Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kurnikov® | Девелопмент по-другому

@iamkurnikovdev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,444subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744115249
TypeChannel
Username@iamkurnikovdev
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iamkurnikovdev

Growth

3,4443,4513,447.57 August 2026 — 3,451 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,450 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,446 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,444 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,443–3,452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:033,444-2
10 Aug 2026, 17:373,446-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:063,450-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:453,451first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 3,444 subscribers
Avg views / post
427
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held13 (12 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,282
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

159 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4327.0%
4025.2%
🔥3924.5%
😁2817.6%
👏31.89%
🤣31.89%
10.629%
💯10.629%
😱10.629%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC314 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @atsogoevFile

🏦 Пару месяцев назад на рынке появился фонд «ФРИДН», финансирующий девелоперов, которым не хватает собственного капитала для получения проектного финансирования в банке. Банк требует от застройщика наличия 15-20% от бюджета проекта собственного капитала, у застройщика этих денег нет - недостающую часть вносит фонд. Я, наконец, добрался до презентации фонда и вот мои выводы! 📄 Конструкция - договор конвертируемого за

👍6

28 Jul 2026, 11:49 UTC503 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Есть потенциал в пре-фандинге новых застройщиков (дисконт от цен на котловане в 70%)?

  1. Да, точно есть!57%
  2. Нет, много рисков41%
  3. Свой ответ в комментариях1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC465 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вопрос знатокам! Смотрите, Некоторые резиденты акселератора (то есть новые застройщики) не могут найти инвестора. Есть девелоперский проект, скажем клубный дом в центре Москвы или башня за Третьим Транспортным Кольцом. Стадия ГЗК 1. Год на проектирование, 2,5 – на стройку. Итогу 3,5 года. Нужно собственное участие в 300-500 млн. Инвестиции структурируются по пре-фандингу (когда квартиры предпродаются с большим ди

3👍3🔥2

9 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC542 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @firstDevelopmentMoscowPhoto

10 июля пройдет Бизнес-бранч акселератора № 2: «Какие дома вы можете запустить в девелопмент сейчас» Друзья, уже в пятницу бизнес-бранч! Место: Smart Yard (в районе Бауменки). Переговорная № 4. Яндекс-карта: https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CPdlmFYj Время: 13.00 (не опаздывайте) Расскажем про площадки в девелопмент, которые можно запустить прямо сейчас: – с адресами. – детальными расходами (по банковскому бюджету). –

👍6🔥51

7 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC530 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @collection_propertyPhoto

Девелопмент — это не про квадратные метры. Это про любовь к созданию. Гостем летнего номера «Коллекции Новостроек» стал Александр Курников — кризисный девелопер, основатель Kurnikov®, акселератора девелоперов и венчурного фонда. Полное интервью читайте на сайте «Коллекции Новостроек».

5👍2🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC500 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

[ФРИДН] будет фондом без власти над девелопером Все кто привлекал инвестиции, знают – инвестор хочет контролировать процесс. Согласовывать всё! Выбирать архитектуру, дизайнеров, плитку… Я наелся этим так! Даже тааааак! Что, когда мы с Kama Flow обсуждали структуру и принцип работы фонда, решили – девелопер должен быть девелопером. Мы финансируем – получаем метры (по пре-фандингу). Всё! Да, мы обвязываем сделку, защ

🔥13👍82

30 Jun 2026, 10:47 UTC608 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fridnvcPhoto

Как связаться с фондом Для связи используйте кнопку «Сообщение» (находится внизу слева), или напрямую управляющему партнеру фонда Егору Лапутину (@egorla). По каким вопросам стоит писать: 1. Вы хотите получить инвестиции. 2. Вы инвестор. 3. Вы тоже фонд и хотите партнерства с [ФРИДН]. 4. У вас есть участок под девелопмент (жилье) и вы хотите продать. 5. По другим предложения. Венчурный фонд [ФРИДН] @fridnvc

3👍21🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 09:14 UTC674 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что если (когда-нибудь) исчезнут все дороги Мы с сыночком очень любим смотреть на поезда… Сидим на террасе и когда вдалеке проезжает состав, он тычет в него маленьким пальчиком: «Уу, ууу» (моему герою совсем недавно исполнился год). Я говорю: «Саня, вот ты вырастишь, и, наверняка, поезда будут уже не ездить по земле, а летать по небу…». Он понимающе смотрит мне в глаза: «Уууу»! А ведь если задуматься… Только дорог

11🔥4👍2

23 Jun 2026, 11:09 UTC658 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fridnvcPhoto

Как подать заявку на инвестиции в девелоперский проект 1. Заполните короткую анкету по ссылке: https://fridn.ru 2. Назначим встречу с командой фонда в течение 3-х дней либо дадим развернутую обратную связь (если проект не прошел отбор). Венчурный фонд [ФРИДН] @fridnvc

3👍2🔥2

17 Jun 2026, 10:56 UTC863 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Идея для нового бизнеса! 1. Находите интересный участок под девелопмент. 2. Подписываете с продавцом соглашение о намерениях. 3. Даете небольшой задаток – 5 млн. Обязательно условие о возврате двойного задатка, в случае расторжения со стороны продавца (хотя это и так есть в силу закона) 4. Ждете… когда кто-то перебьет сделку!! 5. Продавец возвращает 10 млн. 6. Профит – 5 млн. Итого 100% ROI за квартал. 3-4 т

😁22🔥62👍2👏1😱1

16 Jun 2026, 17:03 UTC772 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Стас, я доработал ваш слайд! Смотри как стоит поправить: «Кризис обнажил слабые места проектов, где ЗДРАВЫЙ смысл существовал формально» Не благодари) Курников (@iamkurnikovdev)

😁63🤣3🔥2💯1

16 Jun 2026, 16:27 UTC729 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Давно я ни с кем не спорил)… Фраза из презентации SmartHearts (извини, Стас, никак не привыкну к вашим «Умным сердцам»): «Кризис обнажил слабые места проектов, где смысл существовал формально». Стас, ну что это значит?) Как брендинг может найти СМЫСЛ в том что строится? Ну, правда) Брендинг может создать внимание, образ чтобы дом полюбился. Но сам СМЫСЛ любого девелопмента для покупателей – жить в доме. Для биз

👍94👏2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @iamkurnikovdev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 11:49 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

Есть потенциал в пре-фандинге новых застройщиков (дисконт от цен на котловане в 70%)?

  1. Да, точно есть!57%
  2. Нет, много рисков41%
  3. Свой ответ в комментариях1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 287,762 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kurnikov® | Девелопмент по-другому” (@iamkurnikovdev), 3,444 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iamkurnikovdev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.