Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 罗湖🌷楚楚(个人兼职)💥

Channel

罗湖🌷楚楚(个人兼职)💥

@xiaoyuo5

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,949subscribers

-554 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002122603013
TypeChannel
Username@xiaoyuo5
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xiaoyuo5

Growth

1,9492,5032,2267 August 2026 — 2,503 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,477 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,282 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,078 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,949 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -554. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,866–2,586 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:441,949-129
14 Aug 2026, 20:272,078-204
11 Aug 2026, 06:062,282-195
8 Aug 2026, 05:582,477-26
7 Aug 2026, 18:182,503first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 20 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.82%
avg views ÷ 1,949 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held15 (20 March 20265 August 2026)
Views total94
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2346.0%
👍1530.0%
🥰612.0%
🔥510.0%
🌭12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 03:26 UTC94 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ycfah

出击报告:https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名:xiao dong 上课时间:8.4 老师花名:楚楚 位置坐标:#罗湖 上课花费:600/P 出击体验:今日下班闲着无事,闲着也是无聊,上✈️刷到了楚楚老师。约好时间准时到达。ls轻车路熟,迅速清洗,操作,老弟也有起色,重点照顾胸和腿,胸nice,腿也自在,太有样子了,臀背精致!还是我喜欢的,躺下和老师69,没有异味,老师叫的声音很好听,然后就是传统姿势,随着时间流逝去中出了,好评。 优点缺点: 很嫩,年轻 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/xiaoyuo5 温馨提醒:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座

1

18 Jul 2026, 03:58 UTC605 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @qingloucjbg

出击报告:https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名:老白孟 上课时间:7.17 老师花名:楚楚 位置坐标:#罗湖 上课花费:600/P 服务内容:课表 出击体验:妹妹很漂亮,白白嫩嫩的,本人比照片好看,很热情,根据指引来到教室,进门后老师打招呼、拿水给我喝,然后坐下来果断交了水费,然后简单冲洗之后回到房间开始,很贴心的说如果需要配合什么可以提前说,然后就是正常开始,老师的口活很好,很舒服,舔🥚更是刺激,然后就是正常开始做,非常水润,小穴很紧,换了两三个姿势之后 后入顺利出水,结束后还会问你要不要一起洗,然后穿衣服的时候也还会给你倒水跟你聊天,整体有女友感,而且本人确实很漂亮。 优点缺点:皮肤滑嫩,不催,热情漂亮,性感 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/xiaoyuo5

1👍1🔥1

2 Jul 2026, 05:10 UTC890 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ghfndd

🍑桃园🍑 https://t.me/ghfndd # 楚楚 #深圳罗湖 出击体验:导航定位进门,进门先陪洗,妹妹身材曲线苗条勾魂。笑起来媚眼如丝,随后赤裸相拥,妹妹沾着沐浴露抱着我慢慢清洗。忍不住赶紧亲上,柔软湿润,舌尖交缠。随后上床服务,服务很不错啊,然后妹妹来到我两腿之间,继续口,口的过程中会有魅惑的眼神投来,然后开始口活,感觉酥酥麻麻很舒服,能感觉到妹妹舌头的包裹感很棒。干前我提出先主动一下,妹妹躺下,我把妹妹从头舔到腿,最后一直吃胸,妹妹敏感的水汪汪了。后面就是开大,传教起手,侧入继续,随后女上妹妹一会摇摇车,一会跪起,我一边两手放在妹妹胸上轻柔揉,一边欣赏妹妹舔嘴唇咬嘴唇的表情,太满足了。然后后入干了一会,最后换回传教,看着妹妹绝美的面庞及享受的表情 爽飞了。 联系方式:https://t.me/xiaoyuo5 双向:@lhchuchubot

1👍1🥰1

21 Jun 2026, 04:51 UTC975 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lkzhyd

【验证报告】: https://t.me/lkzhyd 【验证留名】:Ortal M 【上课时间】:6-20 【老师花名】:楚楚 【位置坐标】:#罗湖 【上课费用】:600/P 【服务内容】:课表 【出击体验】:留意老师有一段时间了,后面看群里大佬都说评价不错,随约时间 cj,开门一见人照8成,真的很不错,颜值是我喜欢的类型,气质很好,立马交学费上课,老师帮洗时的态度很好,温柔细心,洗完帮擦干后先上床躺着,老师上来就从咪咪开始攻略,舌头相当灵活,被老师口是一种享受,口的相当认真,口的时候还有娇喘声,时间也足够,后面就是老师先女上,这腰力,不得不说是很享受的一次性爱,差点忍不住,换了传教士,继续耕耘,出货,最后也在老师的陪洗下结束这次愉快的

