Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Drones4Front

Channel

Drones4Front

@Drones4Front

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

398subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541220321
TypeChannel
Username@Drones4Front
Created12 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Drones4Front

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

396399397.57 August 2026 — 396 subscribers8 August 2026 — 396 subscribers14 August 2026 — 397 subscribers22 August 2026 — 399 subscribers8 September 2026 — 397 subscribers15 September 2026 — 398 subscribers3987 August 202615 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 396–399 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 11:37398+1
8 Sept 2026, 01:57397-2
22 Aug 2026, 22:56399+2
14 Aug 2026, 23:15397+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:50396no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:53396first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36m 05s
Average length
9m 01s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱325.0%
❤216.7%
✍18.33%
👀18.33%
👍18.33%
👏18.33%
👻18.33%
🔥18.33%
🙏18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC50 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @darpaandciaPhoto

Пентагон ставит на конвейер «одноразовую авиацию» В сентябре 2022 года Офис заместителя министра обороны США выдал компании Orbital Research Inc.* контракт на 9 с лишним миллионов долларов в рамках спецпрограммы APFIT. Пентагон сформулировал для них заказ на 1700 пластиковых «планирующих бомб» и 24 боевых дрона с системами сброса. И вот на днях был опубликован патент, в котором раскрыта вся инженерная начинка этого …

10 Jun 2026, 02:00 UTC170 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @filatovcorr

Акселератор военных технологий Андрея Филатова «Осколково» принимает заявки от здравых парней и девчат. Друзья! Последние несколько лет я снимал и писал не для того, чтобы получить премию. Я считал трупы, фиксировал потери техники и делал все от меня зависящее, чтобы этого было как можно меньше. Половина потерь в зоне боевых действий — это не тупость командира. Это системная проблема, которая родилась за тысячи ки…

1 Jun 2026, 09:59 UTC152 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @my_el_labPhoto

Здравствуйте Китай с февраля запустил новую стратегию. Китай хочет быть не только фабрикой мира, но и Лабораторией мира. Запущены программы по привелечению RND компаний на территории Китая. По-русски: разработчики, добро пожаловать, создадим условия. А у нас люди переживают, что Разработчики разбегутся, но не переживают, что разбегутся целые компании. Странные. А что, у нас? Этот вопрос прилетает нам последнии дни…

😱3👍1🔥1

30 May 2026, 16:30 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kcpn2014Video

Небо глазами врага. Три года войны оператора в полку «Скала» 🔔Аналитический центр КЦПН перевёл интервью с вражеским оператором БПЛА, который подробно рассказал о том, как у них устроена работа пилотов, как организовано обучение и своей собственной мотивации, отличии теории от практики. В общем, очередной штрих к портрету нашего противника: 📍Как устроен современный дрон-батальон. Разведка и ударка в полку «Скала» ра…

✍1👀1👻1

29 May 2026, 03:36 UTC129 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @voron_fpv

Здарова! Сегодня я просто хочу тем, кто, может, не в теме или просто уже потерял какую-либо надежду на будущее, сказать пару ласковых фактов, о которых Вам стоит подумать! Начнём мы с того, с чего, собственно, всё начиналось вообще. Тема FPV-дронов достаточно молодая — 3 года с небольшим (первые применения были и в Донецке, и даже в Сирии в качестве переноски полезной нагрузки — но это мелочи). Начинается СВО — наш…

1 May 2026, 15:31 UTC209 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @oper_goblinVideo

С Первомаем🎇, трудящиеся🤝

👏1

28 Apr 2026, 03:14 UTC199 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @payloadUAVPhoto

Привет, дорогие читатели! Полезная Нагрузка на связи👋 🛰 Сегодня поговорим про два способа охоты на Starlink - физический РТР и перехват по отпечатку Wi-Fi. На примере двух засвеченных решений: китайский портативный Ku-приёмник Hobit XL1 и иранская программа-детектор по радиоотпечатку абонентского роутера из утёкшей 3-страничной методички для оперсостава. фото 1-7 Hobit XL1 от AeroSeek - перехват Ku-аплинка Портатив…

26 Apr 2026, 06:06 UTC127 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @UAVDEVPhoto

Знаете что это? Это боевая часть дрона-перехватчика. В то время как хохлячьи дроны попадают в дом в Екатеринбурге, царапают осколками бдк в Крыму и убивают, попутно, десяток мирных, разработчики дронов-перехватчиков пытаются хоть как-то обойти запреты бешеного принтера, изобретая пво из говна и палок. Одним из решений является установка на борт ПЕТАРДЫ БДЬ! Потому что ничего другого поставить на борт нельзя. Даже…

25 Apr 2026, 02:32 UTC131 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dva_majorsVideo

Плохо. Охота на русские МОГи 🐽Каналы противника: "Украинские дроны Hornet с ИИ-системой автозахвата начали системную охоту на мобильные огневые группы России. На Донецком направлении зафиксировано их применение для подавления ПВО малого радиуса. Как признают профильные ресурсы РФ, связка «машинное зрение + Starlink» становится критическим фактором, позволяющим украинским силам эффективно проводить комбинированные во…

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Drones4Front. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Музыка для мотивации⚡️🎧 тренировок спорта 🔥
@best_motivation_music · 22,291
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Drones4Front” (@Drones4Front), 398 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Drones4Front.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.