Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🐉DragonGod👜🐯🐞🍿

Channel

🐉DragonGod👜🐯🐞🍿

@drgngod

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,043subscribers

-323 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001497161253
TypeChannel
Username@drgngod
DescriptionThe best is yet to come.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2019 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/drgngod

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0437,3667,204.57 August 2026 — 7,366 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,366 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,356 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,336 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,316 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,304 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,286 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,277 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,262 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,248 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,229 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,212 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,194 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,186 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,159 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,147 subscribers13 October 2026 — 7,116 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,103 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,093 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,082 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,075 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,064 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,055 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,054 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,043 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net -323. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,995–7,414 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 16:017,043-11
6 Nov 2026, 17:207,054-1
31 Oct 2026, 23:107,055-9
28 Oct 2026, 16:197,064-11
25 Oct 2026, 15:357,075-7
22 Oct 2026, 21:217,082-11
19 Oct 2026, 21:287,093-10
16 Oct 2026, 11:207,103-13
13 Oct 2026, 01:567,116-31
6 Oct 2026, 19:557,147-12
29 Sept 2026, 18:397,159-27
19 Sept 2026, 09:597,186-8
14 Sept 2026, 21:177,194-18
11 Sept 2026, 03:407,212-17
6 Sept 2026, 09:017,229-19
1 Sept 2026, 15:337,248-14
30 Aug 2026, 01:377,262-15
26 Aug 2026, 18:397,277-9
23 Aug 2026, 17:147,286-18
20 Aug 2026, 07:027,304first reading

Engagement

325 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.59%
avg views ÷ 7,043 subscribers
Avg views / post
605
193 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
193
of 325 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 189 of 193 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held325 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total116,734
Reactions total6,270
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 15:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈23,400
Videos
≈17,300
Links
≈36,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12h 46m
Average length
3m 31s

Measured directly from 218 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,254 reactions across 319 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4,52340.2%
❀1,84116.4%
😁7756.89%
🙏5885.22%
🥰5685.05%
👏5524.90%
🔥4223.75%
💩3753.33%
😡2552.27%
🀩2151.91%
😱2031.80%
🀣1991.77%
🫡1921.71%
😈1821.62%
🀔980.871%
👀910.809%
✍420.373%
💯400.355%
😢250.222%
🀡240.213%
8 further kinds440.391%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 321 of the 325 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,254 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 325 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 325 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drgngod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 325 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 25 of 193 posts held from the last 30 days (13.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC49 views0 reactionsread 12 November 2026

2026幎11月12日 䞖界通貚リセットで埩元された共和囜 2026幎3月21日、ドナルド・J・トランプ倧統領はアメリカ共和囜の埩掻を宣蚀し、腐敗した法人「US INC.」を解散させ、コモンロヌ䞻暩を回埩したした。これにより、米囜憲法第2条の暩限に基づく真の憲法共和囜が再確立され、倖囜の支配ず海事法が終焉したした。 2026幎11月1日、トランプ倧統領ず䞖界軍事同盟は、カバルが支配しおいたSWIFT金融システムを解䜓し、党䞖界の通貚資産を金担保の量子金融システムQFSに移行させる䞖界通貚リセットを承認したした。11月17日午埌2時20分には緊急攟送システムが起動し、旧金融システムの債務マトリックスが消滅し、新たな金融秩序が始たりたす。これに䌎い、通信遮断や倧芏暡な逮捕、技術解攟が行われ、真の自由ず豊かさの時代が到来したす。日本も囜家灜害察策庁を蚭立し、備蓄を呌びかけおいたす。 https://note.com/drgn


12 Nov 2026, 11:48 UTC348 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @dg_asc

https://youtu.be/9pfdbfYmr6g?si=9GERwsZQL4cmoYNA

❀7👍1

12 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC369 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026

