Channel
@Yndegen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,547subscribers
+149 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002405573737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Yndegen |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Yndegen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 10,547 | +36 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 10,511 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 10,507 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 10,505 | +16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 10,489 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:40 | 10,487 | +16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 10,471 | +33 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 10,438 | +40 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 10,398 | first reading |
55 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 51 of 54 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (3 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 231,027 |
| Reactions total | 1,731 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,348 reactions across 39 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5424885441100782420 | 1,348 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,731reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
대충... 1년 전 같은데 기록을 쌓고 노력하고 간절하다 보면 결과가 따라올 확률이 높다고 생각해요. 물론 운이 많이 따라와줘야겠죠. 그래도 본인 판단하에 밈이 아닌 어떤 섹터를 파시더라도 그 섹터에서의 경험과 기록이 계속 쌓이다 보면 남들이 보지 못하는 기회를 조금은 더 빨리 볼 수 있게 되는 것 같습니다. 당장 결과가 나오지 않더라도 그동안 쌓아온 시간까지 없어지는 건 아니니까요. 저도 불과 1년 전에는 많이 간절했던 것 같은데 예전 기록들을 다시 보니 그때의 시간들이 지금의 저를 만드는 데 어느 정도는 도움이 된 것 같습니다. 결국 기회가 왔을 때 잡을 수 있는 사람은 그전부터 계속 그 자리에 있던 사람일 확률이높지않을까싶네요
custom 542488544110078242030
Signed n y
아................ 예전 기록들을 보다보니 당시에 내가 얼마나 간절했고 원했는지가 적나라하게 보여서 조금 부끄럽기도 하네요. 불과 1년 전인데 지금이랑 비교해보면 참 많은 게 달라진 것 같습니다. 사람이 막상 가지게 되면 그 소중함을 금방 잊어버리는 것 같은데, 가끔은 예전의 나를 돌아보면서 지금 내가 가지고 있는 것들에 감사하고 소중히 여기며 살아야겠습니다.
custom 542488544110078242053
Signed n y
👀
custom 542488544110078242027
Signed n y
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 542488544110078242018
Signed n y
생각해보면 좀 흥미로운 부분이 있음. bStocks 팔로잉을 보다보면 X Premium이 들어가있음. 물론 단순 팔로우일수도있지만 나는 이게 조금 흥미롭게 보이는게 X는 이미 X Money를 통해 금융서비스쪽으로 확장하고있고 결국 X라는 플랫폼 자체를 결제나 금융까지 가능한 하나의 생태계로 만들려고하고있음. 여기에 추후 주식이나 토큰화자산까지 연결되는 그림이 나온다면 bStocks랑도 상당히 잘맞는 구조가됨. (그리고 cz가 x에투자한사실도 알아둬야함) 그리고 BNB쪽에서 최근 지속적으로 bStocks에 대한 기대감을 넣어두고있는것도 개인적으로는 계속 신경쓰이는 부분임. 아직 이걸 가지고 협업이라고 단정할수는없지만 만약 나중에 X의 금융서비스와 bStocks가 실제로 연결되는 그림이 나온다면 “bStocks Never Sleep” 이라…
custom 542488544110078242061
Signed n y
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 542488544110078242015
Signed n y
지속적으로 기대감은 계속 넣어두고있는것같고 추후 주요인물들도 관련섹터에대해 분명히 언급을할거라고봄. 그때 어떤 내러티브를 밀어줄지, 관련 트윗계정은 어떤걸 운영할지 지켜보면좋을것같음. BNS가 아니더라도 bStocks 관련계정들은 트래킹해둬야할듯함.
custom 542488544110078242036
Signed n y
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 542488544110078242034
Signed n y
아직 런칭전 pools.fun 시총랭킹 볼수있으니 참조하시면될것같습니다.
custom 542488544110078242022
Signed n y
poolsauctionradar.com
Signed n y
not bad
custom 542488544110078242019
Signed n y
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 542488544110078242031
Signed n y
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @Yndegen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 24,998 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MEME” (@Yndegen), 10,547 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yndegen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.