. . ≣ 4 کارمای مهم که بخشیده نمیشود.✦ 📎 پاکسازی کارما 📎 .

Channel
🌹روح وروان درعالم هستی 🌹
@Roohe_bartar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,975subscribers
+389 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001033478433 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Roohe_bartar |
| Description | https://t.me/joinchat/AxNqEO0vk0phMmQ0 ارتباط برای تبادل وتبلیغات @Maryaaa2022 کانال دوم کتابخانه @kotobe_bartar |
| Created | Between 1 March 2016 and 31 May 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Roohe_bartar |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 07:21 | 30,975 | -1 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 12:59 | 30,976 | +28 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:59 | 30,948 | +16 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:49 | 30,932 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:26 | 30,941 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:38 | 30,943 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:16 | 30,948 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:11 | 30,955 | +6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:44 | 30,949 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 30,948 | +18 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 30,930 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 30,934 | +15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:07 | 30,919 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:26 | 30,921 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 30,929 | +5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 30,924 | +24 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:00 | 30,900 | +12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 30,888 | +6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 30,882 | +7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:34 | 30,875 | first reading |
Engagement
223 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 175 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.08%
- avg views ÷ 30,975 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 955
- 53 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.53%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 53
- of 223 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 53 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 223 (22 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 50,596 |
| Reactions total | 669 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 23:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈13,000
- Videos
- ≈4,790
- Links
- ≈2,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 52m 14s
- Average length
- 2m 01s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,690 reactions across 135 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,195 | 59.5% | |
| 👍 | 550 | 14.9% | |
| 🔥 | 196 | 5.31% | |
| 💯 | 165 | 4.47% | |
| 🕊 | 130 | 3.52% | |
| ❤🔥 | 123 | 3.33% | |
| 👌 | 96 | 2.60% | |
| 💔 | 74 | 2.01% | |
| 👏 | 58 | 1.57% | |
| 🙏 | 36 | 0.976% | |
| ⚡ | 32 | 0.867% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 0.379% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 0.244% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.136% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.081% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.054% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.027% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.027% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 136 of the 223 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,690 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 53 posts held from the last 30 days (9.43%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
. . ≣ 21حرکت یوگا ضدپیری؛ یوگای چروک صورت و لاغری ✦ 📎 کلیک کنید 📎 .
. . ≣ کارما چیست؟ چگونه کارمای اجدادی را پاکسازی کنیم؟ ✦ 🔗 15 قانون کارما 🔗 .
یک راز عجیب در خصوص نابود شدن خرد جمعی وجود دارد: اگر تعداد چشمگیری از افراد یک توهم را مشاهده کنند آن توهم تبدیل به واقعیت میشود. اگر تعداد کافی از مردم به یک نکبت و فلاکت بخندند آن بدبختی تبدیل به یک لطیفهی بامزه خواهد شد. #سه_دختر_حوا #الیف_شافاک @Roohe_bartar
👍13❤9👎2💔2
کم کم درک کردم و آزمایشهای زندگی مرا به این فکر انداخت و یقین حاصل کردم که در واقع سرچشمهٔ تمام خوشبختیهای انسان در خودمان وجود دارد و مردم دیگر قادر نیستند که ما را بدبخت سازند. و بطور کلی کسی که بخواهد حقیقتاً خوشبخت باشد، هیچکس قادر نیست این خوشبختی را از او بگیرد. #تفکرات_تنهایی #ژان_ژاک_روسو @Roohe_bartar
❤13💯3👎1🕊1
. . ≣ کد کیهانی چیست؟ ≣ راز اعداد تکرارشونده(11:11) 🔗 کلیک کنید 🔗 .
❤1
. . ≣ پاکسازی بدن از انرژی های منفی، ترس، افسردگی و بیماری 📎 کلیک کنید 📎 .
https://t.me/joinchat/lb7iFs0qEohhYjFk گروه روح وروان درعالم هستی👆 https://t.me/joinchat/THI5AxqG_KJXUajq گروه طلوعی درغروب👆 کتابخانه صوتی @kotobe_bartar روح برتر @Roohe_bartar
. . ≣ 15 قانون کارما که زندگیتان را متحول میکند ✦ 📎 کلیک کنید 📎 .
