Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Russian Field | Социология

Channel

Russian Field | Социология

@russian_field_soc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

13,270subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001310074115
TypeChannel
Username@russian_field_soc
Created15 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/russian_field_soc

Growth

13,24113,28713,2645 August 2026 — 13,241 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,241 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,250 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,265 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,266 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,270 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,276 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,281 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,287 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,273 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,270 subscribers13,2705 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,234–13,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:2713,270-3
13 Aug 2026, 02:1413,273-14
12 Aug 2026, 04:0513,287+6
11 Aug 2026, 07:2613,281+5
10 Aug 2026, 09:0113,276+6
9 Aug 2026, 12:0113,270+4
8 Aug 2026, 15:1413,266+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:3413,265+15
6 Aug 2026, 16:4013,250+9
6 Aug 2026, 02:3113,241no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:1513,241first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.9%
avg views ÷ 13,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,440
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held12 (30 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total41,220
Reactions total1,187
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,187 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊28223.8%
🔥25221.2%
23820.1%
🙈15713.2%
👍13511.4%
😁715.98%
👎231.94%
😢171.43%
🗿121.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @russian_field_soc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈2,480 views192 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Интервидение 2026: кто должен стать голосом России? ⭐️ После прошлогоднего перезапуска шоу «Интервидение» возвращается в 2026 году! Но кто представит Россию на вокальной арене еще не известно. Пока интрига жива, мы поинтересовались у россиян, кто достоин представить страну на грядущем конкурсе. 🤷 «Не знаю» оказалось самым популярным ответом: 40% затруднились назвать конкретного исполнителя. Среди остальных кандида

🙈77🔥53😁25👍17👎108😢2

13 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈1,870 views63 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🐅 Что изменилось за 10 лет благоустройства Татарстана? Два года социологи, урбанисты, культурологи, экологи и экономисты изучали результаты десятилетней Программы развития общественных пространств Татарстана. В прошлом году мы рассказывали о нашей части этой большой работы — комбинированном опросе 1100 жителей республики. Вот что мы тогда узнали: 🧿 Почти половина опрошенных регулярно бывает в общественных простран

👍3119🔥11🕊2

12 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,700 views46 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Как общество влияет на жизнь человека с диабетом? Russian Field x Сайнокэ Трейд Контролировать диабет приходится каждый день. Но на то, как будут чувствовать себя люди с сахарным диабетом и насколько комфортно им будет заботиться о своем здоровье, в том числе влияем мы все. Непонимание и стигма могут вынуждать людей скрывать лечение. Особенно это заметно у детей, для которых реакция сверстников и готовность взрослы

25🕊13🔥5👍3

12 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,620 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Терапия и повседневная жизнь с сахарным диабетом Russian Field x Сайнокэ Трейд Для регулярного контроля уровня глюкозы нужны расходные материалы — тест-полоски, датчики, иглы и другие устройства. Но получить их вовремя удается не всем. 77% респондентов с диабетом сталкивались со сложностями при получении расходных материалов. У 25% это происходит часто. Сложнее всего вовремя получить: 🎆 тест-полоски (65%) 🎆 датчи

20👍6🔥4😢4

12 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,820 views65 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Жизнь с сахарным диабетом: исследование практик контроля уровня глюкозы Мы провели комплексное исследование по заказу компании Сайнокэ Трейд, одного из производителей систем мониторинга уровня глюкозы, чтобы разобраться, как люди с диабетом контролируют уровень глюкозы, с какими сложностями сталкиваются и что влияет на выбор средств мониторинга. В серии постов расскажем о результатах количественной и качественной ч

34🕊19🔥9😢2🗿1

11 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈2,130 views136 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 Российская мечта в цитатах: мирное небо над головой и покошенная трава под ногами Хотя у российской мечты есть общие черты, каждый представляет её по-своему. В карточках мы собрали выборочные цитаты из открытых ответов россиян о том, какая она — российская мечта. Подробнее 🏙 Russian Field | Всероссийский телефонный опрос 18-26 июня 2026, 1600 респондентов

🕊9727👍11🗿1

10 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈2,660 views163 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺Российская мечта — она какая? Если в США существует понятие «американской мечты», то в России, должно быть, есть мечта российская. Мы решили узнать, о чем мечтают россияне. 🗾Мир и безопасность — 21% 🗾Достаток и доступные цены — 21% 🗾Личное счастье — 20% 🗾Семья и близкие — 13% 🗾Права, свободы и справедливое управление — 12% 🗾Стабильность и собственное жильё — по 10% 🗾Социальная справедливость — 8% 🗾Сильная и сувер