🔥21👍1

8 Jun 2026, 05:22 UTC≈1,080 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ee66iopnn

出击报告:https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名:天骄 三代 上课时间:6-7 老师花名:#楚楚 位置坐标:#罗湖 上课花费:600/P 出击体验:无聊在电报看到老师的报告,感觉是自己喜欢的,于是约了时间,过去看到老师没怎么化妆,但是气质还是挺好,身材也很好,比例匀称,属于那种看着舒服、相处起来也不会有距离感的类型。慢慢气氛就放松下来了。随后陪洗,直接来到床上,老师开始服务,从上到下舔一遍,真踏马嫩啊,没有齿感,确实有点东西。几番操作下来,确实受不了,直接就女上起手,进入就感觉下面好烫,感觉是真的爽,然后换我正面冲击,过程能感觉到紧致的包裹感,每抽插一下都能感觉到老师的强烈的反馈,老师双手抱紧我越来越紧,下面也猛烈的迎合着我,突然我感觉老师好像要比我先高潮,然后在我猛烈的冲击下一起进入了高潮。事后老师气喘吁吁,真是捡到宝了 这么嫩,在离别的时候老师拥抱着我给我一个拥报,像极了出门跟女朋友的离别。喜欢颜值 女友范的

2👍1🥰1

27 May 2026, 04:34 UTC≈1,100 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ycfah

出击报告:https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名:秦 皇 上课时间:5.26 老师花名:楚楚 位置坐标:#罗湖 上课花费:1200PP 出击体验:位置导航到楼下,遥控上楼,一进门映入眼帘的吊带裙,弟弟一下子就硬了,老师人照9分,皮肤白,本来抱着试一试的心态过来的,看到老师直接来了个PP,老师帮忙洗澡洗的很到位,然后就是调情环节,在我身上漫游,舌头很棒,舔的我身体酥麻,69互动,让人欲罢不能啊,啪啪啪的时候也是超级配合,超级有女友的感觉,大长腿穿上丝袜加小翘臀后入,在老师骚气的呻吟中,疯狂抽插,最后交货,非常满意。 优点缺点: 年轻貌美,颜值不低,三点粉嫩 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/xiaoyuo5 温馨提醒:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座

2👍1

19 May 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,040 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

单身的我拥有情绪自由的权利🙉

1👍1🥰1

16 May 2026, 03:50 UTC≈1,060 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1👍1

2 May 2026, 05:04 UTC≈1,370 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @qingloucjbg

出击报告:https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名:顶级男技师 上课时间:5月1号 老师花名:楚楚 位置坐标:#罗湖 上课花费:600/P 服务内容:课表 出击体验:课室安全,然后做沙发上交谈甚久,人也比较开朗,相处很愉快。然后就去洗澡,奈奈挺大的,皮肤滑嫩,口没有齿感很舒服,洗完后到床上,也不停的调情,弟弟没忍住站了起来,于是直接带t深入交流,传教士,后入,搞了一小会儿,然后女上,女生太猛,被桩了,反正整个过程,体验很好的,下次必回锅。 优点缺点:天然胸,口活好,三点粉嫩 , 小穴紧水多。 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/xiaoyuo5

3👍1🔥1

26 Apr 2026, 05:28 UTC≈1,250 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

你的小可爱开课了💕💕💕💕💕

3👍1🥰1

13 Apr 2026, 04:45 UTC≈1,370 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ghfndd

🍑桃园🍑 https://t.me/ghfndd # 楚楚#深圳罗湖 出击体验:老师很嫩,略施粉黛,甚至比照片好看。干的时候,老师放下头发更好看,比想象中的要完美,比正常肤色稍微白一点,小妹妹很润很热,比较健谈不会让人尴尬。全程贴心服务不玩手机不催钟不划水,性格特好,主动陪洗,全自动鸳鸯浴。到了床上贴心服饰,开始舌吻 然后从上舔舔到下,继续展示口活,不是一般人真顶不住这个口活,嘴巴内还带有马达震动效果,整的下体酥酥麻麻的惊的我把腿收了收,然后各种姿势啪啪啪,全程呼应你的要求,干的我满头大汗,楚楚老师也没有任何埋怨,非常配合,必须点个赞。完事后又聊了很久,性格很开朗不急的催人,连事后洗浴都全程陪同,服务极好的嫩妹。 联系方式:@brktcxj 双向:@lhchuchubot

👍21🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @xiaoyuo5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 195,369 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“罗湖🌷楚楚(个人兼职)💥” (@xiaoyuo5), 1,949 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaoyuo5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.