Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 光明💓兔子(新人兼职)

Channel

光明💓兔子(新人兼职)

@tztzmg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,014subscribers

-442 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002242110234
TypeChannel
Username@tztzmg
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tztzmg

Growth

2,0142,4562,2357 August 2026 — 2,456 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,439 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,297 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,147 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,014 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -442. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,948–2,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:242,014-133
14 Aug 2026, 02:182,147-150
10 Aug 2026, 16:212,297-142
8 Aug 2026, 01:542,439-17
7 Aug 2026, 18:182,456first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 9 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 2,014 subscribers
Avg views / post
209
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (9 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total418
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2941.4%
👍1927.1%
🥰912.9%
🔥710.0%
🍌22.86%
😍22.86%
🍓11.43%
💯11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @qingloucjbg

出击报告:https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名:thomas 上课时间:8.6 老师花名:兔子 位置坐标:#光明 上课花费:700/P 服务内容:课表 出击体验:进门发现老师身材长相都很不错,脱衣帮洗澡,很细心的洗,调情很有感觉,提枪上马,老师胸很大,女上位视角下大白兔上上下下好顶,换后入更紧,不一会就顶不住了,换回传教士出水,后面再多的细节舍不得说,感觉是自己发现的宝藏,下次还会返 优点缺点:身材很好,性格很喜欢 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/tztzmg

1

24 Jul 2026, 03:12 UTC373 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ycfah

出击报告:https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名:Joker 上课时间:7-23 老师花名:兔子 位置坐标:#光明 上课花费:1300PP 出击体验:进门之后看到老师属于娇小型,穿了包臀裙黑丝,然后交谈了一会,就去洗澡洗完之后老师给我口,老师真的很会口,口起来特别有感觉口的时间也比较长,口完之后带套开始做老师的穴真的很紧 插了好一会才整根插进去,老师就开始主动说骚话,还交了我一个姿势夹的巨紧,我猛猛操老师直接高潮了,全身都在抖,水也流了很多,换了两三个姿势我就败下阵来,但是老师不让我拔出去我又插了好一会才满足。休息了一会躺在一块聊天,然后继续第二发 老师用大柰子给我推背面 老师柰子真的很大,而且乳晕和乳头都是我喜欢的类型很有美感,我第二次时间比较长第一个姿势的时候插了几分钟拔出来的时候那个水飞我脸上了,水真的很多,然后又换成了后入插了很久,老师说自己高潮了三次 每次全身都在发抖,大奶子也跟着颤太骚了,然后换了好几个姿势给

2👍2🍌1

10 Jul 2026, 03:34 UTC633 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ee66iopnn

出击报告:https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名:Michale 上课时间:7月9号 老师花名:兔子 位置坐标:#光明 上课花费:700/P 出击体验:清纯可爱漂亮,一眼就心动喜欢。进到房间就抱着坐在我腿上,用她的下面开始挑逗我了,脱下她的内内,亲吻她的粉嫩鲍鱼,香气扑鼻。被她舔的也是快射了。带上套,喜欢她的女上,骚弄着我的大棒子。换后入,深深浅浅,叫的很大声,太骚了。持续了半小时,最后完美射出来了!真的刺激又爽会玩,漂亮,皮肤很白很滑,我都夸了她好几遍。她可能也被夸多了回应着要一直被我操。男人的宝藏女孩子。休息片刻,下次还要继续。好不容易遇到喜欢的,一定要操个够。 优点缺点: 各方面都很不错 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/tztzmg 温馨提醒:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座

1🍓1👍1🔥1

1 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC882 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💞说想我的,可以过来找我了

👍32🥰2

24 Jun 2026, 04:38 UTC≈1,010 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lkzhyd

【验证报告】: https://t.me/lkzhyd 【验证留名】:EDC的朋友(书院君陌) 【上课时间】:6月23号 【老师花名】:兔子 【位置坐标】:#光明 【上课费用】:1300PP 【服务内容】:课表 【出击体验】:食过返寻味,今天再次约了兔子老师的尾课,幸运约成。到了约定的时间,我立马驱车前往。到达指定战场,交完水费之后和她一起褪去衣物,然后到了浴室,一起洗白白,洗完回到床上老师开始服务,老师口的时候差点没有忍住就🚀了,感觉差不多了就开始带上tt,让老师先女上起手,老师一边女上摇摇车,我慢慢的往下移动吻到老师的胸,好圆好挺好Q弹,真是又圆又白,不知道是不是今天老师穿包臀裙和黑丝的原因,很快就有感觉了,换成后入骑乘,抓着老师光滑

