#информация

Channel
Англоязычное SEO
@burzhunet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,465subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001272357680 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @burzhunet |
| Description | Полезные материалы по англоязычному SEO, отобранные вручную. ✍️ Чат @shakinchat. Админ @mikeshakin |
| Created | 16 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/burzhunet |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 7,465 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 7,468 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.89%
- avg views ÷ 7,465 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 514
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.796%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,858 |
| Reactions total | 84 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈588
- Videos
- ≈8
- Links
- ≈2,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 15.7% | |
| ✍ | 7 | 10.0% | |
| 🆒 | 7 | 10.0% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 10.0% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 8.57% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 8.57% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @burzhunet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🦸♂️Super Links представляют супер дешевые ссылки с Super PBN!💨 🆕Услуги по PBN! - 📝Гостевые Посты на PBN (Dofollow, коентент делеаем мы + год гарантии) - $1,5; - 📝Гостевые Посты на Premium PBN (Dofollow, коентент делеаем мы + год гарантии) - $2,5; - ⛓️Сквозные в Сайдбарах PBN (Dofollow+ год гарантии) - $10. ⚡️Про наши PBN! 1⃣Это самые дешевые ссылки с PBN, которые существуют на сегодняшний день; 2⃣Гарантия от уда…
❤1🆒1
👨🏫 Основная формула GIST Формула GIST: полезность + разнообразие. Как работает алгоритм поиска изнутри? Что стоит за формулой GIST и почему весь алгоритм поиска строится именно вокруг неё? Смотрите видео DrMax @drmaxseo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJAWzS6u0N8 Полная версия вебинара: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3djkSrTHZLg https://vkvideo.ru/video-238145611_456239034 https://dzen.ru/video/watch/6a51d882a0…
❤2👌2🤓1
🧫 Автоматическая проверка файла sitemap: пошаговая инструкция и готовый инструмент Ильхом Чакканбаев @seopulses показывает, как быстро находить проблемные URL в sitemap до того, как они попадут в индекс. Готовый инструмент сразу выдаёт список ошибок, без ручной проверки. 00:00 Вступление 00:14 Подготовка 05:34 Тестовая проверка 09:47 Разбор проблемных ошибок https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnrDvNz8aA8 Ссылка на и…
👌2✍1🆒1
🤩 Автоматизированный линкбилдинг через поиск битых ссылок с помощью Claude и Kimi K3 Подробный разбор метода broken link building с использованием AI-агентов: Claude управляет воркфлоу, а Kimi K3 выступает как sub-agent для поиска мёртвых страниц конкурентов, проверки 404-ошибок, воссоздания контента и автоматизации аутрича. Полный процесс с разбором инструментов и стоимости данных (Ahrefs vs. Distribb). 0:00 Почем…
🔥3⚡1🆒1
#информация
🏷Мега ОПТ под оптовые закупки ссылок и для перепродажи - дешево, но качественно! Magic Links Premium Качества (цена в месяц): - от 200-1000 ссылок — $0,30; - от 1000 ссылок — $0,25; - от 10000 ссылок — $0,20; - от 50000 ссылок — $0,15; - от 100000 ссылок — $0,10. Ссылки с Главных (цена в месяц): - от 10 ссылок — $9; - от 30 ссылок — $8,5; - от 100 ссылок — $8; - от 200 ссылок — $7; - от 500 ссылок — $6,5. Сквозны…
👏2⚡1❤1🆒1
🔄 Query Fan-Out в AI-поиске: что нужно знать Самуэль Шмитт объясняет механизм query fan-out — когда один запрос к Google AI Mode, Perplexity или ChatGPT автоматически разбивается на несколько параллельных подзапросов, а результаты собираются в один ответ. Если ваш контент не присутствует в покрытии хотя бы одного из этих подзапросов, вы полностью отсутствуете в ответе нейросети, а не просто оказываетесь на второй ст…
👍2❤1💯1
📔 Техпроцесс SEO-продвижения в Google: пошаговая стратегия роста сайта (урок 1) Первый урок курса от Александра Сергиенко @AleksSergienkoSEO. В этом уроке: — как быстро диагностировать проект и выбрать приоритетные страницы; — когда нужен полноценный аудит, а когда достаточно точечной доработки; — где в стратегии находятся контент, E-E-A-T, ссылки, дропы, редиректы, Xrumer и Tier 2/3; — как по реакции позиций понят…
☃1✍1❤1👍1👻1
📎 Управление ссылочным профилем: как проводить аудит, мониторинг и наращивать ссылки Практическое руководство Мэттью Вудварда по управлению ссылочным профилем в 5 шагов. Главная проблема в том, что 66,5% ссылок со временем исчезают, поэтому линкбилдинг требует постоянного внимания, а не разового подхода. Backlink Management: How To Audit, Monitor & Grow Links https://linksthatrank.com/blog/backlink-management/ Ми…
❤2✍1👌1
#информация
Коллеги, приветствую. На связи Пётр Лях. Последние годы одно из основных направлений меня и моей студии Филигрань это линкбилдинг и PBN. Мы развиваем свою сеть ссылочных доноров, используем её для продвижения проектов заказчиков и видим результаты в кейсах и отзывах. Уже более 3-х лет я регулярно выступаю у Михаила Шакина на вебинарах по разным темам. За это время разобрали многие вопросы по ссылкам и не только, ни…
⚡2🆒1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @burzhunet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 199,482 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@seopodcasts · 32013 postsAneti
@aneti_ru · 32 postsSEOReader
@SEOReader · 52 postsSEO - и - Маркетинг🔥
@seoxprt · 82 postsНовости SEO (важное)
@best_seo_news · 4791 postБирюков Артем о SEO
@biryukovseo · 3341 postBLACK SEO (RU+ENG) Doorways
@black_seo · 5451 postИлья Найденов - Маркетплейсы, SEO PBN, бизнес
@NajdenovIV · 341 postСайты под бурж 💵 | Кравцов Виталий
@podburzh · 3701 postDasha PRO Marketing
@pro_target_pro · 3341 postRocket Academy — блог Ильи Горбачева про SEO и интернет-маркетинг
@rocket_academy_pro · 1,9691 postSEOFAQ Telegram
@seofaqt · 2,2671 postSEO-катушка
@seokatushka · 1471 postaltblog - трудовые будни
@seopyt · 2541 postSEO-репосты
@seoreposts · 1321 postnews
@Xi22XDDrXdo2YWY6 · 21 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@drmaxseo · 9,5132 postsSEO подкасты Шакина
@seopodcasts · 3202 postsSEO вебинары Шакина
@shakinweb · 1,7602 postsSuper Links - Супер Дешевые Ссылки
@super_links_seo · 1692 postsРезультативное SEO
@Windakolit_Public · 3,1182 postsАлександр Сергиенко | Про SEO для бизнеса
@AleksSergienkoSEO · 2,5991 postSEO Pulses | Чакканбаев Ильхом
@seopulses · 5801 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Англоязычное SEO” (@burzhunet), 7,465 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/burzhunet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.