Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 冰冰👑龙华🈶🏡🏠

Channel

冰冰👑龙华🈶🏡🏠

@binbsz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,308subscribers

-928 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003992661327
TypeChannel
Username@binbsz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 5 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/binbsz

Growth

2,3083,2362,7727 August 2026 — 3,236 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,218 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,856 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,558 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,308 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -928. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,169–3,375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 00:432,308-250
14 Aug 2026, 16:472,558-298
11 Aug 2026, 03:522,856-362
8 Aug 2026, 01:203,218-18
7 Aug 2026, 18:183,236first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 2,308 subscribers
Avg views / post
290
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.862%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (5 May 20263 August 2026)
Views total580
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2543.1%
👍1831.0%
🥰915.5%
🔥58.62%
🎉11.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC153 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lkzhyd

【验证报告】: https://t.me/lkzhyd 【验证留名】:张浩白 【上课时间】:8月2日 【老师花名】:冰冰 【位置坐标】:#龙华 【上课费用】:800/P 【服务内容】:课表 【出击体验】:跟老师约好时间直达来到楼下,遥控上楼没有门禁,进门老师热情迎接主动递水,在沙发上坐了一会交了水费就去洗澡,前后洗了个遍,最后还用那对奶子和屁股蹭,洗完仔细帮我擦干。随后上床趴下开始服务,B面从上到下舔了个遍,360度口,老师口活真的太棒了没一点齿感,太爽了差点缴枪。服务时间长一点不敷衍。随后戴套开干,正面猛攻一会交货。本L出击多年冰冰老师是我遇到服务最好的老师了,找时间继续cj。 【优点缺点】:热情主动 服务全面姿势各种配合 【推荐程度】

1👍1

20 Jul 2026, 03:21 UTC427 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ee66iopnn

出击报告:https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名:土木工程李生 上课时间:7月19号 老师花名:冰冰 位置坐标:#龙华 上课花费:800/P 出击体验:加购物车好久了一直没有机会,毕竟冰冰老师哪都好,就是自己没有空,刚好周六休息有空,成功预约上了时间和要了定位,定位准确,准时达到后遥控上楼,在门后见到了老师,人照9成以上,本人颜值比照片好看,嫩妹一枚,目测身高165左右,进门打了声招呼后便在沙发上坐了下来,浅浅聊了下便赶紧把水费交了便脱衣服一起洗浴,肤白滑嫩,胸D,身材苗条无赘肉,看的心花怒放,二弟都已然起立,随后一起进浴室洗浴,洗的也很细致,洗完擦干后上床便开始服务,随后向下舔胸及六九,毛量正常已刮,鲍鱼小蝴蝶形很粉嫩,69无异味,由于养胃有点久了,此时早已按耐不住,便让老师开始服务,口活还可以的,待差不多便戴伞女上起手,包裹感明显,待老师累了换我开始传教士姿势,后入比较有感觉还偏紧,由于养胃有点久敏感,后入没

1🎉1👍1

8 Jul 2026, 04:38 UTC573 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2️⃣套,超喜欢的紫色套装👙

1👍1🥰1

3 Jul 2026, 05:09 UTC699 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ycfah

出击报告:https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名:zheng li 上课时间:7月2号 老师花名:冰冰 位置坐标:#龙华 上课花费:800/P 出击体验:一开始就有关注冰冰老师,高颜值大长腿这样的评价难免让我心动,加购物车也挺久了,终究还是去了。冰冰老师课室房间没有昏暗的灯光,也没有廉价的香水味!就穿了套居家睡衣,就好像回家一样,也蛮健谈由于房间比较小,就没有一起洗,洗完上楼,冰冰老师应我要求,穿了个开档情趣丝袜,然后她过来服务:先温柔口,舌尖绕着转技术细腻又带撩,腿都给我舔软了;接着上位,她自己控节奏,胸前晃啊晃,眼神一直看着我,甜度犯规;换传教士垫枕头,角度完美,里面又紧又热,带着娇喘声,几下就让我头皮发麻;推车她腿抬高配合得特别好;最后后入,她趴着翘起,曲线太绝,我一边动一边摸她腰和臀,把丝袜撕开,猛冲几下直接出水,两眼一黑差点当场晕过去,爽到灵魂出窍! 优点缺点: 人照8成,偏嫩妹,妆容挺好看的,态度好 推荐程度

