Channel
@rednote_ob
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,872subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002370596569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rednote_ob |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rednote_ob |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 2,872 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 2,865 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 2,865 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (22 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,420 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
本人男，95 年，二线城市程序员，双休，年收入约 20 万。有房有车但有房贷，月供基本由公积金覆盖。目前商贷还剩 10 多万，公积金贷款还剩 40 多万。 买房买车时父母已经支持了不少，当然以后父母养老我也会承担相应责任。我有两个姐姐，所以不太想结婚时再向父母拿太多钱。这两年我的存款也基本用于提前偿还房贷。 女方比我小 4 岁，在相距 300 多公里的另一座城市做护士，轮班，休息时间不固定。她家三个孩子，家庭比较重男轻女。她专升本时部分费用依靠贷款，父母只愿意承担一部分；工作以后，父亲还会向她要钱。 她目前工作稳定，也已经适应当地生活，有两个关系很好的合租同事，生活比较独立。如果为了结婚来我所在的城市，确实可能失去现在的工作、收入和熟悉的社交环境，重新找到的工作待遇大概率也不如现在。 我们今年 4 月初相亲认识，5 月 1 日确定关系，平均每个月见两次。平时聊天、旅行和线下相处都很好，双方也都愿意为对方付出。 最近我们聊到了彩礼…
👍1
已婚人士给点建议吧，我真的很纠结。 小編覺得。。第一個可以多處處，等荷爾蒙過去再說
真的不要再问老外A不AA这种蠢问题了 這年頭居然還有講師了？😇
#互推 【书籍分享】电子书资源分享 📚 【二次元美图】公诸同好 | 二次元美图分享 🅥 【软件分享】TK集库 【小红书分享】小红薯抽象观察 【音声&涩涩】永不消逝的音声 【科技分享】折腾啥 【安卓黄游】安卓黄油の领域（转世重生ver）❤️ 【小说分享】日更100 刺猬猫菠萝包起点飞卢小说有声书txt分享 【心声树洞】赛博忏悔室 Powered by @Summer_Clear_Sky_Bot
❤1
作者：河北夫妇（家有五宝） 不生儿子不罢休，人生赢家 牛逼，以后享福享不完咯😆😆😆😆
傻狗找了根粉色的给我 这段时间天气热，傻狗比较激动，老是会追脚蹭来蹭去[笑哭了R]，最多放一次鸡精，今天直接三次，然后送了我一根粉色的，看来粉色是它喜欢的颜色。如何在不找老婆（因为它攻击一切…）的情况下让傻狗冷静点 这是塞哪里的😅
Photo, posted without a caption
30岁小阿姨怀孕纯自学俩月重新参加高考 省流：考的中医 再次省流：考了356分 果然高考还是公平的，让你进了医院，户子不得原地复播😆😆😆
❤1
韩国实施免费卫生巾政策，中国会实施吗 😅现在闹钟的素质，刚实施就被你们xxn薅完了
❤1
古代三妻四妾不怕得艾滋病吗？ 因为古代没人强奸大猩猩😇
Photo, posted without a caption
主人 带尾巴的好开心～ 不是，这么长？？能塞进去？😇
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @rednote_ob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 420,450 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小红薯抽象观察” (@rednote_ob), 2,872 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rednote_ob.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.