Channel
@razekaenat_com
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,913subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001264014837 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @razekaenat_com |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/razekaenat_com |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 9,913 | -31 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 9,944 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 9,953 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 9,953 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (13 October 2025 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 858 |
| Reactions total | 57 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,212 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,014 | 83.7% | |
| 🕊 | 66 | 5.45% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 4.13% | |
| 👏 | 40 | 3.30% | |
| 🙏 | 24 | 1.98% | |
| ⚡ | 18 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌑 تماس با کسوف کسوف میتواند نمادی از لحظهای باشد که برای مدتی کوتاه، نور بیرونی کمرنگ میشود تا بتوانیم بیشتر به نور درونی خودمان توجه کنیم. در این نگاه معنوی، ماه نماد روح و خورشید نماد قدرت و آگاهی است. وقتی ماه برای لحظاتی خورشید را میپوشاند، انگار جهان برای لحظهای مکث میکند؛ فرصتی برای اینکه از نو به خودمان نگاه کنیم و از چرخهها و الگوهایی که دیگر به ما تعلق ندارند، رها شویم. شاید «بیداری» چیزی جز به یاد آ…
❤25🕊4
✨ بزرگترین آمادگی برای یک شروع تازه، حفظ آرامش درون است فردا، ۱۲ آگوست ۲۰۲۶، با آغاز راهروی کسوف، وارد روزهایی متفاوت و پرمعنا میشویم. گاهی برای شروع یک فصل تازه، لازم نیست کاری بزرگ انجام دهیم. گاهی کافی است کمی مکث کنیم، به درونمان برگردیم و از چیزهایی که برایمان ارزشمندند محافظت کنیم؛ آرامشمان، قلبمان، خانوادهمان، رویاهایمان و نوری که درونمان داریم. امروز مریخ وارد خرچنگ میشود و ماه در شیر قرار میگیرد؛ ترکیبی…
❤25⚡2🕊1
«روح عزیز! میدانم که اوضاع در حال تغییر است. میدانم که عشق در راه است. از اینکه با من هستی متشکرم و آن را حس میکنم! کمکم کن تا از این مرحله عبور کنم و آن را بفهمم! روح عزیز! کمکم کن تا بفهمم که یک فراآگاهی در راه است که شفقت را از نو تعریف خواهد کرد!»
❤107🕊13🔥8🙏2
امشب آسمون یه اتفاق خاص داره… چند سیاره در پدیدهای به نام همراستایی سیارات (Planetary Alignment) در یک مسیر کنار هم دیده میشن؛ اتفاقی که از چند شب قبل شروع شده و این روزها به اوج خودش رسیده. شاید بد نباشه امشب، چند دقیقهای به آسمون نگاه کنیم و از خودمون بپرسیم: اگر قراره چیزی در زندگیمون تغییر کنه، اون چی میتونه باشه؟ گاهی بعضی اتفاقها، بیشتر از اینکه بیرون از ما باشن، از درون ما شروع میشن 🌌
❤63👏7🔥1
امشب از ساعت ۰۰/۰۰ حتما حضور در لحظه حال رو حفظ کنید
❤40🔥1
ای خالق هستی اگر من، خانواده ام و نیاکانم دوستانم ،خانواده و نیاکانشان با افکار ،گفتار و رفتار و اعمال خود از روز ازل تا به امروز مرتکب کارمایی شده ایم و آگاهانه یا ناآگاهانه خواسته یا ناخواسته در روح و شعور بی نقص و بی نهایتی که به ما عطا فرمودی خاطره اشتباهی در شعور هستی ثبت کرده ایم... متأسفم لطفا مرا ببخش سپاسگزارم که بخشیدی عاشقتم ای جان جانان ای نور تابان ای خرد بی پایان بررسی اش کن و به یاری عشق الهیات به ط…
❤45🙏4🕊3
اگرچه اندوه چون استخوان شکستهای به جانمان فرو میرود، از میان شکستگی استخوانهایمان امید چون جوانهای پر شور همیشه و هنوز به سوی نور قد میکشد • معصومه صابر
❤76🕊13👏10⚡1
ولی هیچ دلیلی نداشت که از اشکهایمان شرمنده باشیم؛ چرا که اشکها شاهد این بودند که انسان بیشترین شجاعت را از خود نشان داده است؛ شجاعت رنج بردن. • ویکتور فرانکل
❤66👏3⚡2
«اگر دیدگاه کلی تان این است که رنج منفی است و باید به هر قیمتی از آن اجتناب شود ، هنگام مواجهه با شرایط سخت یک مولفه روانشناسی به خصوص که ترکیبی از اضطراب و تحمل نکردن است به شرایط سختتان اضافه میکند ، از سوی دیگر اگر قلبا بپذیرید که رنج بخشی از طبیعت زندگی است ، تردیدی نیست که در برابر دشواریهای زندگی تحمل بیشتری خواهید داشت !» • دالایی لاما
❤44👏4⚡1
♦️سوگ یک واکنش کاملا طبیعیِ مغز و روان به فقدان است. اگر جلویش گرفته شود: به تعویق میافتد و بسیار عمیقتر میشود و اغلب به شکل اضطراب غیر قابل درمان، افسردگی بسیار شدید یا مشکلات جسمی برمیگردد. ♦️حتما و باید فرد سوگوار بتواند سوگواری کند. در غیر اینصورت سوگش تبدیل به یک سوگ پیچیده و تقریبا غیر قابل شفا می شود. ♦️به هیچ وجه به سوگوار نگویید! قوی باش! الان وقت گریه و زاری نیست! دیگه بس کن! باید تحمل کنی! همه به تو نگ…
❤50🕊5⚡1
هرگز نديده بودم چشم تو را چنين درخون واشك غوطه ور اى مامِ رنجها! اى ميهنى كه درتو به خوارى مثل اسير جنگى، يك عمر زيستيم زين گونه زيستيم وبه هق هق گريستيم.🖤✨ • شفيعى كدكنى
❤45🕊8⚡1
چون قلم در دست غداری بود بی گمان منصور بر داری بود مولانا
❤38⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @razekaenat_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 321,625 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مسعود بلاش| رازکائنات” (@razekaenat_com), 9,913 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razekaenat_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.