频道适合看内容,群组更适合继续交流。 SOSO 可以直接找热门群组,也能按关键词搜同类圈子。 先打开看看当前推荐。 🔗 本频道专属邀请链接 https://t.me/sosoo?start=autopromo_-1001221426833_7819687274_groups_74b70fa0

Channel
东南亚大事件(曝光)
@bg874
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
102,748subscribers
+3,830 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001221426833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bg874 |
| Description | 🌏 聚焦东南亚热点事件与海外华人动态 揭露真相|追踪曝光|分享最新新闻与故事 🇰🇭 🇵🇭 🇲🇲 🇦🇪 东南亚真实现场:柬埔寨、菲律宾、缅甸、迪拜 📢 投稿爆料合作: @yida89 #东南亚 #华人 #新闻 #曝光 #爆料 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #迪拜 #斯里兰卡 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bg874 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 102,748 | -2,287 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 105,035 | -332 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:55 | 105,367 | -403 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 105,770 | -227 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:02 | 105,997 | -446 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 106,443 | -1,223 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 107,666 | -1,023 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 108,689 | +9,169 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:43 | 99,520 | -191 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:05 | 99,711 | -1,121 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 100,832 | -1,022 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 101,854 | -264 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 102,118 | -428 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 102,546 | -350 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 102,896 | +19,384 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 83,512 | -123 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 83,635 | -144 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 83,779 | -388 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 84,167 | -346 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 84,513 | first reading |
Engagement
1,260 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.904%
- avg views ÷ 102,748 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 929
- 641 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.322%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 730
- of 1,260 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 337 of 641 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,260 (7 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 595,210 |
| Reactions total | 923 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 22:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈22,100
- Videos
- ≈4,590
- Links
- ≈118
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 32m
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 244 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
945 reactions across 359 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤩 | 129 | 13.7% | |
| ❤ | 120 | 12.7% | |
| 👍 | 111 | 11.7% | |
| 🎉 | 105 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 100 | 10.6% | |
| 👏 | 99 | 10.5% | |
| 😁 | 99 | 10.5% | |
| 🥰 | 94 | 9.95% | |
| ⚡ | 83 | 8.78% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.212% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.212% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.106% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 360 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 945 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 17 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#小姐姐投稿:别人谈恋爱讲究的是感觉,我谈恋爱讲究的是现实。 在搞对象和搞钱之间,我认真研究了一下,最后决定:对象可以慢慢搞,钱还是得先搞。 毕竟爱情不会主动给我发工资,月底房租也不会因为我深情就打个折。 看电视剧《插翅难逃》这类港片,多少有点学到张世豪那股劲儿。人家想的是怎么搞大事,我想的是怎么把自己的日子过明白。 人可以有野心,但不能光有野心,银行卡余额才是最诚实的观众。 尤其是干狗推这一行,天天面对的不是诗和远方,是业绩、客户、工资和月底的生活费。别人晚上失眠是因为对象不回消息,我失眠是因为客户不回消息。一个是情感问题,一个是收入问题,怎么选其实已经很明显了。 当然,我也不是不相信爱情,只是现在的我比较现实。年轻的时候可以为爱情冲动,到了这个年纪,至少得先让自己有点底气。 没钱的时候,连说一句“我养你”都像是在给自己挖坑,最后可能不是养对象,是对象养成了前任。 所以现在的我想得很简单:先搞钱,再谈爱;先把自…
