4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,200–8,229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 06:26
8,226
+7
10 Aug 2026, 04:32
8,219
+16
7 Aug 2026, 04:00
8,203
-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:33
8,204
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.06%
avg views ÷ 8,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
663
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
54 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
35,799
Reactions total
1,617
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
59m 57s
Average length
59m 57s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,617 reactions across 54 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,190
73.6%
❤🔥
182
11.3%
👍
67
4.14%
🙏
40
2.47%
🥰
37
2.29%
👏
30
1.86%
🔥
19
1.18%
💯
10
0.618%
🤝
9
0.557%
✍
6
0.371%
😇
5
0.309%
😢
5
0.309%
👎
3
0.186%
😘
3
0.186%
🤗
3
0.186%
🤔
2
0.124%
🤩
2
0.124%
🤯
2
0.124%
🍾
1
0.062%
🐳
1
0.062%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,617reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ما را به جز خیالت، فکری دگر نباشد
در هیچ سر خیالی، زین خوبتر نباشد
کی شبروان کویت آرند ره به سویت
عکسی ز شمع رویت، تا راهبر نباشد
ما با خیال رویت، منزل در آب دیده
کردیم تا کسی را، بر ما گذر نباشد
هرگز بدین طراوت، سرو و چمن نروید
هرگز بدین حلاوت، قند و شکر نباشد
در کوی عشق باشد، جان را خطر اگر چه
جایی که عشق باشد، جان را خطر نباشد
گر با تو بر سر و زر، دارد کسی نزاعی
من ترک سر بگویم، تا دردسر نباشد
دانم که …
اذهان کوچک ما بخشی از ذهن همه توانای خداوند است. نهفته در موج هشیاری ما اقیانوس بیکران هشیاری اوست. چون موج فراموش کرده که بخشی از اقیانوس است، خود را از آن قدرت وسیع جدا مییابد. در نتیجه اذهان ما تحت تأثیر آزمونها و محدودیتهای مادی ما ضعیف شدهاند. ذهن از کار افتاده است. اگر آن را از محدودیتهایی که به آن دادهاید رها سازید، از تواناییهای آن شگفتزده خواهید شد.
پاراماهانسا یوگاناندا
شور عشق الهی
ترجمه: آرجونا …
در غرب، مردم میاندیشند که خداوند را میتوان از طریق دانش حاصل از مطالعه کتابها شناخت. ولی این نظریه یک کمبود دارد و آن اینست که هر مطالعهای باید هم جنبه نظری داشته باشد و هم جنبه عَمَلی و تجربی. از مطالعهی یک داستان میتوان به یک مفهوم نظری از آن رسید، ولی ارزش تجربی آن مفهوم در زندگی روزمره نامعلوم است. برای یک انسان اندیشمند و روشنفکر درک یک مفهوم نظری دربارهی خداوند به تنهایی کافی نیست. داستان هستی و حضور خد…
هر روز این فرصت شگفتانگیز را دارید که به زندگی خود طرحی تازه دهید. آن را با افکار مثبت و سازنده زیبا و خلاق گردانید تا هم بهبودی و سعادت معنوی خودتان را تضمین کند و هم سعادت دیگران را.
- شری دایا ماتا
چگونه بدانیم که در معنویت پیشرفت میکنیم؟
در درون شما همیشه طلبی عمیق برای خداوند است. با مراقبه کردن شما این توانایی را مییابید که ذهن خود را تحت کنترل درآورید تا تمرکز آن را بر مقصود از مراقبه معطوف کنید. در درون و در اطراف خود، در همه عالم دریایی از آرامش احساس میکنید.
در ضمن انجام فعالیتهای روزانه، یک خواست دائمی برای نیک بودن هست، برای انجام آنچه هست که حقیقت و راستی است.
در ذهن همیشه این تفکر وجود دارد که،…
در باورها و اعتقادات ما عناصر اراده و تصور نیروهایی قدرتمند در راستای نیکی و یا شر میشوند.
باور و اعتقادی که ما برمیگزینیم شخصیت ما را شکل میدهد، زیرا باور و اعتقاد انگیزهی تحرک اراده و تصور ما برای تحقق مقصودِ از آن میشود.
به همین دلیل اگر باورهای راستین خود را بر اساس خِرَد انتخاب کنیم، مهمترین انتخاب زندگی خود را کردهایم.
پاراماهانسا یوگاناندا 🕉
ما آنی میشویم که به آن فکر میکنیم..... آنچه را که در قلب خود احساس میکنیم، به خود جذب میکنیم.... و آنچه را که در تصور خود تجسم میکنیم، برای خود میآفرینیم. 🌺
چنین است قدرت افکار، احساسات و تصورات ما.👍💐
خود را از مدرسه مشکلات و دشواریها برهانید
انتظار تکامل و شادمانی باقی را از اینجا نداشته باشید؛ آن را نخواهید یافت. این دنیا همیشه پر از دشواری خواهد بود. چرا به این مدرسه انضباطی علاقه داشته باشیم؟ درسهای خود را برای همیشه بیاموزید، تا دیگر هیچگاه برخلاف اراده خود مجبور به بازگشت نشوید. خود را از این مدرسه برهانید. بر همه چیز چیره گردید. برای خداوند زندگی کنید، برای او کار کنید، برای او بیندیشید و اراده کنید. جسم…
❤20❤🔥5🥰2😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @Yogananda_Persian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Yogananda_Persian edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Hosein @hoseinmind · 283,451 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Royal mind @royalmind · 118,815 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پاراماهانسا یوگاناندا 💛” (@Yogananda_Persian), 8,226 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yogananda_Persian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.