Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 宝安💋玲玲🈳🌹👙

Channel

宝安💋玲玲🈳🌹👙

@jbaoan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

489subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003092972749
TypeChannel
Username@jbaoan
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jbaoan

Growth

4895235067 August 2026 — 523 subscribers8 August 2026 — 523 subscribers8 August 2026 — 511 subscribers15 August 2026 — 489 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 484–528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:53489-22
8 Aug 2026, 16:28511-12
8 Aug 2026, 04:02523no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:17523first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.0%
avg views ÷ 489 subscribers
Avg views / post
147
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,320
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC104 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lkzhyd

【验证报告】: https://t.me/lkzhyd 【验证留名】:激情的枫 【上课时间】: 8-1 【老师花名】:#玲玲 【位置坐标】:#宝安 【上课费用】:700 【服务内容】:课表 【出击体验】:妹子特有的优点嗲说话特温柔,进门含蓄了一会就去洗澡,洗澡时服务就开始了,用胸摩擦我全身先前面在后面非常爽,弟弟马上就有反应,硬的不行了然后老师蹲下帮我吹,差点都要交枪,洗完后老师帮我擦干,然后上床了开始服务老师舌头特软舔的很有感觉,马上就受不了了,老师也很敏感,水特多,一下就去了在里面特有感觉,后面的事情大家可以脑补一下一个字爽 【优点缺点】:真人和照片9分像 身材凹凸有致,一对白兔 🐇 呼之欲出 【推荐程度】:热情主动,年龄真实

24 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC263 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @qingloucjbg

出击报告:https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名:阿爆 上课时间:7/24 老师花名:#玲玲 位置坐标:#宝安 上课花费:1400/2pp 服务内容:课内服务 出击体验:观望ls几天了,喜欢这类,周五闲来无事约ls赴约,遥控指挥上楼,ls开门,热情迎接,会问渴不渴,要不要喝水,主动递鞋,闲聊一会儿,果断交完水费,闲话不说,脱衣洗澡,ls帮擦,角角落落擦干,b面躺好,过水吸皮,有一说一,舌头真灵活,上下游走,屁股一拍,撅起dl,那叫一个酸爽,蛋蛋都被照顾到,ls认真,不叫不停,翻身a面,香舌送上,两个字柔软,三点口,口活超绝,sh到底,一起一伏上下套弄,硬到不行,穿衣上马,女上,直接滑入,没想ls已如此湿润,骑行,翻身cjs猛冲猛顶许久,ls双眼迷离,拉起登起,拉到镜前后入观赏,又返床上跪式,这时ls发力了,大蟒蛇明显感受到了阻力,剐蹭感,在一声声宝宝声中爽死,许久发射,ls又温柔清理,洗澡,服务型嫩妹,性价比

15 Jul 2026, 03:52 UTC370 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ee66iopnn

出击报告:https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名:奥飞 上课时间:7.14 老师花名:#玲玲 位置坐标:#宝安 上课花费:700 出击体验:今天直接约了玲玲,一进门就被她那双又长又细的白腿吸引住,瘦小身材却骚得要命。 洗澡时她跪下来给我口,吸得又湿又深。上床后69舔得我爽翻,下面又紧又多水,夹得我鸡巴发疼。后入抓着她细腰猛干,她虽然叫声不大,但小穴一直收缩吸着我,干得特别过瘾。700p玩得挺爽,长腿细腰+紧致小穴,值得一试。 优点缺点: 腿长腰细,下面紧会夹 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/jbaoan 温馨提醒:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jbaoan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 78,141 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“宝安💋玲玲🈳🌹👙” (@jbaoan), 489 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jbaoan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.