Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 宝安🧚‍♀️兔兔🉑夜🉑外

Channel

宝安🧚‍♀️兔兔🉑夜🉑外

@xianx3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

665subscribers

-78 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002113559761
TypeChannel
Username@xianx3
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xianx3

Growth

6657437047 August 2026 — 743 subscribers8 August 2026 — 743 subscribers8 August 2026 — 733 subscribers16 August 2026 — 665 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net -78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 653–755 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:34665-68
8 Aug 2026, 11:10733-10
8 Aug 2026, 02:02743no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:33743first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.0%
avg views ÷ 665 subscribers
Avg views / post
173
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (25 December 202530 July 2026)
Views total173
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2943.9%
👍1725.8%
🔥1218.2%
🥰710.6%
🌭11.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 03:50 UTC173 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lkzhyd

【验证报告】: https://t.me/lkzhyd 【验证留名】:小喇叭 10$變2500萬 【上课时间】:7.29 【老师花名】:兔兔 【位置坐标】:#宝安 【上课费用】:700/P 【服务内容】:课表 【出击体验】:我大概是下午五点左右去到老师的课室,然后一进门就看到一个穿着黑丝包臀裙的妹妹,身材很好看,皮肤比较白,身材比较瘦。然后妹妹很热情,我果断交完学费,然后就和妹妹在沙发上聊聊天,然后就去洗澡。妹妹会帮我洗得干干净净的,我的手也在不停地乱摸。然后我就领着妹妹去那房间里,我跟妹妹说我的耳朵和脖子比较敏感,她就会在那里慢慢轻轻地舔,挑逗我,让我很麻很酥。然后我让妹妹穿上黑丝和她69。妹妹的鲍鱼很肥而且没有异味,非常的舒服,舔得我

1👍1

18 Jul 2026, 04:03 UTC394 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ghfndd

🍑桃园🍑 https://t.me/ghfndd #兔兔 #深圳宝安 出击体验:老师指引到达课室,见面果然没叫我失望,样子好看,直击我的心巴上,🐻又大又软,一手握不住。交完水费,她陪我一起洗,脱下衣服,前凸后翘,一阵心里痒痒,水中箫很舒服。去到房间,享受老师的服务,柔滑的身子爱不释手,后面69,鲍鱼无异味,口活很强,小舌头灵活,后面戴套开战,进入老师的身体时,能感受到里面的蠕动,特别一提,后入时老师屁股一绝,视觉冲击强烈,姿势配合,几分钟就出货了,洗洗,抽根事后烟走了 联系方式:https://t.me/xianx3 双向:@tuygfdbot

1👍1

4 Jul 2026, 06:55 UTC675 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ycfah

出击报告:https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名:瑞钬 翟 上课时间:7-4 老师花名:#兔兔 位置坐标:#宝安 上课花费:1300PP 出击体验:性感漂亮温柔 听话 配合满分!无敌的超级好的体验!真如之前各位老哥的描述一样,一进门就是一张笑脸迎面而来的少女感,初恋感,可爱清纯又不失妩媚,能够满足你对少女的一切幻想,贴心的给我拿了一瓶水过来,然后和老师小小的聊了一会 。然后帮我洗澡脱衣服,那真是温柔的贤妻服务,皇帝般的享受,声音甜美,皮肤细腻,小兄弟一直挺立。上床后如恋人般,然后给我口,还没有口的时候,那个眼神,姿态,就让小兄弟差点爆炸,我说我来后入吧 老师很温柔懂事的配合,翘起了小屁股, 我慢慢的进入幽谷之后,里面的滚烫,拥挤,曲径通幽,灵魂和肉体得到升华,爽!做完之后也神清气爽,完美的性爱,完美的冬语! 休息了十几分钟 二pp开始 123…没忍住继续抽插,不多时便在妹子的呻吟声中缴枪投降,意犹未尽,看来前面兄

2👍1

24 Jun 2026, 05:07 UTC704 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @qingloucjbg

出击报告:https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名:Catherine 上课时间:6-23 老师花名:兔兔 位置坐标:#宝安 上课花费:700/P 服务内容:课表 出击体验:今天刚好有空,于是早早约好课,终于约到老师今天的头课了,到了定位遥控上楼,楼下无门禁,指引很清晰,开门见到老师很不错,非常漂亮的御姐,身材高挑,老师洗澡很仔细,前后都有照顾到,很细心,洗完有一次性浴巾,做好准备工作之后上床开始上课。上来老师先是舔咪咪,然后指滑,小老弟马上就一柱擎天了。老师口活也是十分顶,太刺激受不了了,随后就是AB面,服务做了十来分钟,我受不了了,就用我的大🐔🐔猛的插了进去,最可惜的是我时间不行啊,老师紧紧的抱住我的时候,自己交枪了很舒服地就出水了。老师还说我在坚持几分钟就好了,结束后聊聊天,老师还很贴心按摩,结束后也贴心帮忙洗澡,好评,下次必返。 优点缺点:漂亮嫩妹,态度是非常好 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https:/

