https://t.me/aLif_saeed/s/4

Channel
راهی به رهایی..
@rahi_be_rahaei
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,425subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001098399051 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rahi_be_rahaei |
| Created | 12 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rahi_be_rahaei |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:47 | 10,425 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:46 | 10,432 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:19 | 10,435 | +3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:39 | 10,432 | +2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:38 | 10,430 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:55 | 10,431 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:44 | 10,432 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:37 | 10,428 | +4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 10,424 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 10,425 | +5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 10,420 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:08 | 10,422 | +4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 10,418 | +5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 10,413 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 10,416 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:59 | 10,415 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 10,420 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 10,422 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:48 | 10,423 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 10,425 | first reading |
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.9%
- avg views ÷ 10,425 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,760
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 105 (29 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 40,432 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5h 50m
- Average length
- 10m 00s
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (56.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
شاگردی از استادش پرسید: خواهش میکنم به من بگو از کجا باید یک انسان خوب را تشخیص دهم؟ استاد جواب داد: تو نمیتوانی از روی سخنان یک فرد تشخیص دهی که او یک انسان خوب است، حتی از ظاهر او هم نمی توان به این شناخت رسید. اما می توانی از فضایی که در حضور او به وجود میآید، او را بشناسی؛ چرا که هیچ کس قادر نیست فضایی ایجاد کند که با روحش سازگاری نداشته باشد. @rahi_be_rahaei #نوربرت_لش_لایتنر چهارصد داستان، ترجمهی میرم…
از قید خط و زلف امید نجات هست... بیچاره عاشقی که شود مبتلای چشم! #صائب_تبریزی @rahi_be_rahaei
◾️جایگاه و اهمیت زبان فارسی استاد #جواد_طباطبایی @rahi_be_rahaei
چشم تا کار کند حلقۀ دام است اینجا @rahi_be_rahaei دیوان صائب تبریزی، غزلیات
[تکنولوژیای که توان اندیشیدن را میفرساید.] مردم به دوستداشتنِ سرکوب خود و پرستیدنِ تکنولوژیهایی روی خواهند آورد که توان اندیشیدن را از آنان میگیرند. @rahi_be_rahaei #نیل_پستمن زندگی تا سرحد مرگ، ۱۹۸۵ مقدمه برگردان کوتاه فارسی کیخسرو نصر
گفت: اگر جنگ شد، چه؟ گفتم: مرا دفن ڪن میان دو بوسه... #محمد_صالح_علاء @rahi_be_rahaei
اغلب ، قدرت یک لمس ، یک لبخند یک کلمهی محبتآمیز ، یک گوشِ شنوا یک تعریف صادقانه ، یا کوچکترین توجه را دستِ کم میگیریم. در حالی که همهی اینها میتوانند به راحتی یک زندگی را از این رو به آن رو کنند... @rahi_be_rahaei لئو بوسکالیا - زندگی باعشق چه زیباست - ترجمهی : توراندخت تمدن
🔹شورشِ زبان بر خویش دکتر #قربان_ولیئی ما در زندگی هرروزه با کلمات مقصودی را میرسانیم و میگذریم اما شعر، زبان را از این کار مالوف بازمیدارد و جهانی دیگر از دل همان واژههای آشنا میگشاید. حافظ که میگوید: «شب تاریک و بیم موج و گردابی چنین هایل»، نه از دریایی خبر میدهد و نه از غریقی نشان میخواهد. بااینهمه، هولِ آن گرداب را درمییابیم، گویی از دریایی سخن میرود که هرگز ندیدهایم، اما بیم غرقشدن در آن را خوب می…
بهغم این یکدو نَفَس را گذراندن سِتَم است @rahi_be_rahaei دیوان صائب تبریزی، غزلیات
در عالمِ بیوفا کسی خرم نیست شادی و نشاط در بنیآدم نیست آنکس که درین زمانه او را غم نیست یا آدم نیست، یا از این عالم نیست دیوان #هلالی_جغتایی، رباعیات @rahi_be_rahaei
ترجمهٔ منشور کوروش عبدالمجید ارفعی پژوهشگر و متخصص زبانهای باستانی @rahi_be_rahaei
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @rahi_be_rahaei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@rahi_be_rahaei edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 20 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @rahi_be_rahaei as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 23 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 23 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@DeLAaViiZz · 1012 postsدل واژه
@delvajeh7 · 472 postsآهستگی سادگی - غلامعلی کشانی
@AhestegiSadegi · 4911 postانجمن علمی شیمی
@chemkh · 2931 postبرسرمای درون
@ertebatbakhod · 51 postکُنج مقدس
@mitra_seyfan · 391 postقلندران حقیقت
@qalandaraneh · 981 postمرتضي لاله چيني
@saghiii110 · 4051 postدر ستایش زنانگی
@setayeshezananegi · 781 postسوگخند ( سیدمحمد حسینی )
@soogkhand · 1481 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@DeLAaViiZz · 1012 postsدل واژه
@delvajeh7 · 472 postsترنم داودی سکوت(قربان ولیئی)
@taranomedavodiesokut · 7432 postsآهستگی سادگی - غلامعلی کشانی
@AhestegiSadegi · 4911 postانجمن علمی شیمی
@chemkh · 2931 postبرسرمای درون
@ertebatbakhod · 51 postکُنج مقدس
@mitra_seyfan · 391 postقلندران حقیقت
@qalandaraneh · 981 postRadio Lavender رادیو لاوندر
@RadioLavender_D · 621 postدر ستایش زنانگی
@setayeshezananegi · 781 postستیغ
@Setiq · 2,7921 postسوگخند ( سیدمحمد حسینی )
@soogkhand · 1481 postمؤسسه فرهنگیهنری سروش مولانا
@sorooshemewlana · 9,3471 postراه
@VahidAazaad · 2661 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@HavalI_behesht12 · 21,331
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
@Ashaarkotaa · 22,705
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
@sedaye_mehrabani · 28,088
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 September 2026
@senoritamusic1 · 52,112
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
@mevlana_shams · 21,728
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
@oshoi · 19,864
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 September 2026
@mostafamalekian · 65,830
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
@khodavandegareshgh · 27,544
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
@selfinquiry · 21,618
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
@peaceradio1 · 22,800
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
@makhfigah_channel · 62,600
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
@molana79 · 104,589
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“راهی به رهایی..” (@rahi_be_rahaei), 10,425 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rahi_be_rahaei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.