Channel
@sashainhouse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
919subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001865591215 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sashainhouse |
| Description | Александр Гречковский. CEO в контент-агентстве INHOUSE MEDIA (www.inhouse.media) Делаем SMM и очень этим гордимся. Написать мне: @grechkovsky |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sashainhouse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 919 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 919 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (25 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 887 |
| Reactions total | 77 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
164 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5458525600648037445 | 43 | 26.2% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 24.4% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 20.7% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 11.6% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5355237469744799985 | 7 | 4.27% | |
| custom 5359581378193138129 | 2 | 1.22% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.61% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.61% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Threads* абсолютно недооценен. Особенно в B2B. Вот например ветка, где руководители маркетинга и пиара разных компаний знакомятся друг с другом. Там и Додо, и Yamaguchi, и Cofix. Пишут, кто над какими проектами работает и кого ищет. Подумал, что можно сразу эту ссылку в отдел продаж отправлять 😄 *Threads принадлежит Meta, признанной экстремистской организацией и запрещённой в РФ.
👍3🔥3custom 54585256006480374452
Вы не верили, а Госуслуги и школьные чаты сделали своё дело Каждый вторник разбираем новости с коллегами из отдела рекламы. Сегодня залипли на этой: "Макс" стал первым мессенджером в стране по месячному охвату (86,2 млн против 75,7 млн у Telegram) Пока не понимаем, как к этой цифре относится, потому что есть большие сомнения по поводу качества этого охвата. Он более технический получается. Лично у меня там самая а…
😁5🔥2👍1custom 53552374697447999851
⏺ Через 15 минут рассказываю про генерацию визуального контента на площадке МосХаб.Сколково Live-трансляция: [по ссылке]
🔥5👍3custom 54585256006480374453
Лучшее управленческое решение — не мешать Пару месяцев назад жена вышла на работу, поэтому теперь детей в сад мы водим по очереди. Короче, практикую роль менеджера утренних сборов. Наблюдаю, направляю, помогаю. Кейс: сегодня сын сам взял щётку и пошёл чистить зубы сестре. Я это не придумывал и не поручал. Просто не стал мешать. Можно подумать, что чистит он хуже чем мама (по поводу себя не уверен). Но зато берётс…
custom 54585256006480374457🔥4custom 53552374697447999853👍1😁1
Все каналы можно собрать в кучу В Telegram появились Сообщества: несколько каналов, групп и ботов объединяются в одну сущность. Функция оказалась менее популярной, чем рисовать глючные таблички. Давайте разбираться. Канал бренда, каналы проектов, брокерский канал, чаты жильцов — обычно всё это живёт отдельно друг от друга. Теперь их можно объединить под одним брендовым сообществом. И первый страх у меня был очевид…
👍5🔥3custom 54585256006480374453
На мой вкус это пока лучший кейс использования новых инструментов оформления в Telegram
🔥6👍2custom 54585256006480374452
Posted without readable text
👍4custom 54585256006480374454🔥2custom 53552374697447999851custom 53595813781931381291
Пост недели. Есть такая рубрика у меня. Я ее чё-то забросил, а тут хороший повод возобновить. Очень мне нравится, как мы собрали это видео из рендеров.
🔥6👍4custom 54585256006480374454💯1
Случайно сделал конспект разговора с женой Виноват мой AI-инсайт недели — Granola. Два года я записывал встречи и собирал саммари через tl;dv. Привык, всё устраивало. А тут поставил Granola на Mac ради того же самого: конспект после созвонов. И заодно случайно застенографировал семейный разговор. Оказалось, что если ответить на телефонный звонок с компа, он его тоже законспектирует. tl;dv записывает встречу, норм …
❤7😁4👍3custom 54585256006480374453custom 53595813781931381291
Кажется, я попался на маркетинговый крючок Знаю, маркетологу мерить по себе нельзя. Но тут накрыло меня самого, так что расскажу как есть. Жить у меня есть где, поэтому семейную ипотеку я всё откладывал: хорошо бы, но потом, когда-нибудь. Классика: то, что можно отложить, всегда проигрывает тому, что горит. А потом я на общей панике сел и внимательно изучил, как поменяется ставка в моем личном кейсе. А вместе с не…
custom 54585256006480374456👍4🔥3custom 53552374697447999851
Просто не могу не репостнуть 😆 Чтобы разобраться, почему мы в агентстве такое собираем, надо прочитать мой старый пост.
😁5❤2🔥1custom 53552374697447999851
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sashainhouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 330,869 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Саша из INHOUSE” (@sashainhouse), 919 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sashainhouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.