Channel
@philipacademy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
760subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001387232114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @philipacademy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/philipacademy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 760 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 759 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (28 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,892 |
| Reactions total | 86 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
126 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 38.9% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 29.4% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 9.52% | |
| custom 5201662169522937604 | 11 | 8.73% | |
| ☃ | 5 | 3.97% | |
| custom 5202202454933937020 | 3 | 2.38% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 2.38% | |
| custom 5201892444194511380 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| custom 5202126803379985437 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.59% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как устроены наши пробные занятия? Вот как прошел вчерашний урок для 4 класса: Задачка: Три кошки 😺😺😺 и три собаки 🐕🐕🐕 хотят переправиться через реку. В лодке 🛶 помещается только двое. Как только на берегу собак будет больше, чем кошек, начнётся драка 🥊. Как им всем переправиться? Я рисую лодочку, персонажей и прошу ребят делать ходы по очереди. Задачка не очень сложная, и тут мне важно создать атмосферу совместно…
❤6🔥3
Кружок Филиппа — приключения и математика! pinned a photo
Открыта запись на бесплатные пробные занятия на этой неделе! 🦊 Творческая математика с Филиппом — для активных и любознательных ребят! Никаких рецептов "эта задача решается так". Ребята сами исследуют и изобретают — а в конце каждого занятия игра! 👂 Пробные занятия для ребят, перешедших в.. ⭐️ 2 клаcc: суббота (8 августа), 10:30 по Берлину 🎲 3-4 класс: воскресенье (9 августа), 12:00 по Берлину ⚽️ 4-5 класс: пят…
❤6🔥3
Ещё пара слов о упаковках шариков! Хитрая решётка, которую мы обсуждаем, называется кубической гранецентрированной, и это самая плотная упаковка В нашей задачке кубик с обычной решёткой имеет слегка больший размер, но весит меньше. И он легко изгибается, как видно на видео. ГЦК-кубик ощущается заметно более тяжёлым, он вообще не деформируется, но крошится по краям. (И я не придумал простой способ его собирать) Поч…
custom 52016621695229376043👍2custom 52018924441945113802
Красивое решение загадки про число кубиков! Самый простой способ сосчитать шарики во втором кубике — представить себе обычный кубик 9×9×9=729, раскрашенный шахматным образом, и убрать из него все чёрные шарики. Количество чёрных и белых шариков отличается на 1 (это понятно, если разделить куб на "доминошки" из чёрных и белых шариков). Белых больше, поэтому (729+1)/2 = 365 Раньше у шарика было 6 соседей (по одному …
❤5👍3
Сегодня утром задумался, как сделать так, чтобы всем известная деревянная железная дорога всегда замыкалась без ошибки, как бы ни были соединены детальки. Получились вот такие картинки!
❤6
Сколько шариков в первом кубе? А во втором? Upd: Я только что нашёл мгновенное супер короткое решение без формул и алгебры!!
🌚2
Мой новый проект: ребята соревнуются в строительстве мостов и придумывании загадок! 🌉 Как построить мост, используя минимальное количество материала? 🛠 Сначала я сделал сам для себя маленький конструктор. Оказалось, что строить мосты интересно — и совсем непросто! А потом понял, что просто обязан поделиться им со своими учениками! Пришлось немного поработать над этим, сделать интерфейс и админку 🏆 И это отлично с…
🔥8custom 52016621695229376044
Доброе утро! Из магнитного конструктора сама собой собралась задачка. Сколько тут шариков?
🔥7
(это продолжение, начало тут) Математика — это искусство думать в заранее установленных рамках. Мы придумываем любые правила, например это могут быть правила настольной игры, или "мы соединяем палочки магнитными шариками", или правила обычного умножения, или например сумасшедшие правила умножения, где 🍋 × 🍋 = (−1) И смотрим, что получится. И всё. Большинство возможных правил рождают совершенно неинтересные вселен…
❤6💯2
Тут недавно самый обычный Claude Fable опроверг так называемую гипотезу якобиана. Это достижение намного круче, скажем, докторской диссертации, подробности в посте Аввы (сам я, увы, даже не знаю, что такое якобиан). Это настоящее, большое, творческое свершение Предвижу общественную дискуссию в ключе "куда катится мир и что ж теперь делать, математики больше не нужны" Математика никуда не денется, друзья! Вот что н…
Я придумал супер формулу: чтобы ребята развивались, им нужны одновременно все эти штуки: 🚀 Активная позиция: инициатива приветствуется, курс не задан раз и навсегда, а ребята — соавторы, а не исполнители. Ребята ценят то и только то, что делает их сильнее и свободнее 🧑🏫 Учитель: я отвечаю за общий порядок и нормальную атмосферу на занятиях. Учитель должен чувствовать, что сейчас зайдёт ребятам и как поддержать их …
👍7❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @philipacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У этой задачки есть супер наглядное решение! А вы его видите?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,316,788 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кружок Филиппа — приключения и математика!” (@philipacademy), 760 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/philipacademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.