Only from those boys who can understand Hindi.
custom 603299116025381163113🔥10🗿7custom 53440588466943510777💯3❤2🏆1

Channel
@THEoutsmarterPJ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,334subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002174602283 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @THEoutsmarterPJ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/THEoutsmarterPJ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 1,334 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 1,335 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 1,335 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
287 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6032991160253811631 | 89 | 31.0% | |
| ❤ | 65 | 22.6% | |
| custom 5344058846694351077 | 39 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 10.8% | |
| 🗿 | 27 | 9.41% | |
| 🏆 | 20 | 6.97% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 5.57% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 287reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2024 to 20 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Only from those boys who can understand Hindi.
custom 603299116025381163113🔥10🗿7custom 53440588466943510777💯3❤2🏆1
Shoutout to my nig friend from OTF. Cause of him i am finally out of the trenches 😂 Fr he good guy. https://t.me/xtremetrenches
🔥5🏆1🗿1custom 60329911602538116311
I got haters. I will use them for my waiter - " yes PJ saaar u bad boi misognist "
custom 603299116025381163113❤2🏆2🔥1
Got a update from a insider trade. Bitcoin gonna get a wick of 86k. And than gonna pump back. So that its can get some liq. If you are looking for entry get your limit orders ready.
❤6💯2🔥2
Tiktok meta is crazy. Ape some shit on pumpfun and cashout free money. Everything is just pumping and giving free money.
🔥7🏆1
$IM - Internet Money Amvt8DHYHpPaw1ZkBBWorExvWBN3D9A2FmH1Qkkfpump Adding this to my long term bag. I think it's little undervalued. Could take time. But let's see atleast. - It's not for a Short term. Like getting small profit and exit. Shit will take time. So avoid entering if your portfolio is small.
❤2🗿2🏆1🔥1
Did you forget this shit 🤣. ( Sorry my english audiance Its got diff language. )
custom 603299116025381163115custom 53440588466943510774🗿3🏆2
If any influencer say GM Its means ghand marao ( GM ) merko kya mai kama rha hu
custom 603299116025381163112💯3custom 53440588466943510771
4 Step BluePrint to make money. 1. Start a channel 2. Bundle the shit 3. Call the shit 4. Eating flwers money. 🤭 Confidential. Make sure this post should not shared to wings. 🤣
❤12custom 60329911602538116316🏆1🔥1custom 53440588466943510771
Time to sleep. Closing my day 4 :- 18 to 37 SOL Just completed my Challange. What's should be next challange ? Reboot it again to 2 ? Or 37 to 100 ? Previous Day Info + Extra Info : https://t.me/THEoutsmarterPJ/1025
💯4custom 53440588466943510773🔥2❤1🏆1🗿1
Maths meta is very confusing. Am not gonna ape single shit. Going for sleep.
custom 603299116025381163110❤3
Posted without readable text
❤32custom 534405884669435107715🏆4💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @THEoutsmarterPJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@THEoutsmarterPJ named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PJ (Confidential) |” (@THEoutsmarterPJ), 1,334 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/THEoutsmarterPJ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.