Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Повітряна тривога 🚀

Channel

Повітряна тривога 🚀

@air_alert_telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

100,578subscribers

-2,929 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001328971794
TypeChannel
Username@air_alert_telegram
DescriptionМоніторинг активності окупантів на території України! Посилання на канал — https://t.me/+poxjMXwms5RlM2Ri Реклама: @p_super Надіслати новину — @air_alert_novyna_bot
Created14 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/air_alert_telegram

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@shv_ukr/2242215 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC@air_alert_telegram/93911 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC1.002.9 hours
@shv_ukr/2302527 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC@air_alert_telegram/94232 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC1.0072 seconds
@shv_ukr/2322831 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC@air_alert_telegram/94316 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC1.0066 minutes
@shv_ukr/232841 Sept 2026, 17:45 UTC@air_alert_telegram/94349 · this entry1 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC1.005 minutes
@shv_ukr/2570020 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC@air_alert_telegram/95457 · this entry20 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC1.00under a minute
@shv_ukr/2406016 Sept 2026, 18:45 UTC@air_alert_telegram/94725 · this entry16 Sept 2026, 18:53 UTC0.888 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@shv_ukr7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.965 minutes@shv_ukr (7–0)
@tgsn_ua7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.937 minutes@tgsn_ua (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 12 of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 952 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

100,578103,507102,042.56 August 202615 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 101 days, net -2,929. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100,139–103,946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Nov 2026, 02:29100,578-144
12 Nov 2026, 01:38100,722-82
10 Nov 2026, 03:09100,804-47
8 Nov 2026, 15:48100,851-41
7 Nov 2026, 12:31100,892-52
6 Nov 2026, 13:08100,944-24
5 Nov 2026, 12:56100,968-43
4 Nov 2026, 11:54101,011-48
3 Nov 2026, 12:38101,059-60
2 Nov 2026, 10:49101,119-372
1 Nov 2026, 08:45101,491-45
31 Oct 2026, 06:54101,536-46
30 Oct 2026, 09:15101,582-46
29 Oct 2026, 07:46101,628-39
28 Oct 2026, 07:06101,667-50
27 Oct 2026, 07:41101,717-39
26 Oct 2026, 10:15101,756-32
25 Oct 2026, 10:18101,788-60
24 Oct 2026, 07:00101,848-43
23 Oct 2026, 05:18101,891first reading

Engagement

1,744 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 205 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 100,578 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,000
447 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
447
of 1,744 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held1,744 (5 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total8,056,560
Reactions total98,643
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 17:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈24,800
Videos
≈11,500
Links
≈51,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 34m
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 217 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

227,839 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬84,65837.2%
🙏41,16618.1%
😢21,3129.35%
❤13,7546.04%
🔥12,8675.65%
🤡10,5944.65%
😭10,5814.64%
👍9,0583.98%
🖕4,1681.83%
🤮3,0121.32%
😱2,4741.09%
💩2,3531.03%
🤔1,9600.86%
😁1,5640.686%
🤯1,4750.647%
🤣1,3160.578%
💯1,2150.533%
👎7770.341%
💔6000.263%
👏5950.261%
36 further kinds2,3401.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227,839 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 September 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @air_alert_telegram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 September 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.1%
1 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
16,700
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
18,300
over 999 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 September 2026 to 15 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 139 of 447 posts held from the last 30 days (31.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 15:35 UTC≈7,420 views282 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

🔥Літак МіГ-29 перехоплює і збиває реактивний безпілотник «Герань-4»під час атаки по українських містах, - 204-а бригада тактичної авіації Повітряна тривога 🚀 | Підписатися

🙏183❤55🔥28👍16

15 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC≈9,190 views64 reactionsread 15 November 2026

🟡 Загроза БпЛА: тривога в Києві та низці областей

🙏48🤬16

15 Nov 2026, 13:54 UTC≈10,900 views158 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

❗️В Одесі зафіксували влучання по автосалону Mercedes-Benz. На території спалахнула масштабна пожежа, — місцеві ЗМІ Повітряна тривога 🚀 | Підписатися

🤬121😢31❤4😡2

15 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC≈11,000 views133 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

😤русня вдарила по інфраструктурі Одеси — палають автомобілі Повітряна тривога 🚀 | Підписатися

🤬101🙏17😢14👌1

15 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC≈11,400 views92 reactionsread 15 November 2026

🗣Якщо ми дійдемо до стану, коли ворог зруйнує всі мости в Києві, то поромні та понтонні переправи теж будуть зруйновані, це все медійна метушня, — радник президента «Флеш» Повітряна тривога 🚀 | Підписатися

👍45😱23❤5🙏5💯4🤨4🤬3😁3

15 Nov 2026, 12:15 UTC≈12,200 views147 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

🤬Лише за цей тиждень рф випустила по Україні понад 2300 дронів і 1590 авіабомб, — Зеленський «Також було застосовано 15 ракет. Під ударами опинилися енергетика та залізнична інфраструктура в низці областей. Відомо про 16 постраждалих», — додав він. Повітряна тривога 🚀 | Підписатися