【真実の舞台裏党文公開】クラゲ宇宙人 さらに倚くのアップデヌト りクラむナやむランで起きおいる地䞋爆発や地震は、米軍が関䞎する高床なEMPや電気重力孊技術を甚いた秘密䜜戊の䞀環です。これらはスタヌ・フィッシュ・プラむム䜜戊に遡るもので、地䞋に存圚する宇宙人基地や叀代文明の遺構ず深く結び぀いおいたす。アメリカ軍はこれらの技術を䜿い、クラゲのような半透明の宇宙人型生呜䜓を䜜り出し、地䞋戊争を展開しおいたす。2027幎以降、これらの珟象はさらに顕著になり、䞖界的な軍事・情報戊の栞心ずなっおいたす。 https://note.com/drgngod/n/nb7fde9f7a4f3 Join drgngod.t.me

👍12

12 Nov 2026, 11:16 UTC371 views33 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

人によっおは、圌を芋るこずができないかもしれたせんが、子どもたちは芋るこずができたす。子ども特有の無垢さには、䞖の䞭のほかの人には芋えないものを芋る力があるのです🀍✚ https://x.com/angelwhisp11/status/2120646407031783769 Join 💜dg_asc.t.me

❀30👍3

12 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC380 views18 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

#Kab #NEIOH - 「流れる觊手のある、䞀芋するず奇劙に芋える飛行物䜓は、たったく珍しいものではありたせん。 これらに぀いおは、シリりス・ノップリアからのものずしお、以前にも話し合っおきたした。 地球の皆さんが海の生き物やクラゲに䌌おいるず感じるのは理解できたす。 その䞀぀ひず぀の流れる動きは、母船に䜕千もの映像を送っおいたす。 数フィヌトの距離を移動するたびに、呚波数を監芖しおいたす。 あなたは決しお䞀人ではありたせん、倧切な友よ。 勇気を持っお、私たちの存圚を受け入れおください。私たちは光の䞭で動き、愛で地球を包んでいたす。 ゚ロヒムの皮族を敵だず描く暗い話や噂は手攟しおください。 私たちは今、人間ずしお肉䜓化しおおり、あなたの起源からの家族であり友人です。」 https://x.com/Kabamur/status/2120491979393880153 Join 💜dg_asc.t.me

❀16👍2

12 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC447 views18 reactionsread 12 November 2026

戊争が軌道䞊に拡倧NATOの衛星ずマスクの宇宙垝囜が暙的にされおいる むヌロン・マスク率いるSpaceXの衛星通信サヌビスStarshieldが、2026幎10月にりクラむナ軍の通信を突然制限し、ロシアに戊堎での優䜍を䞎えたした。米囜議䌚は制限の責任者を远及し、マスクは政府の指瀺だず䞻匵しおいたすが、誰も明確な説明をしおいたせん。これにより、SpaceXの軍事契玄や政治的立堎が揺らぎ、NATO諞囜も代替の軍事衛星ネットワヌク構築を急いでいたす。宇宙空間での軍事的緊匵ず商業衛星の二重甚途問題が深刻化しおいたす。 https://note.com/drgngod/n/ne07ae0fd43f8 Join drgngod.t.me

👍13❀5

12 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC458 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026

📅🇺🇞 11月12日朚ホワむトハりス スケゞュヌル 🇺🇞 11/12 8:00 / 🇯🇵 11/12 22:00 倧統領の執務時間堎所ホワむトハりス 🇺🇞 11/12 9:00 / 🇯🇵 11/12 23:00 ホワむトハりス垞駐報道蚘者集合時間堎所ホワむトハりス 🇺🇞 11/12 10:30 / 🇯🇵 11/13 0:30 倧統領が政策䌚議に参加堎所ホワむトハりス 🇺🇞 11/12 11:00 / 🇯🇵 11/13 1:00 倧統領が情報ブリヌフィングを受ける堎所ホワむトハりス 🇺🇞 11/12 12:30 / 🇯🇵 11/13 2:30 倧統領が事前収録のラゞオむンタビュヌに参加堎所倧統領執務宀 🇺🇞 11/12 13:30 / 🇯🇵 11/13 3:30 倧統領が事前収録むンタビュヌに参加堎所ルヌズベルトルヌム 🇺🇞 11/12 15:00 / 🇯🇵 11/13 5:0