1👍1🔥1

9 Jun 2026, 03:25 UTC744 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ee66iopnn

出击报告:https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名:龅牙强 上课时间:6-8 老师花名:兔兔 位置坐标:#宝安 上课花费:700/P 出击体验:早早约了妹妹的头课,已经关注妹妹很久了,终于还是没有忍住,进门看到妹妹坐在床上,人照9成,皮肤很白,果断交了水费就一起去洗浴了,洗好回到床上等待妹妹,我先下手让妹妹躺着,妹妹很敏感亲奶头还会发抖得娇喘,越这样我就越兴奋,口活一流无齿感,每一次进出都整根吞入,太爽了,69看着妹妹的小穴在我眼前晃动,用手指掰开小穴,露出了粉嫩的穴肉,年轻的肉体就是如此美妙,用拇指挑逗着阴蒂,妹妹一边娇喘一边口,不喊停就一直口,太舒服了。实在受不了了带上雨伞开干,不得不说真的好紧,一边插着一边舔,又紧又热得包裹感让我一下123了,很不错的出击体验,随后洗完澡聊了会天就撤了,会返。 优点缺点: 奶子很挺,小穴超多水而且非常紧,粉嫩 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/xianx3

3🌭1👍1🔥1

5 Jun 2026, 05:45 UTC650 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

闲下来啦,时间全留给你,你来就好🌷

🥰21

22 May 2026, 04:30 UTC738 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lkzhyd

【验证报告】: https://t.me/lkzhyd 【验证留名】:肥佬坤 【上课时间】:5.21 【老师花名】:兔兔 【位置坐标】:#宝安 【上课费用】:1300PP 【服务内容】:课表 【出击体验】:妹子人照9.5分,真人比照片看着更自然更亲切一点,皮肤紧致,摸起来手感很好,很滑,胸对我来说不大不小刚刚好,奶头很小,粉粉嫩嫩的,让人爱不释手,屁股又大又翘翘,天生的炮架子,后入的时候特别爽,小穴真的很紧。很快首发就交货,实在太紧了,妹子小穴又会吸,很容易123,完事儿一起冲了澡。不得不说,妹子很贴心,怕我结束太快膈应,让我多坐一下,还跟我八卦了一些上学时的美好时光,抱着妹子聊聊天,整个人感觉特别放松,情趣价值很高,很有女友感,会反食的

2👍1

15 May 2026, 04:18 UTC667 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ycfah

出击报告:https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名:蟑螂恶霸 上课时间:5月14号 老师花名:兔兔 位置坐标:#宝安 上课花费:700/P 出击体验:地方方便好找,提前到了楼下按指示进房,看到妹子还真不懒,我个人挺喜欢这款的,身材ok,在沙发上小坐一会后洗澡躺床上,不得不说兔兔的口活真的棒,从蛋蛋舔到根部,非常爽,口了大概5分钟赶紧叫停戴套女上,兔兔女上完全就是全自动,要不是中途赶紧切换了姿势感觉就要被女上榨出来了,切换了姿势后在兔兔的浪叫中美美出水。口活和女上非常爽,想体验的一定不要错过~ 优点缺点: 嫩妹一枚 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/xianx3 温馨提醒:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座

3👍1🔥1

9 May 2026, 05:22 UTC627 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

我是动感超人,动感光波,啵啵啵啵🫦

1👍1🔥1

30 Apr 2026, 03:32 UTC695 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @qingloucjbg

出击报告:https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名:孙猴子 上课时间:4月29号 老师花名:兔兔 位置坐标:#宝安 上课花费:700/P 服务内容:课表 出击体验:朋友推荐的,他体验过,说不错,今天约的老师,发好地址就去了,停车场离课室挺近,不难找,也没有门禁,见老师没让我失望,温柔,漂亮,性感,御姐型是我喜欢的,四处看了一下环境还可以,东西准备的也挺齐的,干净,还给我准备的矿泉水,简单聊了几句,交钱洗澡,全程不用我动手,洗的很仔细,洗完回到床上,流程叫什么名字我也不知道,总体来说,前戏做得很足,非常非常舒服,老师挺白的,皮肤也滑,口活好,下边紧,她来高潮次数比我多,热情,可返。 优点缺点:情绪给满,口很舒服没有齿感差点把我秒了 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/xianx3

1👍1🥰1

13 Apr 2026, 04:38 UTC700 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ghfndd

🍑桃园🍑 https://t.me/ghfndd #兔兔 #深圳宝安 出击体验:妹妹一眼看去就是很顺眼,淡妆打扮,身材很顶,温柔淑静,没想到收获一个小惊喜, 一起洗澡,真胸大小合适,态度很好,全程很配合,水多逼紧 包裹感很强,特别是后入特紧,这个屁股我是超级喜欢,非常好的一次出击体验,工作室很安全,妹妹服务没得说,口活很舒服,舌头灵活,会主动撩人,笑起来超甜,又有点娇羞,性感的外表搭配羞涩的表情,像和女友一般爱爱。特别有保护欲,让人欲罢不能,推荐!女友感十足,很紧,不机车,不催,很配合,很完美的一次出击体验。 联系方式:@ttuum6 双向:@tuygfdbot

1👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xianx3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 507,354 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“宝安🧚‍♀️兔兔🉑夜🉑外” (@xianx3), 665 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xianx3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.