#网友投稿:最近看到不少人在讨论:持港澳通行证进入香港后,再拿护照乘飞机前往第三国,会不会被限制出境? 其实很多争议,是把航空公司查验证件和香港出境检查混在了一起。如果是持港澳通行证合法进入香港,之后从香港机场乘国际航班前往第三国,办理值机、登机及相关手续时,航空公司通常会根据目的地要求查验护照、签证及机票; 而办理香港出境手续时,则应使用与入境记录相对应的旅行证件,也就是入境香港时使用的港澳通行证。 简单来说就是:通行证负责香港的入境、出境记录;护照主要用于国际航班及目的地入境手续
听过结婚一毛不剩的,没听过洗脚、按摩、商K把自己整到倾家荡产的。 在东南亚混久了才发现,真正能让你破产的,可能不是结婚,而是那句——“今晚放松一下,哥安排。” 白天公司里谈业绩,晚上扶手一坐,嘴里喊着“最后一场”,手机余额却在一场一场地消失。 刚开始:消费是为了缓解压力。后来:没钱了就更想消费。再后来:工资还没发,扶手已经坐熟了。 别人来东南亚是想赚点钱,咱们倒好,工资负责进账,扶手负责清零。 以前总觉得“上岸”是离开园区,后来才明白,人坐在扶手上,钱已经先上岸了。 东南亚最可怕的不是工资低,是你辛辛苦苦赚一个月,几个晚上就给消费明白了
🥰1
#群友求助:8号园区做过国内业务的有没有事?监控会不会曝光?现在很担心,一直不敢回去。 我是26年2月份走的,前几天看到有报道说监控被曝光,所以现在一直不敢回去,在金三角苟且偷生。想知道个答案,之前一起做事的现在一个都联系不上了
#群友投稿:入境泰国的真实反馈,海关问什么 第一问:现金 第二问:酒店 第三问:离泰机票 第四问:去哪里玩,至少说3个以上的地名 第五问:做什么工作,怎么证明 海关问问题是不会给你缓冲的,哪个问题答不上就让你去小黑屋。 温馨提示:千万不要找保关,这种属于机场灰产链条,这里有一个弊很多人都没有说出来,只要你保过一次你的护照在泰国各大机场就有记录,下次不管你用什么签证只要入境泰国都要保,相当于你已经自动变成长期客户。如果你不保在入境的时候工作人员的电脑会有弹窗也能查到记录,然后找个借口带你去办公室。 还有一点需要保关的人他心里清楚,自己是什么德行,正常人根本不需要。 盘问的问题也是取决于你最近1年之内入境泰国的次数,普通游客,半年去一次,1年去1-2次不用担心,盘问很少,有的航班不问。
🤩1
#群友投稿:以为出来东南亚能赚到并存到很多钱,但你有没有算过,自己为了那些推不掉的饭局和无用的社交,花了多少冤枉钱? 半年前,我看着钱包里只有三位数的余额,再看看账单里一笔笔消费,突然一阵心惊。那时候的我,每天过得看似热闹,白天上班,晚上和朋友喝酒、吐槽、点妹子。表面上灯红酒绿,好不热闹,实际上,身体一天比一天虚,钱包一天比一天空。 我以为我在享受生活,其实生活正把我往死里按。直到快连房租都付不起的那天,我才猛然惊醒:这种无效的自我消耗,正在废掉我的未来。 也就是从那天起,我决定放下面子,戒掉那些廉价的快感和无效社交。这半年来,我硬生生把所有精力收回来,死磕搞钱,一路掀翻了过去那个荒唐的自己。当看着钱包不断跳动的数字时,那种把人生方向盘死死握在自己手里的踏实感,真的,比以前喝多少场酒、点多少次妹子,都踏实、痛快一万倍! 最后想给各位网友提个醒:人在赚钱后,最忌讳在无用的社交里迷失自我。外面的世界再精彩,不如钱包里的余额实…
#群友投稿:入境泰国的真实反馈,海关问什么 第一问:现金 第二问:酒店 第三问:离泰机票 第四问:去哪里玩,至少说3个以上的地名 第五问:做什么工作,怎么证明 海关问问题是不会给你缓冲的,哪个问题答不上就让你去小黑屋。 温馨提示:千万不要找保关,这种属于机场灰产链条,这里有一个弊很多人都没有说出来,只要你保过一次你的护照在泰国各大机场就有记录,下次不管你用什么签证只要入境泰国都要保,相当于你已经自动变成长期客户。如果你不保在入境的时候工作人员的电脑会有弹窗也能查到记录,然后找个借口带你去办公室。 还有一点需要保关的人他心里清楚,自己是什么德行,正常人根本不需要。 盘问的问题也是取决于你最近1年之内入境泰国的次数,普通游客,半年去一次,1年去1-2次不用担心,盘问很少,有的航班不问
❤1
#网友投稿:太子集团某大哥在加拿大被绑架了一个多月,付了3000W赎金放出来了,据说这名大哥姓dai
🥰1
#群友求助:姓名:繁花糖水铺|身高:155cm 走失时间:2026年 9 月 21 日下午 走失地点:老挝万象三江中国城附近 据她本人描述跟两个女孩子去老挝万象考察项目想做点小生意之类的,其中一个女孩子据她说叫雅雅(图一为雅雅飞机)据其他人告诉可能还有一个男生叫左左(小左图二图三)也跟她在一起。 家里人非常的着急,如有具体关于她同行人或知道她在老挝情况的请联系,拜托帮忙转发
东南亚大事件(曝光) pinned a photo
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥸🥸🥸😅😞😉😉😉😝😝 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 信誉保障,大额无忧,赢的放心,出的舒心 😬全网上押3000万u担保 放心赢 😬 😬信誉保障,大客户最佳选择:U存U提 😬每日提款不限额 不限制次数 免实名 😬无限代理模式,业内最高佣金😶😬😬 🥸点击:查看充值多少送多少U 🥸 😅强烈推荐,i8平台,不要在玩野鸡平台😅 😅热门赛事 · 实时互动 · 多元玩法😅 👉 网站👌 i8.COM【 USDT 】 👈 👉 网站💴 i8.COM【人民币】 👈 👉 网站🏆 i8.COM【世界杯】 👈 😬官方客服 | 官方频道 |官方招商😬 😬官方飞投 | 福利频道 |官方直播😬 i8国际 #娱乐平台 #i8 #世界杯 #真人 #PG电子 #棋牌 #捕鱼 #彩票 #百家乐 彩金专员: @YYYbcyyy 本群每日限制5名 参加充值领取 6.66U
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,260 posts we hold for @bg874. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@i8gjzbj · 2,54535 postsi8国际 i8.COM
@i8i8 · 15,93535 postsi8.COM国际官方频道
@i8pd · 8,03235 postsi8国际娱乐 - 福利姬
@sdtptuu · 6,39935 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 19,99226 posts爆分频道-永利国际
@ylbf66 · 30522 posts永利国际-赌坛
@yonglidutan · 52,88122 postsrainbet精彩集锦
@Rainbetsvip · 22021 postsN9.COM|官方频道
@N9_com1 · 12,57016 postsN9.COM 福利频道导航
@n9pd888 · 7,71516 posts8K国际官方
@PG8K8K · 3,73814 posts8k国际官方频道
@vip8k090 · 5,25214 postsSOSO搜搜
@sosoo · 468,3149 posts🔥金贝娱乐场-jinbei.com-【官方招商】🔥
@jbzhaoshang · 4,9838 posts2G官方频道
@GF2Gcom · 6327 postsSOSO搜搜
@sooo · 541,1157 posts🌐 000 体育-官方频道
@ty000 · 6637 posts涩涩备用群💋(防丢失)
@SSBYQ · 3604 postsSOSO搜搜🔞
@SosoCnBot · 212,7443 postsSOSO搜搜
@sososo · 585,3672 postsSOSO搜搜
@souso · 576,8832 posts头条事件
@toutiaoshijian · 74,8841 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件(曝光)” (@bg874), 102,748 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bg874.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.