Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 光明💦阳阳(个人兼职)

Channel

光明💦阳阳(个人兼职)

@bhvgng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

320subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003025015410
TypeChannel
Username@bhvgng
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bhvgng

Growth

320341330.57 August 2026 — 341 subscribers7 August 2026 — 340 subscribers8 August 2026 — 340 subscribers14 August 2026 — 320 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 317–344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 02:07320-20
8 Aug 2026, 07:02340no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:58340-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:32341first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.0%
avg views ÷ 320 subscribers
Avg views / post
170
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,375
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC69 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ee66iopnn

出击报告:https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名:董箐 上课时间:8.4 老师花名:阳阳 位置坐标:#光明 上课花费:700 出击体验:看了老师的频道,今天有空果断出击联系,约好了时间到了发的位置后,一开门人比照片好看,老师很温柔,身材前凸后翘,很符合我的胃口,交了水费就去洗澡了,水中消特别舒服,洗完澡开始服务,皮肤很光滑,大长腿,口活很厉害,深喉特别牛逼,每一个服务都十分舒服,幻想体验的感觉在这里体验到,太爽了!对太多的细节就不细说了,只能自己亲身体验才行,可以放心冲, 优点缺点: 前凸后翘 推荐程度:推广 联系方式:https://t.me/bhvgng 温馨提醒:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座

3 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC112 viewsread 8 August 2026

出击报告:https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名:yon 上课时间:8/3 老师花名:#阳阳 位置坐标:#光明 上课花费:13002️⃣ 出击体验:今天来约阳阳老师,进入房间老师换上拖鞋,随后洗澡,洗完老师帮忙擦干,然后服务,口的十分卖力,没有齿感,是真的爽,还用力顶了两次深喉。忍受不了老师的口活,带上雨伞开工,女上位进入直插,感觉老师有点受不了,但哪能饶了老师,一顿疯狂输出变化各个姿势,伴随阵阵呻吟交货一课,休息片刻和老师洗了澡,接着躺在床上休息,顺势拥入怀中,一波调情后,翻身将老师压在身下,舔舔老师的奶头,很快老师就奶头坚硬,随即让老师趁热打铁口了口,第二课体力有限,变换了两个姿势准备冲刺交货,谁知老师突然高潮抽动还一把推开了我,那画面不要太美妙了,也是第一次把老师干高潮了,而且是完全真实的感觉,随即一顿输出交货,趁着小弟还硬又抽插了几次,深深顶入老师身体,很不错的体验。 优点缺点:身材不错,够骚,口活非常不错 推荐

25 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC257 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lkzhyd

【验证报告】: https://t.me/lkzhyd 【验证留名】:公子哥 【上课时间】: 7-24 【老师花名】:#阳阳 【位置坐标】:#光明 【上课费用】:700 【服务内容】:课表 【出击体验】:听指挥上楼有留门,一进门就看到ls了,可可爱爱的小姑娘,聊了一会进入正题,身材服务都蛮好的,123秒了之后又坐着聊了会,然后ls外卖到了我就溜,体验很好下次还来。 【优点缺点】:服务好 【推荐程度】:值得推广 【联系方式】:https://t.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bhvgng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 146,954 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“光明💦阳阳(个人兼职)” (@bhvgng), 320 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bhvgng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.