Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Александр Сергиенко | Про SEO для бизнеса

Channel

Александр Сергиенко | Про SEO для бизнеса

@AleksSergienkoSEO

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,599subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001727483211
TypeChannel
Username@AleksSergienkoSEO
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AleksSergienkoSEO

Growth

2,5862,5992,592.56 August 2026 — 2,586 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,586 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,587 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,592 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,593 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,599 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,584–2,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:352,599+6
12 Aug 2026, 14:152,593+1
9 Aug 2026, 21:312,592+5
6 Aug 2026, 23:322,587+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:222,586no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:062,586first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.4%
avg views ÷ 2,599 subscribers
Avg views / post
557
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (8 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,344
Reactions total140
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
53m 38s
Average length
17m 53s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

285 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥19167.0%
👍5519.3%
3110.9%
👏82.81%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AleksSergienkoSEO. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC281 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💥 УРОК 3. ПОЧЕМУ КУПЛЕННАЯ ССЫЛКА ЕЩЁ НИЧЕГО НЕ ГАРАНТИРУЕТ Когда я начинал заниматься SEO, во многих нишах хватало базовых действий: разместил несколько ссылок, немного доработал сайт - и получил рост. Сейчас и конкуренция другая, и алгоритмы стали намного сложнее. Поисковик давно научился видеть массовые биржевые схемы и не обязан учитывать ссылку только потому, что вы за неё заплатили. В новом уроке разобрал:

🔥8👍32

4 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC418 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💥 УРОК 2. ССЫЛКИ В GOOGLE НЕ УМЕРЛИ. УМЕРЛО ПРИМИТИВНОЕ ССЫЛОЧНОЕ Периодически вижу очередной прогноз, что ссылки вот-вот перестанут работать. На наших проектах картина другая: в Google ссылочное по-прежнему даёт рост. Но купить 10 ссылок по 100 рублей и обогнать сайт, который пять лет размещался на сильных площадках, строил PBN и усиливал статьи уровнями, уже не получится. Конкуренция стала плотнее, поэтому и п

🔥93👍3

1 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC599 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💥 УРОК 1. ЧТО ДЕЛАТЬ С ПРОЕКТОМ, ЧТОБЫ ОН НАЧАЛ РАСТИ Часто вижу одну и ту же историю: на сайте немного поправили техническую часть, добавили тексты, купили несколько ссылок и ждут роста. Позиции не выросли - значит, SEO не работает или ссылки плохие)) Но проблема обычно в другом: все действия существуют отдельно и вообще не собраны в единый процесс. В первом уроке показываю полную карту продвижения сайта в Googl

🔥12👍84

31 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC622 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тук-тук)), завтра старт, вступайте в чат канала: [ссылка на чат], чтобы задать свои вопросы по ходу видео, автоматом в чат не вступить, есть модерация (не быстрая).

👍6

28 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC757 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥 ОБЪЯВЛЯЮ АВГУСТ МЕСЯЦЕМ ССЫЛОК — ВЫКЛАДЫВАЮ БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ SEO-КУРС В SEO я с 2013 года. Когда начинал, нормальную информацию собирали по щепоткам: форумы, финстрипы, чужие тесты, свои проекты. Что-то проверили - полетело, оставили. Не полетело - пошли дальше. Сейчас обратная проблема. Информации тонны, курсов еще больше, а человек открывает проект и всё равно не понимает: что делать первым, что вторым и где вообще в

🔥50👍4👏41

24 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC667 views23 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дисцилина, честность, проактивность, технологичность За последние полгода произошло не мало изменений, но фокус основной на развитие своих уникальных инструментов. С начала года я начал изучать n8n и пилить систему при помощи команды программистов и параллельно занялся вайбкодингом. Через n8n сделали полноценный генератор контента, но сама система морально устарела, так как opus 4.8, а позже fable 5 - бесподобен.

🔥10👍84👏1

15 Jul 2026, 08:51 UTC784 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥 Кейс: рост видимости с 1–2% до 52–53% в Google за месяц Ниша интересная - сервис определения местоположения по номеру телефона. Запросы специфичные: местоположение по номеру телефона, отследить телефон по номеру, поиск человека по номеру телефона. Проблема в таких проектах обычно не в спросе. Спрос есть. Проблема в том, чтобы Google понял, какую страницу под какие запросы тащить вверх: что это за сервис, какая ст

🔥6👍3👏2

8 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC954 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Про опыт прохождения обучений в seo... Помню как начинал свой путь в SEO, изучал кучу всякой инфы, тогда еще финстрипы всякие были, бомжи...)) Кто помнит, тот помнит)) Создал свой блог в 2013 годы, а ныне сайт агентства (можете по вебархиву посмотреть что там было), было мало инфы про seo, по щепоткам собирали, что-то тестировали и все +- залетало, сейчас другая история... Информации - тонны и хз кого читать, С ЧЕГ

🔥655👍5

6 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC950 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥 Кейс: рост видимости в Google для B2B-ниши корпоративных подарков Ниша конкурентная - в выдаче каталоги, крупные поставщики сувенирки, рекламно-производственные компании. Задача была закрепиться сразу по группе коммерческих кластеров. Услуга: Многоуровневые редиректы + закупка ссылок Количество: 8 шт + 10 шт Бюджет: 180 000 р Гео: Россия Поисковая система: Google Срок: 3 месяца 📈 Результат по данным Ahrefs: — 7,

🔥5👍41👏1

30 Jun 2026, 07:01 UTC904 views19 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥Пересборка процесса прогона Xrumer С начала мая произошло ряд изменений как в алгоритмах Гугла, эффективности прогонов, так и в парсинге ahrefs.com. Если раньше (2022-2023гг) мы могли сделать прогон, собрать многоуровневый редирект, вклеить 2-3 таких и гарантированно получить рост по позициям - сейчас такого нет. Но это нормально. Это не только связано с тем, что алгоритмы поисковых систем совершенствуются, но и с

👍8🔥65

15 Jun 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,120 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥Свежий кейс по редиректам (сайта практически не было в выдаче) Сайта практически не было в выдаче. После 2-х подклеек многоуровневыми редиректами удалось добиться существенных позитивных изменений в виде роста количества позиций, трафика и лидов! Как видите, методика работает, особенно это видно в нишах со слабой конкуренцией, там 1-2 подклейки и все стоит в ТОПе. Но следует отметить, что и под капотом, много чег

🔥134👍3

8 Jun 2026, 03:49 UTC≈1,100 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥 Как мы помогли усилить проекты команды Rush Agency и какие результаты получили! Отдельно хотим поблагодарить команду Rush Agency за доверие 🚀 Другие отзывы по нашим услугам: здесь Хотите также? 🤝 Пишите в директ - @alex28serg

🔥72

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @AleksSergienkoSEO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 14,349 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Александр Сергиенко | Про SEO для бизнеса” (@AleksSergienkoSEO), 2,599 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AleksSergienkoSEO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.