Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BlastOff Official Announcements

@blastoffzoneANNs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,554subscribers

-85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002072903077
TypeChannel
Username@blastoffzoneANNs
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/blastoffzoneANNs

Growth

13,55413,63913,596.57 August 2026 — 13,639 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,639 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,627 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,609 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,597 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,588 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,578 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,563 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,554 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,541–13,652 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:0813,554-9
12 Aug 2026, 19:2413,563-15
11 Aug 2026, 20:3113,578-10
10 Aug 2026, 19:1813,588-9
9 Aug 2026, 22:1113,597-12
9 Aug 2026, 00:5313,609-18
8 Aug 2026, 03:0613,627-12
7 Aug 2026, 01:2713,639no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:3213,639first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

218 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4922.5%
4822.0%
💯2210.1%
👍219.63%
👏209.17%
🍌198.72%
104.59%
🤔73.21%
🐳62.75%
😱52.29%
🎉31.38%
😁31.38%
🤝20.917%
🤪10.459%
🤯10.459%
🫡10.459%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2024 to 1 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Nov 2024, 14:30 UTC≈2,320 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026

A Message to Our Community We recently announced that BlastOff would hold its first IDO this coming Monday in partnership with @GPTWars. We were thrilled to bring this exciting investment opportunity to our loyal $OFF holders. However, for an IDO to succeed, it requires strong support from our community. Unfortunately, the number of registrations has fallen short of the minimum needed for a successful launch. As a

9👍4💯21

23 Oct 2024, 12:05 UTC≈1,570 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

When we said soon, we meant it! The GPT Wars IDO registration is now open for everyone to secure their spot! Remember, the more $OFF you hold and stake, the bigger the multiplier and the bigger the allocation 🔥 How: Head to "Ongoing IDOs" at blastoff.zone and smash that register button, you'll automatically be given a tier based on your $OFF holdings (must be staked) Important dates: 1) Registration: now, slam th

4👏2🔥21🤔1

21 Oct 2024, 11:38 UTC≈1,020 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

New IDO incoming! BlastOff will be hosting GPT Wars IDO on the platform and all $OFF holders are invited to participate! What is GPT Wars? ◼️GPT Wars is the first AAA shooter survival game on TON. It's a first-person shooter survival game, set in a dystopian future and is built thanks to the efforts of 30+ people, using Unreal Engine 5.4.3. ◼️Heavily backed by industry titans such as Maven Capital, ZBS Capital, At

3👏2💯2🔥2👍1

20 Oct 2024, 09:28 UTC825 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Competition News: https://x.com/blastozone/status/1847932136286048447 The BIG announcement is coming tomorrow, be here @ 8am UTC!

👏7🔥211👍1

15 Oct 2024, 07:22 UTC896 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/blastozone/status/1846062615224553615?t=WPufeZc6_i-QGi1hNIWCWQ&s=19

💯32🔥1

3 Oct 2024, 10:48 UTC≈1,160 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

OFF: Hold To Win! Now the campaigns are over for our holders on Polygon, we're staying true to our word and rewarding holders on the chain that matters most: @blast ! From now until 10th Oct 11:59pm UTC ANY holder off $OFF on Blast will automatically be entered for a chance to win a share of 50,000 $OFF tokens ⚡️ Rules: ▫️ You must hold $OFF during the entire campaign, staring from today ▫️ Holding any amount of O

6🍌41💯1🔥1

1 Oct 2024, 06:52 UTC885 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Website upgrades OTW. Sneak peaks here 👀 https://x.com/blastozone/status/1841007967988244963

4🎉3👏2🔥1🤪1

12 Sept 2024, 13:16 UTC≈1,260 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Our first OP_NET partnership is here! BlastOff 🤝 MotoSwap MotoSwap is the first DEX built on Bitcoin; It's like Uniswap but on Bitcoin 🟧 MotoSwap will be our native DEX for IDOs we hold on OP_NET.

🔥81💯1

11 Sept 2024, 12:54 UTC≈1,060 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔊 BlastOff is officially multi-chain + 35K $OFF up for grabs! We are excited to announce we are now an official launchpad partner for OP_NET OP_NET’s unique approach and groundbreaking tech has finally brought smart contract functionality to Bitcoin, allowing developers to build dApps on the true OG blockchain. Find out more + how you could win a share of 35K $OFF! ENTER HERE

🔥42👍21

4 Sept 2024, 00:56 UTC≈1,100 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💸 Another month, another 40 winners sent 1000 $OFF each! Check your wallets, and get staking to take part in our upcoming IDOs! 📄 Winners List: https://bit.ly/BlastOffBridgeWinners This competition will run again through September. To Enter: Bridge $OFF from Polygon to Blast

🔥31

3 Sept 2024, 12:54 UTC938 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📆 BlastOff Monthly Update: Another solid month for the team. In August we announced our move to go multi-chain, improved our tier system and updated our VIP club. Oh yeah, we also shared some exciting news about future IDO plans. READ HERE

🤔4🍌1🐳1

29 Aug 2024, 12:33 UTC≈1,090 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

The SpheraWorld IDO is coming to BlastOFF! Sphera World is redefining the digital fan experience and leading the SportsFI Revolution in the MENA Region ‣ Partnered with the #1 Arabic sports news outlet ‣ Access to over 65 million monthly active users ‣ 50+ Total Partners ‣ 7+ Sports & ESports Partners ‣ The first SportsFI platform built with DePIN Get ready to change the game! Show some love on this X post and le

💯10🔥51🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blastoffzoneANNs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,008,769 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Aethir Announcements
@Aethir_Official · 138,031
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Galxe
@galxe · 170,068
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BlastOff Official Announcements” (@blastoffzoneANNs), 13,554 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blastoffzoneANNs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.