🤬121😢16❤7🤡3

15 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC≈12,500 views212 reactionsread 15 November 2026

❗️Російські «шахеди» влучають по українських підстанціях через обмеження роботи Starshield, - Зеленський Наші дрони-перехоплювачі втрачають зв’язок з операторами на швидкості 161 кілометр на годину (100 миль на годину) і просто не доганяють російські реактивні «шахеди». Розраховуємо, що ці обмеження будуть зняті, - зазначив президент. Повітряна тривога 🚀 | Підписатися

🤬157🙏35🤡11💯4❤3😢2

15 Nov 2026, 10:06 UTC≈13,300 views89 reactionsread 15 November 2026

🔴 Загроза балістики: тривога в Києві та низці областей

🙏56🤬31❤2

15 Nov 2026, 08:27 UTC≈14,900 views276 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🤬У Кропивницькому ворожий дрон влучив у житловий будинок, — ОВА Повітряна тривога 🚀 | Підписатися

🤬192🙏38😢32😱8❤6

15 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTC≈15,600 views122 reactionsread 15 November 2026

🔴 Загроза балістики: тривога в Києві та низці областей

🙏76🤬39❤4🖕2👎1

15 Nov 2026, 06:53 UTC≈16,300 views263 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔥У Татарстані після атаки БпЛА горить один із найбільших нафтохімічних заводів рф — «Нижньокамськнафтохім» За 2025 рік підприємство виробило 3 млн тонн нафтохімічної продукції. Потужність нового комплексу ЕП-600 становить до 600 тисяч тонн етилену на рік. Повітряна тривога 🚀 | Підписатися

🔥188👍53🥰16❤6

14 Nov 2026, 20:03 UTC≈21,100 views354 reactionsread 15 November 2026

‼️Близько 40 балістичних і гіперзвукових ракет, а також 8 «Калібрів» росія готова застосувати по території України. Серед ймовірних цілей — Київ та Київщина, Полтава, Харків, Дніпро та Запоріжжя • Близько 20 балістичних ракет Іскандер-М/С-400 у Брянській області. • 10 балістичних/протикорабельних ракет Іскандер-М/Циркон/Онікс-М у Курській області. • 8 балістичних ракет Іскандер-М у Воронезькій області. • Щонайменше …

