Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Meysam Karimi

@meyQuery

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

145subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001790102468
TypeChannel
Username@meyQuery
DescriptionMeysam Karimi | میثم کریمی پادکست رادیو باتن: @RadioButton_ir وب‌سایتم: https://bento.me/meyquery
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/meyQuery

Growth

1457 Aug 2026, 22:06 — 145 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:16 — 145 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:068 Aug 2026, 21:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:16145no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:06145first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.3%
avg views ÷ 145 subscribers
Avg views / post
65.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held18 (16 June 202519 July 2026)
Views total263
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
73
Videos
3
Links
74

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2449.0%
👍2449.0%
👎12.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC57 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @geeksesi

خودمم نمیدونم اینو از کجا دیدم الان ( پنج دقیقه پیش دیدم ولی یادم رفته) ولی یه چیز خیلی باحال زده گوگل به نام Codewiki. حالا چه کار می‌کنه ؟ من خیلی وقتا یه چالشی که دارم اینه که دنبال یه ,Repo یا یه آموزش خاص میگردم توی گیت هاب باید برم سرچ کنم کلی بگردم تاااا تازه یچی پیدا کنم. بعد بیام codebase رو بخونم بفهمم چه کار کرده و چه طور با نیاز های خودم هماهنگش کنم. Codewiki دقیقا اومده این نیاز رو برطرف کنه . حالا چه ط

19 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mrpvii

https://developer.chrome.com/docs/ai/built-in گوگل تو آپدیت‌های جدید کروم، مدل هوش مصنوعی Gemini Nano رو مستقیماً آورده داخل مرورگر. یعنی برای کارای کوچیک مثل خلاصه‌سازی متون، ترجمه یا چت، دیگه نیازی به سرور و API Key نداری؛ همه چیز کاملاً رایگان، آفلاین و روی کارت گرافیک کاربر پردازش میشه! مثلاً می‌تونی قابلیت خلاصه‌سازی خودکار مقالات یا ترجمه آنی کامنت‌ها رو بدون یک ریال هزینه سرور، فقط با چند خط جاوااسکریپت به ا

1

18 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hdshycomPhoto

یک سؤال خوب همیشه کافی نیست. گاهی لازم نیست سؤالت رو عوض کنی فقط باید به ChatGPT بگی چطور جواب بده. پرامپت Absolute Mode دقیقاً برای همین ساخته شده؛ جواب‌های مستقیم‌تر، کوتاه‌تر و بدون حاشیه اینو اول گفتگو بهش بده System Instruction: Absolute Mode Respond with direct, precise, and information-dense language. Eliminate emojis, filler, hype, hedging, conversational transitions, emotional softening, engagement optim

👍1

15 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC92 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

چطور مطوری؟! - چند کلمه در باب Check-in و Check-out در ساختار Holacracy امروز توی جلسه تاکتیکال، وقتی تسهیل‌گر برای Check-in ازم خواست حس و حالم رو بگم، گفتم: «بد» و در پایان جلسه وقتی حسم رو نسبت به جلسه پرسید، گفتم: «به‌مراتب بدتر از چیزی که در ابتدای جلسه بودم» همین بهانه‌ای شد که دوباره خیلی کوتاه درباره مفهوم Check-in و Check-out در هولاکراسی بخونم تا مطمئن شم دارم درست انجامش می‌دم. تعریف Check-in قبل از

👍3

11 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC132 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

آقای کلاد، الان وقت ban کردن گله‌ای نبود؛ یه چک می‌کردی می‌فهمیدی من چه‌قدر خوب از این اکانت استفاده کرده بودم!

4👍2👎1

6 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC175 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

تجربه امروز: حواس‌تون باشه کانال‌تون رو با Saved Messagesتون اشتباه نگیرید! :دی

3👍1

27 Nov 2025, 20:01 UTC396 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

بزرگوار Gary John Bishop نویسنده کتاب Stop Doing That Shit می‌گه: Someone once asked me, "What's at the core of every human being?" "Bullshit", I replied. همین‌طوری دلبری می‌کنه که دوسش دارم 😌

2

17 Oct 2025, 18:17 UTC469 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

توی فصل چهارم کتاب مهم‌ها را بسنجید می‌گه که: «در نظرسنجی صورت‌گرفته میان ۱۱ هزار مدیر ارشد و عوامل اجرایی سازمان‌ها، اکثرا نمی‌توانستند اصلی‌ترین اولویت‌های سازمان‌شان را نام ببرند؛ تا جایی که نیمی از این افراد حتی یکی از اولویت‌هایشان را هم نمی‌دانستند.» حالا این نظرسنجی چی رو نشون می‌ده؟ لزوم تاکید بر ارتباطات شفاف.

👍6

8 Oct 2025, 21:17 UTC481 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

اگر مقصدتان را ندانید، احتمالا به آن‌جا نمی‌رسید این نقل قول از یوگی برا رو زیر عنوان فصل اول کتاب مهم‌ها را بسنجید دیدم. با توجه به موضوع کتاب حدس می‌زدم مربوط به یک فرد مهم در حوزه مدیریت باشه؛ ولی این‌طور نبود. یوگی برا بازیکن، مربی و مدیر مشهور در لیگ حرفه‌ای بیسبال (MLB) بود که یکی از پرافتخارترین بازیکن‌های تاریخ این لیگه و به نقل‌قول‌های خاصش معروفه. شخصیت یوگی الهام‌بخش فیلم‌های مختلفی بوده و در سال ۲۰۲۲ م

3👍2

29 Sept 2025, 14:45 UTC421 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚶🏻 همیشه در حال ترک کردن باشید! منظور این نیست که مدام به فکر ترک شغل‌تان باشید. بلکه منظور این است که طوری عمل کنید که انگار این امکان وجود دارد که همین فردا تیم یا پروژه خود را ترک کنید. به بیان دیگر، خودتان را قابل جایگزینی (Replaceable) کنید. کلید ماجرا در این است که ضروری نباشی. اگر باشی، تا زمانی که آن شغل کارکرد دارد، در آن شغل گیر خواهی کرد و فرصت کمی برای رشد خواهی داشت. و وقتی شغل غیرضروری شود، جایگاه شغل

4👍2

27 Aug 2025, 14:21 UTC350 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/bIBUGQ0aYnc?si=mO6id_Df4WZTWlge نظریه اینترنت زنده

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @meyQuery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Meysam Karimi” (@meyQuery), 145 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meyQuery.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.