟通需要什么样的服务，服务周到，把学生真正的做到了放在心上。总之这个价位性价比可以的。 优点缺点： 又嫩又欲 推荐程度：约过这么多可心算是服务态度最好的了，不催钟，有耐…
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：董箐 上课时间：8.4 老师花名：阳阳 位置坐标：#光明 上课花费：700 出击体验：看了老师的频道，今天有空果断出击联系，约好了时间到了发的位置后，一开门人比照片好看，老师很温柔，身材前凸后翘，很符合我的胃口，交了水费就去洗澡了，水中消特别舒服，洗完澡开始服务，皮肤很光滑，大长腿，口活很厉害，深喉特别牛逼，每一个服务都十分舒服，幻想体验的感觉在这里体验到，太爽了！对太多的细节就不细说了，只能自己亲身体验才行，可以放心冲， 优点缺点： 前凸后翘 推荐程度：推广 联系方式：https://t.me/bhvgng 温馨提醒：报告仅供参考，请理性选择，切勿对号入座
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：吾梦 吾梦 上课时间：8月4日 老师花名：#曼莎 位置坐标：#福田 上课花费：1300PP 出击体验：跟老师预约好时间，准时抵达。进门看到老师，还是有点紧张的。进门交了水费，就和老师进去洗洗了，老师给我洗的很仔细，还给我口了一下，洗完就躺着享受老师服务了。然后就品尝了一下老师鲍鱼，老师比较敏感下面，水水多我也是舔过瘾了，还有手指摸了一下老师的鲍鱼。最后在老师服务下忍不住出水了。休息了一会儿，就开始第二次服务了，然后在一阵努力下成功出水，一次很好的出击之旅。 优点缺点： 粉嫩的小穴很紧很多水 推荐程度：推荐 联系方式：https://t.me/wkld3 温馨提醒：报告仅供参考，请理性选择，切勿对号入座
❤2
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：来哥 上课时间：8.2 老师花名：#可欣 位置坐标：#福田 上课花费：700p 颜值身材：真人和照片9分像；肤色白 服务内容：课表有的都有 出击体验：闲来无聊，打开TG找老师约炮。刚好看见老师上榜照片看起来很入我的心，问好老师位置刚好就在我附近果断约好时间。到了指定地点遥控上楼，老师打开房间一眼望去，微笑的脸庞很舒服走进房门废话不多说老师脱光光皮肤白嫩s身材一起共浴，小弟弟不听使唤，一柱擎天洗好澡澡老师拉我进入我们战斗的地点，ab面都有服务，奶子波推，舌尖漫游，海底捞月，洗奶，耳边风，舌吻，舔来舔去口吹小弟弟差点儿不争气就发出子弹。带上套套女上桩机，换我后入抓奶姿势结束战斗。总体来说，这次体验不错，老师颜值高。不催客皮肤白嫩光滑 优点缺点：大个漂亮宝 推荐程度：会常来 联系方式：@sbnre1
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：黄艺 上课时间：8/3 老师花名：美美 位置坐标：#龙岗 上课花费：1300 出击体验：今天来约美美老师，进入房间老师换上拖鞋，随后洗澡，洗完老师帮忙擦干，然后服务，口的十分卖力，没有齿感，是真的爽，还用力顶了两次深喉。忍受不了老师的口活，带上雨伞开工，女上位进入直插，感觉老师有点受不了，但哪能饶了老师，一顿疯狂输出变化各个姿势，伴随阵阵呻吟交货一课，休息片刻和老师洗了澡，接着躺在床上休息，顺势拥入怀中，一波调情后，翻身将老师压在身下，舔舔老师的奶头，很快老师就奶头坚硬，随即让老师趁热打铁口了口，第二课体力有限，变换了两个姿势准备冲刺交货，谁知老师突然高潮抽动还一把推开了我，那画面不要太美妙了，也是第一次把老师干高潮了，而且是完全真实的感觉，随即一顿输出交货，趁着小弟还硬又抽插了几次，深深顶入老师身体，很不错的体验。 优点缺点：身材不错，够骚，口活非常不错 推荐程…
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：mu ang 上课时间：8/2 老师花名：依依 位置坐标：#龙华 上课花费：700 出击体验：约好了依依老师直接驱车赶来，本人好看，会更有感觉一点，个人观点，比较喜欢健康美那种，老师很喜欢笑，一进门就一直笑脸服务，冲这一点好评，接下来就是身材服务这一块，简单几句直接验牌，有料，一起洗浴了，老师的大奶子真的手感十足，是属于那种恰到好处的！洗澡帮我口的时候特别有感觉，差点没忍住交代了！一阵酥麻！立马制止，跟老师上战场，老师先是简单的服务后，我就叫老师直接进入正题，口口硬了带上套套，先是老师上位，一顿输出，悬空出入抽出，老师很配合！做累了老师侧方位再是一顿出入，叫声也是迷人，最后以后入的方式结束了战斗！整个过程老师都非常配合没有一点不悦，毕竟本狼也是素质🐺很愉快的一次出击，交货简单家常几句溜之大吉！ 优点缺点： 大胸，服务好，姿势配合 推荐程度：9.9推荐 联系方式：h…
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：瓜子仁 上课时间：8/2 老师花名：#小豆豆 位置坐标：#宝安 上课花费：700p 颜值身材：人美，人照九分 服务内容：课表一致 出击体验：群里刷到新人开课，遂当第一个吃肉的人，来到老师课室，见到本尊确认不是雷，到了后脱了进去洗澡，帮我冲洗干净，回房间躺在床上，主动亲两点，然后逐渐往下亲，一口含住整根，无齿感，我提出69，老师便把屁屁伸过来，我一顿舌头探索嗦，嗦得老师一抖，69到饱，提出带伞女上，老师的体力不错，在上面摇了很久，想盯着老师的眼睛，但老师比较害羞不敢直视，然后换后入，屁股撅得很高，很爱这撞击屁股的感觉，在一顿撞击中有了想射的感觉，便提出传教，一顿猛干出水。女友感十足，很爱，还会继续返！！！ 优点缺点：整体氛围轻松。姐姐属于成熟型，态度好，有耐心，体验感佳，值得推荐。 推荐程度：我会推荐 联系方式：@otlsqq
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ee66iopnn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 3,787 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳资源修车🚙 验证报告🫰🫰” (@ee66iopnn), 4,379 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ee66iopnn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.