. . ≣ 10 عادتی که باعث پیری زودرس میشود؛ یوگا رفع چین و چروک صورت ✦ 📎 یوگای رفع واریس 📎 .
آنهایی که بیدار شدهاند، بقیه انسانها را به سمت نور و حقیقت هدایت میکنند، و سلطه مستبدانه بر انسان را کاهش میدهند. این موجودیتهای تاریک شیطانی انگلوارند و برای تغذیهی خود به عواطف و احساسات انسانی نیازمند هستند. آنها میتوانند به صورت انسان و غیر انسان ظاهر شوند. بسیاری از ما در این زمان اینجا هستیم، تا بفهمیم این موجودات چگونه کار یا فکر میکنند، از کجا آمدهاند و چطور به این سیاره نفوذ کردهاند. ما در یک جنگ ب…
👍17❤13🕊5🔥3❤🔥2💯1
قدرتمندترین روش تصمیم گیری این است که از خداوند بخواهید برای شما تصمیم بگیرد. @Roohe_bartar
❤🔥19❤16👌4🔥2🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 223 posts we hold for @Roohe_bartar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Roohe_bartar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 31 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 31 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 10 posts on @Roohe_bartar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 22 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 26 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@aghtdar · 2826 postsدیدار با خویشتن
@didarbakhishtan · 8242 postsجلیل ملاجوادی
@jalilmolajavadi · 1562 postsدر محضر استاد
@life_classes · 2632 posts"انتخاب کن"
@Entekhab_kon · 501 postکانال ارشیوطلوعی درغروب 🌹
@Toloei_dar_ghorob · 8681 postحضور موثر
@beingHM · 1531 postسلامت و تعالی خانواده
@matabporahmadi · 1981 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@aghtdar · 2826 postsمسعود بلاش| رازکائنات
@razekaenat_com · 9,6793 postsسکوت ذهن
@sokoutezehn · 5,8393 postsدیدار با خویشتن
@didarbakhishtan · 8242 postsجلیل ملاجوادی
@jalilmolajavadi · 1562 postsدر محضر استاد
@life_classes · 2632 postsبهترين نتوركر
@behtarinnetworker · 31 postحضور موثر
@beingHM · 1531 post"انتخاب کن"
@Entekhab_kon · 501 postinforman
@informan · 41 postسلامت و تعالی خانواده
@matabporahmadi · 1981 post🌍Satori☀️
@moraghebevakhodshenasi · 9311 post🔑 رازهای بهتر زیستن 🔑
@raaz_zendegi · 1,7111 postشمایل یار
@shamayeleyar · 3471 postShantii_yoga
@Shantii_yoga · 3781 postکانال ارشیوطلوعی درغروب 🌹
@Toloei_dar_ghorob · 8681 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Asrar_Daroun · 35,213#1
@kotobe_bartar · 29,983#2
@MasomehAbedini · 6,424#3
@AlishLifeAcademy · 432#4
@man_m_hastam · 21,154#5
@OCEAN_OM · 47,683#6
@dunyaye_daroon · 9,553#7
@RohShokrgozari · 12,055#8
@haghayegheanunnaki · 1,063#9
@parvazane · 2,877#10
@SamadhiLibrari · 6,218#11
@AAAAAFc6k7keyheeyqlPBg · 375#12
@payamibarayesolh · 11,132#13
@sepedari · 6,221#14
@joe_diispenza · 27,097#15
@Royal_silencemind · 12,316#16
@medirtatio1 · 12,887#17
@PasAz_Marg · 14,755#18
@spiritual_1111 · 8,099#19
@nirvana144 · 1,123#20
@hosein_shafee · 12,827#21
@nazeraramesh10 · 2,484#22
@eshgh_khodshenasi · 1,306#23
@selfinquiry · 21,627#24
@Ashaarkotaa · 22,672#25
@sedaye_daron · 7,341#26
@reikiislove · 11#27
@eshghnirooyebidariii · 4,937#28
@sofiasananda · 5,219#29
@man_h_hastam · 3,896#30
@kh0daShEnaSi · 8,758#31
@salekvasel · 1,158 (as read 7 September 2026)#32
@shaidaizadi · 6,371#33
@SFREDAMHDARD4030 · 11,163#34
@shamsomah · 1,055#35
@Taalibakhshi · 6,282#36
@hasty_be_kooshesh · 5,302#37
@Yogananda_Persian · 8,580#38
@nashretorang · 1,485#39
@hooshmandy · 6,458#40
@Mavara_Joe_Dispenza · 10,986#41
@royalmind · 117,946#42
@selfformed2 · 955#43
@motaeeal · 15,936#44
@nilofaredaroon · 4,119#45