2👍1💯1🥰1

9 Jun 2026, 07:42 UTC≈1,110 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

天气舒服到不想赶路,只想吹吹风~

3👍2🥰2🍌1

5 Jun 2026, 07:35 UTC≈1,130 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

1🥰1

28 May 2026, 05:29 UTC≈1,280 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @qingloucjbg

出击报告:https://t.me/qingloucjbg 验证留名:骚逼观察员 上课时间:5-27 老师花名:兔子 位置坐标:#光明 上课花费:700/P 服务内容:课表 出击体验:位置很好找,遥控上楼,笑脸相迎。交了水费,有陪洗,态度很好。身材很好,口活也可以,舔咪咪很舒服。戴套换了几个姿势,床上叫的很骚,传教士没几分钟就会出水了,好润,舌头软软的,还不错,最后在浪叫声中出水。 优点缺点:水多很润 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/tztzmg

2👍1🔥1

19 May 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,330 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

心里装着美好💞眼里的世界就美好💕🌷

🥰21👍1

12 May 2026, 05:25 UTC≈1,430 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ycfah

出击报告:https://t.me/ycfah 验证留名:深圳 海德堡 上课时间:5月11号 老师花名:兔子 位置坐标:#光明 上课花费:1300PP 出击体验:今天有空出击兔子妹妹,一见面 妹妹很漂亮,颜值很高,妹妹身材也很好,给人感觉很舒服 笑容很温暖,态度没得话说,全程都是笑眯眯的,真实自然,服务都是课表内容,口活非常舒服,重要的是 不说假话 下面是真的很紧,第一次遇到过这么紧的老师,爽感太强了。而且水还很多,这么紧的小穴真是天生吃这碗饭的。今天体验感极好,两次下来非常舒服了呀,有空还会出击兔子妹妹的,兔子妹妹下面很紧,服务态度好,我肯定会再去的。 优点缺点: 人照9成以上,嫩妹小小只,本人颜值比照片好看,肤白滑嫩三点粉,身材苗条无赘肉,比较健谈,乖巧听话态度好,床上反馈真实。 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:https://t.me/tztzmg 温馨提醒:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座

4👍2🔥2

9 May 2026, 05:04 UTC≈1,170 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

❣️今日任务:和异性做奇妙的事(0/3)吃饱饭(2/3)🉑约

2👍1🔥1😍1

29 Apr 2026, 04:26 UTC≈1,420 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ee66iopnn

出击报告:https://t.me/ee66iopnn 验证留名:陈情 上课时间:4月28号 老师花名:兔子 位置坐标:#光明 上课花费:700/P 出击体验:收藏了兔子老师有一段时间了,看过之前报告对兔子老师的颜值已经有了很明确的期待,看到了很多狼友反馈都是很不错的,眼见为实体验为准,约好时间地点果断赴约,老师和频道差别很小,真实有8成很不错的了,眼睛比照片小一些人照8成。付过水费接着就是放热水洗澡,老师洗的很认真,动作也很轻柔,洗完了来到床上开始服务。老师属于口的时间相当长的,没有齿感非常舒服,也不会太刺激让人一下子就缴械,还会耐心的问你是否需要延长时间,我选择接着戴t,从正面再到后面,再回到前面,体验感不错,小穴很多水很润滑,需要注意时间久了老师会有痛感可能是刚下海的缘故吧,总体来说很配合,结束后也耐心洗澡冲水,总体过程非常舒服,让人有放松感。 优点缺点: 嫩妹,皮肤白嫩滑,小穴粉嫩,爱爱很配合 推荐程度:推荐 联系方式:

👍21🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tztzmg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 212,558 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“光明💓兔子(新人兼职)” (@tztzmg), 2,014 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tztzmg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.