🤬219🙏104❤20👎8🍌1👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,744 posts we hold for @air_alert_telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@air_alert_telegram edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 October 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна
@tgsn_ua · 1,108,673
#1
Николаевский Ванёк
@vanek_nikolaev · 2,575,491
#2
🟢 Київ Новини | Live 24/7
@kyiv_novyny_24 · 236,842
#3
Лачен пише
@lachentyt · 1,578,193
#4
Реальний Київ | Украина
@kievreal1 · 1,552,209
#5
Київ ІНФО | Новини Україна 🇺🇦
@kievinfo_kyiv · 1,261,551
#6
Труха⚡️Україна
@truexanewsua · 3,165,061
#7
INSIDER UA | Україна | Новини
@insiderukr · 2,141,667
#8
Реальна Війна | Україна | Новини
@voynareal · 1,543,423
#9
Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
@kpszsu · 938,428
#10
Всевидящее ОКО (миллион подписчиков)
@oko_ua · 1,751
#11
monitor
@war_monitor · 958,023
#12
Киевский Движ
@k_dvizh · 470,624
#13
Труха⚡️Київ
@truexakyiv · 972,266
#14
Україна Online: Новини | Політика
@UaOnlii · 1,536,697
#15
УС: Україна, новини, політика, війна
@u_now · 1,403,118
#16
ТСН новини / ТСН.ua
@tch_channel · 729,418
#17
Левый Берег Киев
@kiev_levyy_bereg · 493,259
#18
Батальйон Монако
@batalionmonako · 712
#19
✙ Київ Оперативний | Kyiv Operative ✙
@kyivoperat · 338,101
#20
Бавовна
@ukrbavovna · 801,855
#21
Чому тривога | Радар
@raketa_trevoga · 472,563
#22
Оперативний ЗСУ
@operativnoZSU · 359,722
#23
🔊⚠️єРадар | Повітряна тривога | Ракетна небезпека
@eRadarrua · 410,667
#24
КМДА – офіційний канал
@KyivCityOfficial · 403,692
#25
Ukraine NOW
@UkraineNow · 404,377
#26
✙DeepState✙🇺🇦
@deepstateua · 750,849
#27
Карта повітряних тривог 🇺🇦
@alarmua · 941,284
#28
✙ 🔼Вертикаль
@vert2026 · 113,508
#29
Київський купол | Графіки
@nebo_raketa · 543,748
#30
Куди летить? | Тривога
@radar_raketaa · 491,787
#31
Говорять Снайпер ꑭ
@stanislav_osman · 287,836
#32
Де Ракета ?🚀 | Моніторинг
@deraketaua · 154,826
#33
Всевидящее ОКО 18 ✙
@oko18_ukr · 315,929
#34
Тривога України | Радар
@kiev_nebo · 539,280
#35
ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS
@Tsaplienko · 319,843
#36
Україна⚡️Новини⚡️
@uanova · 565,035
#37
Карта повітряних тривог ‼️ Вибухи ‼️ Ракети ‼️
@povitryanatrivogaaa · 729,360
#38
Правий Берег Київ | Киев
@kiev_pravyy_bereg · 181,285
#39
Андрій Смолій
@smolii_ukraine · 523,797
#40
Zelenskiy / Official
@v_zelenskiy_official · 665,469
#41
СУСПІЛЬНЕ НОВИНИ
@suspilnenews · 262,481
#42
Тотальна Зрада
@totallzrada · 266,456
#43
🔊Чому тривога?🚨| Повітряна тривога | Ракетна небезпека | єРадар |
@tryvoga_chomu · 271,891
#44
NEXTA Live
@nexta_live · 765,456
#45
ХК 🇺🇦 Київ
@h_kiev · 126,491
#46
Львівич | Новини
@lvivych_news · 458,286
#47
ДТЕК - офіційний канал
@dtek_ua · 447,558
#48
Хмельницький LIVE
@khmlv · 299,180
#49
Скринька Пандори
@pandoras_box_ua · 157,815
#50
УНИАН - новости Украины | война с Россией | новини України | війна з Росією | УНІАН
@uniannet · 700,473
#51
Ху Київ + | Україна
@kyiv_xy · 249,297
#52
Повітряна Тривога
@air_alert_ua · 226,015
#53
Віталій Кличко
@vitaliy_klitschko · 194,843
#54
Ху Київ | Україна
@XYKYIV · 168,649
#55
ГОНЧАРЕНКО
@oleksiihoncharenko · 209,225
#56
ОПЕРАТИВНИЙ ІНФОРМ
@operinform · 135,692
#57
КС: новини Київ
@kyiv_n · 276
#58
Хуйовий Харків 🇺🇦 Хуевый Харьков
@huyovy_kharkiv · 463,751
#59
Захід Головне
@zahid_golovne_ua · 602,810
#60
Харьков life | Харків 🇺🇦
@kharkivlife · 666,407
#61
Дніпро Alerts 🚀 🚨
@dnipro_alerts · 810,349
#62
ХДніпро 🇺🇦
@hyevuy_dnepr · 520,441
#63
Андрій Єрмак 🇺🇦
@ermaka2022 · 79,872
#64
ППО радар | Напрямок ракет | Напрямок шахедів |
@mon1tor_ua · 263,748
#65
БЕЗПЕЧНИЙ РЕГІОН
@bezpechniyregion · 163,283
#66
ЧОРНИЙ ЛИСТ
@blacknews_ukr · 190,724
#67
Збройні Сили України. Війна з окупантами
@zsuwar · 108,947
#68
monitoring
@monitorwarr · 85,177
#69
Львів 24/7 🟢
@lviv_24x7 · 64,453
#70
Харківський Саньок
@Sanek_Kharkiv · 144,669
#71
🚀 РАКЕТА UA | Тривога України
@war_raketaua · 85,686
#72
Вмикач Київ | Світло💡
@kiev_svet · 236,287
#73
Одесса INFO ⚓️ 🇺🇦 Новости | Одеса
@odessa_infonews · 990,973
#74
єСвітло💡Київ | Світло
@esvitlo_kyiv_ua · 167,857
#75
Хуевая Одесса
@xydessa · 944,347
#76
Инсайдер Киев
@KyivPolitic · 132,044
#77
Канал Ростіка
@crypto_rostik · 116,963
#78
Київ News | Світло
@svitlo_kiyv · 150,647
#79
Повістки Київ / Повестки Киев / Погода Киев
@kyiv_povistka · 231,115
#80
ОГо!
@OGoMono · 635,159
#81
Бахмутський Демон 👹
@bahshiddemon · 169,645
#82
XYDESSA LIVE
@xydessa_live · 583,900
#83
Bitcoin UA — биткоин, инвестиции, деньги
@bitcoin_ua_telegram · 31,526
#84
Pravda Gerashchenko
@Pravda_Gerashchenko · 300,533
#85
Укренерго
@Ukrenergo · 100,021
#86
Повістки Київ / Повестки Киев
@kyiv_povestka · 226,454
#87

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Львів 24/7 🟢
@lviv_24x7 · 64,453
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
Телеграмна служба новин - Україна
@tgsn_ua · 1,108,673
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
🟢 Київ Новини | Live 24/7
@kyiv_novyny_24 · 236,842
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Штурмовики•UA
@ShturmovikiUA · 28,651
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
Виплати ЗСУ ТРО ССО НГУ СБС
@vyplaty_zsu · 43,124
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Повітряна тривога 🚀” (@air_alert_telegram), 100,578 subscribers as measured 15 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/air_alert_telegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.