Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 龙岗❤️美美🥰

Channel

龙岗❤️美美🥰

@dfdsfsdsx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

396subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002819850312
TypeChannel
Username@dfdsfsdsx
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dfdsfsdsx

Growth

3964224097 August 2026 — 422 subscribers8 August 2026 — 417 subscribers8 August 2026 — 417 subscribers14 August 2026 — 396 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 392–426 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:06396-21
8 Aug 2026, 05:33417no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:47417-5
7 Aug 2026, 18:17422first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.5%
avg views ÷ 396 subscribers
Avg views / post
149
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,527
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC58 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @qingloucjbg

出击报告:https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名:Hui WIN 上课时间:8/5 老师花名:#美美 位置坐标:#龙岗 上课花费:1300 服务内容:全套 出击体验:课室很好找,到电梯口直接遥控上门,开门进来后,第一眼的感觉就是老师穿的非常性感,皮肤白嫩细腻,上面那对粉嫩的玉兔便是若隐若现,短裙下洁白修长的大腿也是非常诱人,瞬间就感觉来对了。先洗澡,妹妹也进来一起帮弟弟洗澡,看着我那急不可耐的弟弟,妹妹二话不说,直接蹲下来一口含住,妹妹看起来很有技巧,我从未有过如此美妙的体验,直到我实在受不了,才主动要求到床上。 上床之后,妹妹让我躺着,然后继续服务,时而漫游、时而舔蛋蛋,69时口含住弟弟,我舔着老师的BB,无异味,水多.多汁。老师口技也是一流,打转,震动,全程整根包裹,卷得鸡吧酥麻透顶。不到一会儿的功夫顺利出货!这次体验让我流连忘返,下次再战! 优点缺点:人照匹配 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://

3 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC99 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ee66iopnn

出击报告:https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名:黄艺 上课时间:8/3 老师花名:美美 位置坐标:#龙岗 上课花费:1300 出击体验:今天来约美美老师,进入房间老师换上拖鞋,随后洗澡,洗完老师帮忙擦干,然后服务,口的十分卖力,没有齿感,是真的爽,还用力顶了两次深喉。忍受不了老师的口活,带上雨伞开工,女上位进入直插,感觉老师有点受不了,但哪能饶了老师,一顿疯狂输出变化各个姿势,伴随阵阵呻吟交货一课,休息片刻和老师洗了澡,接着躺在床上休息,顺势拥入怀中,一波调情后,翻身将老师压在身下,舔舔老师的奶头,很快老师就奶头坚硬,随即让老师趁热打铁口了口,第二课体力有限,变换了两个姿势准备冲刺交货,谁知老师突然高潮抽动还一把推开了我,那画面不要太美妙了,也是第一次把老师干高潮了,而且是完全真实的感觉,随即一顿输出交货,趁着小弟还硬又抽插了几次,深深顶入老师身体,很不错的体验。 优点缺点:身材不错,够骚,口活非常不错 推荐程

28 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC199 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @qingloucjbg

出击报告:https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名:西游 上课时间:7-27 老师花名:#美美 位置坐标:#龙岗 上课花费:700 服务内容:课表 出击体验:一进门,美美小短裙➕黑丝,身材凹凸有致,曲线完美,交水费后,开始共浴,老师帮我涂满沐浴露,我手扶老师的大胸,很柔软,手感很好,抱了一个会,老师蹲下去含住小弟弟口了起来,很是舒服,洗完去卧室,小弟弟已经硬的不行,等她调情,等她口,早已经饥渴难耐了,抓住她的头发一顿猛猛后入,爽飞,老师一边喊着哥哥干我,一边呻吟着,叫声很酥,很好听,越叫我越来劲,正面翻过来,更加猛烈的撞击,揉胸的力度更大,老师叫的更欢,翻云覆雨后,我抱着老师休息了一会儿,就洗完澡心满意足的回家了 优点缺点:态度好,皮肤好,胸型不错,粉嫩 推荐程度:强烈推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/dfdsfsdsx

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dfdsfsdsx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 81,779 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“龙岗❤️美美🥰” (@dfdsfsdsx), 396 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dfdsfsdsx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.