Надіюсь хоть хтось зміг, я не зміг, в мене поза була 0.0026 на 50+ тисяч баксів, я вийшов около б/у бо набрав забагато. Основне в краймах не набирати повні кармани, тоді сидіти простіше.
custom 527419571465670766815👍5😁5

Channel
@enjoy_crypto_guild
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,172subscribers
-106 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001502820202 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enjoy_crypto_guild |
| Description | 🔥 Якщо не працює силка - пишіть в пошук тг CryptoEnjoy 🔥 ЧАТ - https://t.me/enjoy_guild 🔥 РЕКЛАМА - @enjoy_cooperation (promotion) 🔥 ПЛАТНІ АМА - @MORE_BLOOD_ME Розбан і всі питання по чату - @SilentBread |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enjoy_crypto_guild |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 27,172 | -15 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 27,187 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 27,205 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 27,217 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 27,224 | -26 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 27,250 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 27,268 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 27,278 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (19 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 188,000 |
| Reactions total | 3,153 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
3,153 reactions across 25 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 1,423 | 45.1% | |
| 👍 | 943 | 29.9% | |
| custom 5274195714656707668 | 700 | 22.2% | |
| 👎 | 87 | 2.76% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @enjoy_crypto_guild. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Надіюсь хоть хтось зміг, я не зміг, в мене поза була 0.0026 на 50+ тисяч баксів, я вийшов около б/у бо набрав забагато. Основне в краймах не набирати повні кармани, тоді сидіти простіше.
custom 527419571465670766815👍5😁5
Разбір ситуації з rtUsq. Багато хто написав як можна було заробити, а я напишу як можна було проєбати. я відкупив оба токена, і оба рагнулись, на цьому все. мінус 130 доларів, дякую за увагу. а хто заробив то всі піздуни, не вірте їм, ніхто не заробив.
👍55😁26custom 52741957146567076684
я до Вас з оффером! пару днів тому писав за кракен поінти, тепер можна норм написати постік про це.. Мені дали якусь супермега віпку на кракен, де дають дохуя бека комісій і плюшок, я давно не писав сюди нічого корисного тому готовий відавати вам весь % що мені надходить з цього + всі виплати, якщо вам цікаво фармити токени ці ( мені приходить 20% з вас, це я не відаю, це буде те за що я працюю) , всі умови на жаль…
😁35👍10👎9custom 52741957146567076686
Шо ви работяги)) як думаєте цей місяць в плюс закрию?) Там ще кстаті оффер для вас скоро буде прикольний, там на кракені можу вам відавати оч дохуя комси( сильно більше 50% на обєм, я як завжди наживатись на вас не буду) , можна поінти крутити, постік з математикою завтра напишу а то тільки встав, якщо комусь там треба партнерка на кракен на 55% пишіть в лс дам
👍63custom 527419571465670766829😁13
Я більше не можу терпіти ці пекельні борошна.. ЗАЄБАЛО п2п бінансу, сука кожен гандон виводить або сутки, або тисячу транз ще і каже пиши кожну копійку що я скинув, останній раз я виводив 2 дні, до цього юзав моно кредит і гасив його, але бля в мене реально вже горить очко, ще і сука кента в дорозі завжди проcив заплатити за мене, бо не виводили, кароче в Грузії коли був взагалі 5 раз відмінили транзи з п2п бінансу…
😁90custom 527419571465670766850👍13👎3
Потрохи вертаю статус лудомана! Щас досвіда ще трохи наберусь і буду щось Мб сюди кидати.. Зараз в арбітражі і меми відкупаю, та займаюсь всякою хуйнею що і всі, з крипти не пропав просто писати темку яка живе 0.1 сек нема сенсу я сам не завжди встигаю набратись, типу нема сенсу від поста геть, хіба постфактами писати. Також граю кс.. Почитав свій канал за ласт пару місяців ноль корисних колів саме по крипті, але …
👍64custom 527419571465670766824😁8
Ще тут прикольчик, вперше бачу таке на бінанс такий токен.. 1) токен не показує капу в розділі, таке часто буває пішов з пк копіювати символ і через декс шукати 龙虾, знайшов капа мала, по певним приколам яким я часто заходжу вирішив що треба зайти, і забив. 2) Вдень вирішив глянути а мб там є причина пампу, зайшов в твіттер і ахуєв https://x.com/lobstercoinbnb 125 підписників і 3 поста. 3) ну думаю зайду в телеграм…
😁80👍11custom 52741957146567076683👎1
Проєбав лайфчендж 05.08. Сука давно такої дізморалі не було як сьогодні, напевно з часів 10.10 коли пів єбала відкинуло.. Колись мб репостну історію про це..
😁61👎21custom 527419571465670766813👍6
Спредік 0.5% кидаю кістку, працюємо https://www.bybit.com/en/trade/usdt/COTIUSDT https://www.kucoin.com/trade/COTI-USDT просто я хворію,нема як писати розумні пости, прийдеться писати як заробити
😁31custom 52741957146567076689👍6
Photo, posted without a caption
😁130👍20custom 527419571465670766810👎2
та сука, я хуй більше 25 слів пост напишу, заєбали, хоч в цьому каналі читати вас заставляю ви і так ніхуя не розвиваєтесь, мені не приємно
custom 5274195714656707668195😁119👍58👎14
ЧОМУ ВІН А НЕ Я? Часто замислювались над цим питанням? я ось часто, коли бачу бізнеси\продукти\мільйонерів які на мою думку є мягко кажучи не досить компетентними в своїй ніші, сьогодні я цілий день фейспалмлю після інтерв*ю Міші з СЕО SL8, ну це блять як стендап скоріше, дивитись не раджу, відчуваєш себе занудним дауном, але кому треба силка то ТУТ Я думаю ви бачили багато хто з укр інфлів заносив на платформу ht…
👍326custom 5274195714656707668145😁75👎16
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @enjoy_crypto_guild. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 59,328 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoEnjoy 🍀” (@enjoy_crypto_guild), 27,172 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enjoy_crypto_guild.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.