Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Инвестиции | Метод Роменского

Channel

Инвестиции | Метод Роменского

@romensky_metod

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,447subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001907780619
TypeChannel
Username@romensky_metod
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/romensky_metod

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,4473,4943,470.57 August 2026 — 3,494 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,492 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,490 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,486 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,479 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,476 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,474 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,472 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,469 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,462 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,458 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,453 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,447 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,440–3,501 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:183,447-6
12 Sept 2026, 09:553,453-5
8 Sept 2026, 11:153,458-4
3 Sept 2026, 00:273,462-7
30 Aug 2026, 15:543,469-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:243,472-2
24 Aug 2026, 15:173,474-2
20 Aug 2026, 23:223,476-3
18 Aug 2026, 04:123,479-7
15 Aug 2026, 01:043,486-4
11 Aug 2026, 14:313,490-2
8 Aug 2026, 10:073,492-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:173,494first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

380 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17445.8%
🔥12031.6%
❤8221.6%
👏41.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 380 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 24 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @romensky_metod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2025 to 24 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Oct 2025, 10:53 UTCviews —

Инвестиции | Метод Роменского pinned «Завтра (25.10.2025) в 11.00 проведу повторный про Инсайдеров. Буду продавать. Но не воздух. Во-первых, подробно расскажу вам о том, что из себя представляют "Инсайдеры" Во-вторых, подробно расскажу о том, чем мы там занимаемся. В-третьих, честно и…»

24 Oct 2025, 10:52 UTC≈1,790 views14 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

Завтра (25.10.2025) в 11.00 проведу повторный про Инсайдеров. Буду продавать. Но не воздух. Во-первых, подробно расскажу вам о том, что из себя представляют "Инсайдеры" Во-вторых, подробно расскажу о том, чем мы там занимаемся. В-третьих, честно и без купюр подсвечу наши текущие успехи и наши неудачи. Ну и конечно же анонсирую локальную учебную программу по DEFI; ончейн-анализу и срочному рынку. По результатам …

❤6👍6🔥2

6 Oct 2025, 20:18 UTC≈1,890 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какие темы были бы интересны? Речь идет о полноценных записях: от часа, как мы любим.

  1. Исторические темы в разрезе финансов/экономики/финансовых рынков11%
  2. Экономическая теория / теория фин.рынков18%
  3. Интересные форензик-кейсы формата экономико-финансовых расследований?11%
  4. Все вместе51%
  5. Вообще не воспринимаю аудио10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍12❤1

6 Oct 2025, 20:18 UTC≈1,520 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Есть у меня, что в чате, что в личке, что в боте определенное количество таких месседжей. Приятно конечно, но вопросы у меня к вам некоторые имеются! Слушаете ли вы в принципе подкасты (не мои, а вообще?!) 🔥 - да, самый предпочтительный для меня формат ✍️ - не слушаю в принципе, неудобно

🔥25

30 Sept 2025, 05:57 UTC≈1,570 views21 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

30.09.2025 в 19.00 проведу веб, где мы с вами: 1. Поговорим о крипто. 2. Поговорим о классике. 3. Поговорим о макро И обо всем , что нас так волнует : печалит и веселит ! Ссылка на регистрацию здесь: https://romenskiy.online/invest Всех жду ! P/S Фокус будем брать на ончейн, ибо тут будет очень интересно.