👍16❀6

12 Nov 2026, 04:08 UTC662 views34 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Q:嵐の䞭HBO2021.3.21 Q Anonは、匿名の人物がむンタヌネット䞊で断片的な情報を公開し、数癟䞇人の支持者を惹き぀ける運動です。8chanはQ Anonを犁止せず、蚀論の自由の限界ず連邊議䌚議事堂ぞの突入事件が関連しおいたす  https://youtu.be/klsLltjAYrA?si=H1MAi1TxV90neqR5 Join drgngod.t.me

👍34

12 Nov 2026, 03:05 UTC666 views28 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

ゞョヌ・バむデン氏は、劻が圌が脳卒䞭を起こしおいるず思うほどにラむブ䞭継の蚎論䌚で頭が混乱したこずを「重芁ではなかった」ず考えおいたす。 あたりにもひどかったため、誰も圌の認知機胜の䜎䞋を擁護できず、圌は蟞退せざるを埗たせんでした。 https://t.me/BennyJohnson/19260 Join drgngod.t.me

😁27👍1

12 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC643 views28 reactionsread 12 November 2026

📅 2幎前の今日2024/11/11〜11/17🐞 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🕰 あの頃、䞖界では䜕が起きおいた 🔥 Telegramむンパクトニュヌス TOP5 ①「CIA長官候補パテル氏の情報公開方針」2024/11/12 → https://t.me/drgngod/56342 ②「むヌロン・マスク、政府効率化省DOGE共同責任者に」2024/11/13 → https://t.me/drgngod/56359 ③「囜防総省2.4兆ドル資産喪倱の謎」2024/11/17 → https://t.me/drgngod/56435 ④「米囜債務36兆ドル超過、史䞊最高蚘録」2024/11/17 → https://t.me/drgngod/56431 ⑀「むンドネシアBRICS新パヌトナヌずしお加盟」2024/11/17 → https://t.me/drgngod/5644


❀24👍4

12 Nov 2026, 01:25 UTC635 views68 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

1995幎、トランプ氏は個人的に20䞇ドルを寄付し、さらに30䞇ドルを募金しおニュヌペヌクの退圹軍人の日パレヌドを存続させたした。 ベトナム戊争の退圹軍人でパレヌドのディレクタヌは「ドナルド・トランプ氏がパレヌドを救った」ず述べおいたす。圌は愛囜者です。 https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2120559214716194977 Join 🀫dg_h2.t.me

❀50👍11👏7

11 Nov 2026, 23:33 UTC687 views53 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @dg_judynoteVideo

Q Anon、愛囜者は知っおいる。 2022幎6月8日 䞖界通貚リセットで埩元された共和囜 2018幎12月5日、ゞョヌゞ・H・W・ブッシュの葬儀でオバマ、クリントン、その他の゚リヌトに枡された謎の封筒の䞭身は䜕だったのか、「圌らはすべおを知っおいる。申し蚳ない」...ゞョヌゞ・H・W・ブッシュ 封筒には数字鍵が曞かれおいた。葬儀の埌、軍のホワむトハットぱリヌトに盎接連絡し、その番号を䜿っお、陰謀団ディヌプ・ステヌト政暩のあらゆる残虐行為の情報を保管する安党な隠しファむル・デヌタベヌスに入るよう䌝えた。 これには、バチカン、囜連、NATO、CIA、FBI、ロックフェラヌ、ロスチャむルド、アメリカ政治゚リヌトの子䟛、麻薬取匕、人身売買、銃の密売に関する蚌拠ビデオ、封印された起蚎状、911内郚告発、JFK暗殺、オバマCIA、オバマ停ビンラディン殺害、歊挢りむルスずの関連、子䟛の犠牲から䞖界の䞻芁囜で䜜られる停旗色革呜た 

👍51❀1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 325 posts we hold for @drgngod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

RVhighlights
@RVhighlights · 27,451
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 10 September 2026
American Patriot 🇺🇞🇺🇞🇺🇞
@ishjay1960 · 29,231
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 8 September 2026
GREAT AWAKENING WORLD - Truth & Secrets Revealed!
@greatawakeningworld · 21,551
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 21 September 2026
Kab
@KabamurTaygeta · 23,743
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🐉DragonGod👜🐯🐞🍿” (@drgngod), 7,043 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drgngod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.