3👍2🥰1

20 Jun 2026, 07:07 UTC793 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @qingloucjbg

出击报告:https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名:vin Ke 上课时间:6-19 老师花名:冰冰 位置坐标:#龙华 上课花费:800/P 服务内容:课表 出击体验:真人比照片好看,太漂亮了,校花级别,光看脸就能硬。身材非常窈窕,冷白皮。老师很温柔,交了水费,和老师去洗澡,天然奶很挺,非常柔软让人爱不释手,口活很卖力,下面非常粉嫩没有异味,漂亮的馒头穴,忍不住翻身压着老师扛着大长腿狠狠插入,小穴非常紧致有吸附感,刚插入就爽到起鸡皮疙瘩,老师反馈真实,叫声非常诱人,一脸潮红的盯着我看,边舔着老师边抽插着小穴,在老师的紧紧拥抱下出水,出击到就是赚到。 优点缺点:小穴又粉又嫩又香,小穴的包裹感非常到位 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/binbsz

2🔥2👍1

7 Jun 2026, 05:17 UTC877 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lkzhyd

【验证报告】: https://t.me/lkzhyd 【验证留名】:溜溜 鼻屎 【上课时间】:6月6号 【老师花名】:冰冰 【位置坐标】:#龙华 【上课费用】:800/P 【服务内容】:课表 【出击体验】:进门就看见穿着黑丝纤细的腿,红底高跟鞋也是很有感觉!服务态度特别赞!来的时候本来是觉得照片跟本人肯定有些差距,没想到本人更好看!!!身材匀称,皮肤光滑细腻,逼紧户型干净漂亮粉红粉红的,口感和视觉拉满,说实话在龙华算得上极品了!全程真的配合度拉满,也不会催钟什么的,加上她那双灵动的双眼,直勾勾的看着你真的快拉丝了都,太魅惑了!!!整个体验感回味无穷,果然选择冰冰老师是对的,本人出击的次数也不少老师确实不错。 【优点缺点】:课室很干净有淡

2👍2🔥1🥰1

5 Jun 2026, 05:27 UTC705 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

今天合适做点快乐的事情🫴🏻等你来

2🥰2👍1

19 May 2026, 04:34 UTC732 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍21🥰1

10 May 2026, 10:42 UTC549 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ycfah

出击报告:https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名:华仔你好型 上课时间:5月10号 老师花名:冰冰 位置坐标:#龙华 上课花费:800/P 出击体验:今天休假,在群里看到冰冰老师很喜欢,赶紧问老师有空没,时间契合,状态ok,准备起飞,洗个澡准备出发,去到课室见到冰冰老师,交完水费,聊会天,老师就去放水了,洗澡很贴心,洗完还帮忙擦身,宾至如归的感觉。躺上床老师开始服务,开始吸奶,很不一样的感觉,老师吸奶还很专业,摸着老师软软的皮肤,抚摸秀发,吸奶着慢慢亲上脖子,老师的舌头很软,舔的很舒服,舔了一阵子开始口,我抚摸着老师的pp慢慢自然的转到69战斗模式,我舔她口,她口我舔,冰冰老师的口技又很舒服差点缴械,遂即穿上防弹衣,女上全自动摇啊摇,摇啊摇,摇到了精门关。出水后,老师也没急着抽出,还会继续摇啊摇,仿佛要一滴不剩榨出,整个人趴在我身我抱着她,脸贴着脸,还会偷偷亲脸,依偎着抚摸老师的身体和秀发,聊聊天。洗澡,回家。不得不说老

2👍2🔥1

5 May 2026, 05:28 UTC731 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

今天合适做点快乐的事情🫴🏻等你来 #龙华 #性感 #兼职 #风骚 #制服 联系 @binbif 双向联系 @bbitrbot

2👍2🥰1

5 May 2026, 05:22 UTC706 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ee66iopnn

出击报告:https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名:帕萨特 上课时间:1.24 老师花名:冰冰 位置坐标:#龙华 上课花费:800/P 出击体验:开始跟老师闲聊了许久,一下子就让我觉得特别亲切,就像女朋友在等我回家一样。一起脱完衣服,老师陪洗,事后正常流程躺床上,老师的舌头很灵活 ,很软,在龟头处来回舔动,舔咪咪,温柔至极,让我有全身触电的感觉,而后一口吞下,柔软的口腔包裹着我的阴茎,我全身瞬间感到一轻,仿佛置身云上,随着上下吸食,我已饥渴难耐,当即让老师帮我带上,老师从我身上坐下,顿时感到一股暖意在下方盘旋,老师开始不自觉的淫叫起来,女上了一会老师也累了,轮到我的回合了,传教士抱着老师的大腿开始发力,下面的暖流一直没停过,当我感觉差不多上头了,直接让老师翻过身来,后入进小穴里,老师的屁股顶上去阵阵波涛,真是难得,我也是紧紧抓住这硕大的屁股奋力冲击,老师也是被我干的双腿发软,但嘴上娇喘声依旧停不下来,直到我最后奋力

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @binbsz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 139,137 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“冰冰👑龙华🈶🏡🏠” (@binbsz), 2,308 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binbsz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.