👍14❤7

22 Aug 2025, 09:13 UTC≈2,310 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

МОЖЕТ ЛИ НЕЙРОСЕТЬ ПРИНЕСТИ НАМ ПРИБЫЛЬ?⁉️ Коллеги, в нашем авторском канале запустили эксперимент с автоматической торговлей с помощью нейросети. Кому интересно посмотреть, заработаем мы с помощью ИИ или потерпим поражение, подписывайтесь на канал и следите за развитием событий😁 https://t.me/expectordiv

❤2

8 Aug 2025, 08:25 UTC≈2,010 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍7❤1

7 Aug 2025, 08:16 UTC≈1,690 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вопросики к вебинару копятся. Налоги, на самом деле, очень важный аспект в рамках 115-ФЗ. В нашей российской действительности преобладает мнение, что лучше жить так, чтобы налоговая о тебе ничего не знала. В целом, тезис весьма и весьма спорный - особенно, если ты понимаешь, каким образом работает система и к чему она стремиться. Первое, что необходимо уяснить каждому: финансовый мониторинг - это живой организм, …

🔥15❤1

5 Aug 2025, 07:02 UTC≈1,060 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Первичный банковский запрос по 115-ФЗ ПРАКТИЧЕСКИ НИКОГДА не содержит в себе конкретики. Почему? Мнений по этому поводу великое множество: начиная с теорий заговора, заканчивая нежеланием напрягаться в каждом частном случае, следуя закону сохранения энергии. Я не буду сейчас углубляться в нюансы, ибо большое количество статических элементов стали таковыми просто потому, что так исторически сложилось. (например, су…

👍17❤1

4 Aug 2025, 09:05 UTC832 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

08.08.2025 - уже совсем близко! Отвечаю на вопросы, которые прилетели в боте и мне в личку: 1. Кому будет полезен вебинар? - в первую очередь криптанам. Обычные пользователи и потребители финансовых услуг, как правило, со 115-ФЗ и 161-ФЗ сталкиваются крайне редко. 2. Вы просто расскажите о том, что такое 115-ФЗ или я получу какую-то методику? - цели атаковать ваши уши лапшой у меня нет, поэтому буду максимально ко…

🔥8❤3👍3

31 Jul 2025, 15:25 UTC≈1,070 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Продолжаю умничать на тему 115-го! Напоминаю, что ответом на банковский запрос вы должны закрыть три возражения: 1. Источник образования ДС. 2. Экономический смысл операций. 3. Факт уплаченных налогов. Источник образования ДС - это такая магическая штука, которая, при правильном заклинании, может убить двух зайцев сразу: и рассказать откуда деньги, и поведенческий профиль "усилить". Мой тезис: чем больше источни…

❤9👍2

30 Jul 2025, 16:03 UTC977 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Продолжаем погружение в 115-ФЗ. ЛЛЛЛОНГРИД, но важный. Я часто говорил вам, что на юристах в гражданке лучше не экономить. И это, в общем-то, верное утверждение, но сюда необходимо внести корректировки. Перед прочтением - ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО посмотрите видео выше. Когда у вас возникает какая-то неприятная ситуация формата "гражданского спора", то самый главный вопрос, который вы должны задать себе ПЕРЕД ТЕМ, как выход…

👍15❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @romensky_metod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Oct 2025, 20:18 UTCAnonymous Poll210 voters

Какие темы были бы интересны? Речь идет о полноценных записях: от часа, как мы любим.

  1. Исторические темы в разрезе финансов/экономики/финансовых рынков11%
  2. Экономическая теория / теория фин.рынков18%
  3. Интересные форензик-кейсы формата экономико-финансовых расследований?11%
  4. Все вместе51%
  5. Вообще не воспринимаю аудио10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2025, 15:50 UTCAnonymous Poll202 voters

Как оцениваете этот демарш во славу справедливости?

  1. Так им и надо, юрист - молодец!39%
  2. Радуюсь за клиента!14%
  3. Не одобряю такое: с банками лучше не ругаться.15%
  4. Хочу посмотреть ответы остальных33%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 24 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CryptoKogan
@cryptokogan · 40,906
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Московские партнеры
@moscow_partners_invest · 28,628
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
Евгений Коган l Личный блог l Не только про инвестиции
@TotSamyiKogan · 54,432
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
ПРОСНИСЬ🧿
@mtrwellbeing · 29,923
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инвестиции | Метод Роменского” (@romensky_metod), 3,447 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romensky_metod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.