@VaraTamavara · 15,731#46
@eshraghomavara · 2,482#47
@masters_of_awareness · 11,560#48
@VasleDoost · 5,015#49
@gottesheilung · 3,688#50
@negar_hadi_dek · 5,168#51
@asrebidaari · 35,349#52
@Khodshenasivo · 42,244#53
@Thebreezeofparadise · 2,646#54
@Agahi_metafizik · 7,002#55
@taa_naa_soob · 2,557#56
@boedpanjom · 3,170#57
@sahabii_arezoo · 5,314#58
@man_x_hastam · 10,526#59
@asraarehasti · 11,624#60
@kanalshahin · 3,818#61
@book_noor · 44,634#62
@nazeraramesh9 · 23,723#63
@Tanine_farzanegi · 30,730#64
@sadguru_persian · 778#65
@hamisherahii · 63,715#66
@razemovafaghiaterfan · 18,747#67
@shams_sabzevari · 5,840#68
@erfanvametafizik · 33,448#69
@ArchAngelMeditation · 72,111#70
@nazeraramesh15 · 3,687#71
@nazeraramesh14 · 8,552#72
@vahidomidvari_com · 4,212#73
@Reiki_knowledge · 7,330#74
@Planet7 · 2,377#75
@ufo98 · 1,139#76
@Hermetica7 · 3,741#77
@Anti_System_Archive · 792 (as read 7 September 2026)#78
@Qeutzalcoatl · 2,029#79
@froghani2 · 1,651#80
@pranayoga · 1,182#81
@heavenongaia55 · 2,265 (as read 7 September 2026)#82
@GhaffeEshgh · 23,888#83
@farzandanenoorekhoda · 2,951#84
@jaoozb · 4,210#85
@farazaminihanws · 2,581#86
@Niassargadatta · 5,418#87
@nazerarameh11 · 3,407#88
@LightFamily · 4,975#89
@montakhab_masoudriaei · 3,301#90
@Imagination_Forall · 5,763#91
@AutumnAU · 28,151#92
@AncientOccultism · 4,340#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kotobe_bartar · 29,983
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
@Asrar_Daroun · 35,213
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
@OCEAN_OM · 47,683
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
@asrebidaari · 35,349
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
@book_noor · 44,634
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
@Ashaarkotaa · 22,672
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
@erfanvametafizik · 33,448
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 September 2026
@joe_diispenza · 27,097
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
@yogasp · 49,452
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
@razemovafaghiaterfan · 18,747
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026
@Khodshenasivo · 42,244
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
@selfinquiry · 21,627
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
@man_m_hastam · 21,154
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
@academysarisaheidari · 78,726
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
@Tanine_farzanegi · 30,730
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
@arsaalanasadi7 · 45,508
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
@ArchAngelMeditation · 72,111
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
@Cheshm3kaenat · 29,538
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
@arameshe_darooon · 22,976
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
@jazbomoraghebe · 36,948
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 September 2026
@hamisherahii · 63,715
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
@spiritual_mind · 123,677
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
@AutumnAU · 28,151
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌹روح وروان درعالم هستی 🌹” (@Roohe_bartar), 30,975 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Roohe_bartar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.