Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net -543. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,659–17,037 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 14:16
15,862
-8
8 Nov 2026, 03:57
15,870
-9
6 Nov 2026, 21:48
15,879
-7
5 Nov 2026, 22:17
15,886
-5
2 Nov 2026, 22:01
15,891
-11
1 Nov 2026, 22:27
15,902
+5
1 Nov 2026, 01:49
15,897
+3
31 Oct 2026, 04:08
15,894
+152
30 Oct 2026, 01:07
15,742
+92
29 Oct 2026, 01:28
15,650
+195
28 Oct 2026, 01:17
15,455
+148
27 Oct 2026, 01:49
15,307
+139
25 Oct 2026, 23:04
15,168
+167
25 Oct 2026, 01:06
15,001
+174
23 Oct 2026, 21:46
14,827
+203
22 Oct 2026, 23:01
14,624
+234
21 Oct 2026, 22:17
14,390
+447
20 Oct 2026, 20:10
13,943
+582
19 Oct 2026, 17:18
13,361
+197
18 Oct 2026, 15:46
13,164
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 15,862 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,780
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
67 (19 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
26,750
Reactions total
344
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 06:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,940
Videos
≈33
Links
≈2,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,332 reactions across 67 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
540
40.5%
👍
424
31.8%
🤔
187
14.0%
🐳
154
11.6%
😁
21
1.58%
👎
4
0.3%
🤯
2
0.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,332 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 67 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Crypto_Prime11. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
😠 Выносим стейблы от Voice за инвайт друзей
Voice - это свежий рынок мнений на чейне Solana, который выступает аналогом предикт маркетов, но имеет большое отличие в том, что тут нет проигравшей стороны, а значит, награды получают все.
Уже долгое время проект награждает комьюнити наградами в стейблах, разных поинтах и т.д. Совсем недавно же запустили вторую эпоху Road to TGE, в которой сейчас можно поучаствовать в р…
😠 Фиксим стейблы и отправляем их работать заново
Начнем сперва с предыдущего разлока INFINIT, которого колил 6 ноября. Буквально спустя сутки проект логично запампил свой токен на пару свечей для сбрива шортеров, благодаря чему можно было открыть позицию в шорт около $0.027 или же вовсе $0.028, если ты везунчик.
Если бы позу закрыли еще вчера, можно было бы залутать более 120% профита. А если зашли с лучшей твх и з…
😠 Шортим $IN и чекаем старые разлоки
Сперва хочу начать с будущего разлока, который будет довольно мелким, но потенциально перспективным, т.к тима разлоков еще не делала, а кушать им та нужно, а значит могут все слить в стакан.
Речь сегодня пойдет за проект INFINIT, токен которого котируется на всех топ биржах с $9,3млн капы и $27млн FDV. Видим тут существенный навес будущего предложения, а это создает давку, котор…
😠 Поймать хорошее шорт движение сможем?
Долго мять резину не буду, т.к каждый уже понимает принцип работы шорт разлоков и способы наших мувов. Так вот, уже завтра будет разлок токенов у Power Protocol, который сольет на рынок всего $1.4млн, а это 9% от капы. Кажется, будто разлок слишком мелкий, но главный фокус разлока идет на инвесторов Bitkraft Ventures и т.д., а они точно могут слить все в стакан.
👌 Исторически…
😠 Hyperliquid становится любимчиком Вашингтона?
Пока весь рынок шатает от вечных инфоповодов, взлома Binance и т.д., $HYPE решил пойти против потока навоза. Совсем недавно вышла инфа про партнерство с ICE, владельцем NYSE, из-за чего токен улетел на 15-020% и залетел в топ-10 по капе.
В целом Hyperliquid всегда как-то особенно интересовал инвесторов и комьюнити за счет реального ютилити, хорошей экосистемы и большо…
😠 Вкусновато, но маловато
Вот и подошел октябрь к концу, поэтому продолжим нашу новую месячную отчетную рубрику, где я подвожу итоги всех дефолтных трейдинг, разлок и DCA колов. В этом месяце сделок было не так много, но профиты перекрывают это несчастье.
➖$PUMP (12 окт) - Очередной колл на набор токена под спот + лонг. Спустя несколько дней после кола токен забустился с $0.0056 до $0.0064, а это дало бы 15+% для …
😠 Время лутать профит с разлока
Все прошлые колы были уверенно отработаны, значит, можно пихать свои копеечки во что-то новенькое, на чем также надеюсь заработать. Как всегда, не рискуем: торгуем с 10x плечом и 5-10% от балика в сделку.
Сегодня речь пойдёт о проекте Collector Crypt с их токеном $CARDS, который торгуется почти на всех биржах с капой в $126млн, FDV в $600млн и ценой токена $0,3. Уже завтра будет разл…
😠 Майним без вложений и претендуем на Airdrop
Sirius Network - это свежий проект, который позиционирует себя как глобальную сеть, где участие и вклад идут раньше владения.
Прямо сейчас в их апке можно участвовать в 24 часовых циклах для заработка SST поинтов. В будущем все нафармленные поинты напрямую повлияют на раздачу токенов $SRT. Согласно их токеномике, на Community Mining выделено 60% от саплая, поэтому нафар…
😠 На пиццу с разлоков точно хватит
Два дня назад колил шорт под разлок токена $0G, который должен был разлочить $5,7млн. Профит, по правде говоря, ожидал не такой быстрый, судя по их прошлым разлокам, но в этот раз все оказалось круче.
Если бы вы зашли на хорошей памп свече в день поста, около $0,243, то прямо сейчас могли бы закрыть сделку с 60+% профита (10х плечо). Холдить дальше или нет, решайте сами, но, судя …
😠 Сможет ли порадовать разлок $0G?
Буквально завтра можно будет лицезреть разлок токенов проекта 0G, который несмотря на хорошее состояние токена, не имеет особого веса и доверие со стороны комьюнити. Ранее при похожих разлоках прайс неплохо дампили, и на этом как раз мы можем заработать.
Самое главное тут ведь суммы, верно? Так вот, разлок будет на $5,75млн, а это около 10% от капы. Среди всего разлока можно увиде…
😠 Уолл-стрит не удивился летающей машине Tesla
Уверен, что с каждого утюга и из каждого видео в TikTok вы видели недавнюю презентацию Илона Маска и его спорткара Tesla Roadster 2, который на реактивных двигателях со сжатым воздухом от SpaceX проехал вверх ногами по рампе, подпрыгнул над Cybertruck и вовсе сделал переворот в воздухе. Такая инфа не может оставаться в тени, поэтому это вызвало реальный фурор среди обыч…
😠 Поймать приятный шортик с разлока дадут?
Через 12 часов, а точнее 17 октября, будет разлок токена $DBR. Прямо сейчас он котируется с капой в $37млн, суточным объёмом $2,7млн и FDV в $194млн, что дает понимание о довольно слабом токене по натуре.
Так вот, завтра будет разлок на $12,3млн, а это 35% от капы. В разлок будут входить токены как партнеров и контрибьюторов, так и комьюнити с экосистемой, поэтому в стакан…
🐳5🔥3👍2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @Crypto_Prime11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Crypto_Prime11 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @Crypto_Prime11 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
24 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Farm DeFi @Farm_DeFi · 23,667 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Crypto BOOM @booms_crypto · 21,425 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 October 2026
Off крипту @offfcrypto · 21,465 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 September 2026
CryptoNic @CryptoNicHouse · 25,337 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
Crypto-Крипта |News|Prop-Trading|Crypto projects️ @cryptonews_nft2023 · 40,157 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO PRIME” (@Crypto_Prime11), 15,862 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_Prime11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.