🕊10335👍12🗿7👎6

10 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈2,350 views61 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Завтра, 11 августа в 14:00, в пресс-центре МИЦ «Известия» состоится пресс-конференция о доступности систем непрерывного мониторинга глюкозы (НМГ) для людей с диабетом. Наш коллега Святослав Костенко представит результаты большого исследования о том, с какими сложностями сталкиваются люди с диабетом и чем они руководствуются при выборе средств мониторинга уровня сахара в крови. На пресс-конференции также обсудят дос

👍3118🔥11🕊1

5 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC≈15,200 views277 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Рейтинги политических партий: уличный опрос в Москве (июль) Общий рейтинг // чистый рейтинг (топ партий): 🚶‍♀️ Единая Россия — 29,7% // 42,5% 🧎‍♂️‍➡️ КПРФ — 10,7% // 15,8% 🚶‍♀️ Новые люди — 10,2% // 13,7% 💅 ЛДПР — 8,8% // 9,7% 🕴 Справедливая Россия — 4,1% // 5,6% 🕙 Яблоко — 4,0% // 5,27% Не поддерживают ни одну из партий или не планируют участвовать в выборах 12,2% москвичей. Среди избирателей, планирующих голосо

🔥115🙈74🕊38👍1812👎7😁6😢4

1 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈3,960 views61 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Выборы, пенсия, шашлыки и идеальный размер: главные цифры июля в ежемесячном дайджесте Russian Field 🧿68% россиян сокращали расходы за последний год — прежде всего на одежду, путешествия и продукты. 🧿80% москвичей довольны положением дел в городе, 61% планируют участвовать в выборах в Госдуму. О дате голосования знают только 38%. 🧿По данным уличного опроса, проведённого в Москве с 6 мая по 13 июня, в общем рейтинг

😁3311🔥7🙈6👍3🕊1

31 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC≈2,820 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Завершаем наше исследование об ИИ в искусстве беседой о будущем художников в эпоху развития нейросетей В карточках — мнения экспертов о месте ИИ в творчестве и на рынке: способен ли алгоритм стать самостоятельным автором, с кем он уже конкурирует и в чем нейросети пока уступают художникам. Подробнее 🏙 Russian Field | Глубинное интервью с экспертами в области теории и истории искусства, 5 человек, июнь 2025

16🔥6🕊5😢3👍1

30 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC≈2,610 views58 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Эксперимент: арт-эксперты против ИИ (Russian Field X Институт наследия и современного общества РГГУ) Есть мнение, что ИИ-картину легко распознать — нейрослопы сразу бросаются в глаза. 👾 Но если мы отберем только качественные генерации, смогут ли арт-эксперты определить, где работы художников, а где — ИИ? Как специалисты искали след нейросетей, мы рассказали в посте. А полный разбор исследования читайте в нашей ста

🔥3113😁7🕊3👍2😢2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @russian_field_soc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,343 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 47 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

«Минченко консалтинг» RUS
@mcrepostru · 16,958
7 posts
Анна Федорова
@lasombrian · 9,910
4 posts
Те самые англосаксы
@omganglos · 4,934
2 posts
Политология | Вышка
@politicalhse · 1,564
2 posts
Александр Семёнов
@SemenovCons · 808
2 posts
бесполезный политолог
@useless_polit · 174
2 posts
Агентство. Новости
@agentstvonews · 102,553
1 post
Сердце Москвы | ЦАО
@CaoheartofMoscow · 158
1 post
Форсайтер
@foresighterr · 23
1 post
Голос Румянцева 🇷🇺
@golos_rumyantseva · 481
1 post
Говорят что в Уфе...
@inUfaspeak · 752
1 post
Карельский бальзам | Новости
@KB_Announcments · 44,775
1 post
Хабаровский комсомол
@komsomol27 · 393
1 post
Ли
@LiChanal · 6
1 post
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,720,229
1 post
МОЛОДЫЕ ПОЛИТОЛОГИ
@mp_youth · 1,771
1 post
На Мар(к)се
@Na_MarXe · 974
1 post
Опросы и замеры
@oizmedia · 21,644
1 post
rev01ution.red
@rev01ution_red · 4,265
1 post
Генеалогия Русской равнины
@rus_gen · 4,117
1 post
почему анимешники с лейн на аве такие загадочные личности | Уральский Эзотерический Подпол (УЭП)
@serial_experiments_eugene · 36
1 post
Травмпункт
@trauma_law · 2,793
1 post
Виталий Аверин | Трамп и правый поворот в Европе
@vitaverin · 1,635
1 post
Депутат Ягудов
@yagudov · 347
1 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

2023 Irkutsk Oblast Legislative Assembly election (en.wikipedia.org)
“…Party of Freedom and Justice}}| |-align=center |1–20 August 2023 |[https://t.me/russian_field_soc/1018 Russian Field] |'''55%'''||'''14%'''||'''12%'''||…”
read 16 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Russian Field | Социология” (@russian_field_soc), 13,270 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russian_field_soc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.