Channel
@rgfhdz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
422subscribers
-783 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002570384429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rgfhdz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rgfhdz |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 23:22 | 422 | -28 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 450 | -280 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 730 | -243 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 973 | -90 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 1,063 | -72 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 1,135 | -70 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 1,205 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
56 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 48.2% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 35.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 8.93% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 5.36% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
出击报告：https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名：周伟 上课时间：8.27 老师花名：子珊 位置坐标：#龙岗 上课花费：800/P 出击体验：下午无聊找到老师，见面没想到竟然和照片几乎没差距，而且老师态度很好，进门递水聊天，热心的要进行陪浴，但我不好意思自己洗的，洗完老师换上我喜欢的包臀裙黑丝，然后开始服务，服务很认真不含糊，口活超一流，爽的一批，然后老师主动跟我69，老师小穴甜甜的，没异味，很享受，最后是深喉出货，老师服务态度好，女友感觉满满，可以继续返！ 优点缺点： 皮肤又白又嫩，口活真是一绝一深一浅的，口活很舒服。 推荐程度：推荐 联系方式：https://t.me/rgfhdz 温馨提醒：报告仅供参考，请理性选择，切勿对号入座
❤1
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：旺角卡 门 上课时间：8.14 老师花名：子珊 位置坐标：#龙岗 上课花费：800/P 出击体验：在群里挑选着哪个幸运儿能得到我的宠幸，最终选择了子珊妹妹，联系好时间确定了地点马上出发，依旧是遥控上楼，妹妹已在门口等待这我的到来，见面的那一刻就感觉来对了，妹妹曼妙的身姿，挺拔的小白兔，年轻的容貌特别的吸引我，主动挽着我的手臂进了房间，妹妹比较会聊天，没有丝毫冷场的气息，闲聊片刻交了水费，妹妹热情的帮我脱了衣服一起洗澡，洗完澡回到床边妹妹便蹲下帮我口了起来，口活简直了，差点给吸出来了，很少遇到口活这么好的老师了，接着到床上，紧紧的抱住我舔起了脖子咪咪，全身都舔了个遍，玩了一下69，下面粉粉的没有其他味道，水也是比较多的根本舔不完，又做了其它服务，在这个价位上服务的很有值得了，此刻已经是迫不及待的想进入妹妹身体了，套上套后就开始了，水多的缘故进入的很顺滑，进入的那一刻…
❤2👍1🤩1
宝宝😘子珊今天在岗哦🫦龙岗开课
❤1👍1
【验证报告】： https://t.me/lkzhyd 【验证留名】：蔡林枫 【上课时间】： 7.30 【老师花名】：子珊 【位置坐标】：#龙岗 【上课费用】：800/P 【服务内容】：课表 【出击体验】：逛了许久，看到老师的颜值立马想了，准时到达教室，进入教室老师笑脸相迎，寒暄几句老师去给我调试水温，简单清洗，我们开始进入主题，奶子不小，很挺拔 软软的很舒服，然后老师问我是她动还是我动，果断我动，然后先是正面，然后是后入，边插边揉老师的奶子，然后123出货，后面就是简单洗洗离开了教室，期待二刷老师 【优点缺点】：高颜值，眼睛很好看，胸大屁股翘，本人比照片还好看，逼紧💦多，床上反馈真实，服务意识强，态度很好。 【推荐程度】：推荐 …
❤1👍1🥰1
出击报告：https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名：温柔小屌（星仔） 上课时间：7.19 老师花名：子珊 位置坐标：#龙岗 上课花费：800/P 服务内容：课表 出击体验：导航到楼下，小区地方比较好找，交通方便，小区还是比较安全，遥控上楼，一进门看到颜值很高，有心动的感觉，本以为这么高的颜值又点高冷，没想到老师比较主动，口活很卖力，眼神杀手，舔蛋也很认真深喉可以完全吞下我的老二，一对大波非常紧致，我的手也没闲着，一只手完全握不住，难以忘记，服务节奏不急不赶，完全不是想让你快点出货走人，慢慢玩，慢慢爽，姿势也配合，非常有感觉，会叫老公特别骚，很完美的体验！值得出击 优点缺点：优点就是嫩，嫩的出水的那种 推荐程度：推荐 联系方式：https://t.me/rgfhdz
👍2
气氛到位了🫧🫦哥哥你什么时候到位呀🫶🏻
❤1👍1
#日常 #购物 亲爱的，这个文胸你觉得好看吗？ 我很喜欢我准备买下它👙
❤1👍1
出击报告：https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名：月下独酌 上课时间：7月1号 老师花名：子珊 位置坐标：#龙岗 上课花费：800/P 出击体验：看到榜上子珊老师，果断马上约课。到达后停车方便不用登记，课室环境好。老师绝对美女一枚，皮肤白皙，脸蛋诱人，人照符合9成吧，真人更有味道，坐下后抱着美女，她一点也不矫情，极为主动。我也是个爽快人，三下五除二脱去衣服去洗澡，没想到妹子还主动调戏我，洗完澡躺床上开始服务了，一摸老师水汪汪的，然后立马就扑上来直接往老二上招呼，这口活没齿感，速度把握的也不错，搞得我美滋滋的，技术是没的说，眼神看得我是欲望高涨啊。奶子晃得眼花缭乱，各种服务招呼了一遍，让给带上套把老师按在身下，对准桃花深处，狠狠的插入，妹子立马叫起来，心想这才哪到哪啊，缓缓的来了几下，一看下面出水多多，估计是动情了。加快速度，妹子的叫声真的很好听，叫的还比较大声，干的更爽，又换了几个姿势，干了二十来分钟交货，看着妹子满足的…
❤4👍1🔥1
出击报告：https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名：Eleven 上课时间：6.20 老师花名：子珊 位置坐标：#龙岗 上课花费：800/P 出击体验：约好时间，到了地方进门之后环境挺好的，收拾的很干净，人长得很好身材也不错，然后开始进入正题，主动要求跟我一起洗澡，感觉挺好的，洗完会帮我擦身体，然后到床上穿上了我喜欢的黑丝包臀裙，将老师的身材衬托的非常好，太性感了，小弟弟立马就有反应了，两个小灯泡手感很好，姿势要求不过分，都还可以，给我口的过程，看着我眼睛太迷人了，不得不说老师的口活非常好，顶不住了。老师开始带上小雨伞翻身坐了上来，疯狂摇动起来，屁股激烈的撞击着我，嘴里不断的说着淫荡的话，太舒服了，关键是下面能加能吸，换了几个动作，10分钟不到就交枪了，完事儿了也没有催着去洗澡，聊了一下天儿，洗澡结束，这次出击的旅程非常愉快，体验感非常好，值得表扬。 优点缺点： 嫩妹 真胸 屁股翘，三点粉 推荐程度：推荐 联系…
❤2👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1👍1
@lgzishangbot
在课室了，宝，外面热，来找我去去火❤️🔥❤️🔥
❤2👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rgfhdz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“龙岗🍓子珊💋朋友圈🏡” (@rgfhdz), 422 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rgfhdz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.