Wieder ein bekanntes Stimmchen, welches lauter wird 🙏 Quelle Hier noch mehr Perlen finden 🍀 Willkommen bei den Perlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 📣 - https://t.me/PerlenDesTages
👍39🙏4

Channel
@PerlenDesTages
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30,787subscribers
+138 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001785564520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PerlenDesTages |
| Description | In unserer "bekannten" Welt ist viel los. Wir versuchen alles im Blick zu behalten und suchen die Perlen des Tages oder auch Vergessenes zum selber denken, anregen, schmunzeln, lachen und träumen raus - in frei Schnauze Manier 🍀 |
| Created | 10 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PerlenDesTages |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 30,787 | +48 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 30,739 | +107 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:51 | 30,632 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 30,641 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 30,645 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 30,651 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 30,652 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 30,649 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (27 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 386,166 |
| Reactions total | 5,516 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,430 reactions across 36 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,248 | 23.0% | |
| 🤮 | 1,000 | 18.4% | |
| ❤ | 691 | 12.7% | |
| 💯 | 579 | 10.7% | |
| 👏 | 317 | 5.84% | |
| 💩 | 271 | 4.99% | |
| 🤬 | 237 | 4.36% | |
| 😁 | 200 | 3.68% | |
| 🔥 | 130 | 2.39% | |
| 🤡 | 128 | 2.36% | |
| 😈 | 83 | 1.53% | |
| 🥰 | 66 | 1.22% | |
| 👎 | 58 | 1.07% | |
| 🙈 | 56 | 1.03% | |
| 🤣 | 50 | 0.921% | |
| 🍌 | 37 | 0.681% | |
| 😱 | 36 | 0.663% | |
| 💊 | 25 | 0.46% | |
| ⚡ | 23 | 0.424% | |
| 👌 | 18 | 0.331% | |
| 28 further kinds | 177 | 3.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,516reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Wieder ein bekanntes Stimmchen, welches lauter wird 🙏 Quelle Hier noch mehr Perlen finden 🍀 Willkommen bei den Perlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 📣 - https://t.me/PerlenDesTages
👍39🙏4
Berlins Theater-Freibad: Kein Zutritt für Weiße Finanziert mit 300.000 EURO Steuergeld Am kommenden Freitag dürfen Menschen mit weißer Hautfarbe im teuren temporären Freibad der Berliner Volksbühne nicht schwimmen: Das „Volksbad" wird nämlich ausschließlich für schwarze Communitys öffnen. 📌 Das Volksbad darf also nicht vom Volk betreten werden, aber bezahlen dürfen wir die lustige Sause, na alles klar Herr Kommiss…
🤮95😈13🖕6❤3💩3🤡2🔥1🤬1
Und immer steht da einer nebendran und hält die Hand auf... ...nicht dann wenn er Risiko getragen hat, nicht dann wenn er mit aufgebaut hat Tränen, Schweiß und schlaflose Nächte mitgemacht hat, sondern erst dann, wenn es etwas zu holen gibt... Und dieses "normal" nennt sich dann Solidarität 🤷♀ Schöner AHA-Effekt für den, der es noch braucht. Bleibt lieb zueinander ❤️ Quelle Hier noch mehr Perlen finden 🍀 Willk…
💯60👏55❤9❤🔥1👍1
Die Heu(l)schrecken-Liste 30.000€ für eine Wohnung in Berlin? Ich dachte diese Zeiten seien längst vorbei 🤷♀ Sind sie auch aber nicht für alle 😉 Quelle Hier noch mehr Perlen finden 🍀 Willkommen bei den Perlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 📣 - https://t.me/PerlenDesTages
🔥48👍29❤3😁1😴1
Ein Chinesisches Sprichwort sagt:"Das Huhn töten, um an die Eier zu kommen" Eine bessere, verständlichere Erklärung für Deutschland habe ich noch nicht gehört... Quelle Hier noch mehr Perlen finden 🍀 Willkommen bei den Perlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 📣 - https://t.me/PerlenDesTages
🤮65🔥20😢12👍9❤7🤡1
⚡️ Strommangel-Pläne: 4.300 Betriebe müssen sich auf Abschaltungen einstellen Die Bundesnetzagentur baut derzeit die „Sicherheitsplattform Strom“ auf. Rund 4.300 Großverbraucher sollen sich dort registrieren: etwa 3.300 Betriebe mit mehr als 10 GWh Jahresverbrauch und rund 1.000 zwischen 8 und 10 GWh. Kommt es zu einer länger andauernden Strommangellage, können Unternehmen verpflichtet werden, ihren Verbrauch zu re…
🍌36🤡28❤14🤯5🙈3🍾1👏1🦄1
Coca Cola hat ein ganz besonderes Projekt gestartet aber seht selbst 😵💫 Ich hab das natürlich gleich mal ausprobiert aber leider nicht mehr verfügbar (out of stock), sodass nur ein Gedanke bleiben kann - stimmt wohl und auf die Füße geklatscht 🤷♀ Versuch's gerne selbst: https://www.coca-colastore.com/personalized-can Quelle Hier noch mehr Perlen finden 🍀 Willkommen bei den Perlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 📣 - h…
😈48🤮46❤7🤬6🥱3👍1🔥1🤷♀1
Ein großes Perlen-Pfui geht heute an...🥁... Tusch - Anhänger Ich wusste es schon immer, Anhänger, die bösen CO2-Schleudern, sind das wirkliche Übel! Da muss was getan werden, dringend 🤣 Keine Sorge, die EU hat das schon im Blick, wir werden alle gerettet 🙏 Quelle Hier noch mehr Perlen finden 🍀 Willkommen bei den Perlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 📣 - https://t.me/PerlenDesTages
🤡80👎24🙈16🤣10🥴7❤6😈4🔥3
Winter-Files - Hiroshima Atombombe, Senfgas oder Frankfurt? War Hiroshima gar kein Opfer einer Atombombe, sondern "nur" einer herkömmlichen Bombardierung aus der Luft? Quelle Hier noch mehr Perlen finden 🍀 Willkommen bei den Perlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 📣 - https://t.me/PerlenDesTages
💯69👍16❤7👏4🤓3👎1🤔1
Der Preis der Klarheit Wenn du einmal unter die Oberfläche geschaut hast, kannst du es nicht mehr nicht sehen. Quelle Hier noch mehr Perlen finden 🍀 Willkommen bei den Perlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 📣 - https://t.me/PerlenDesTages
💯139❤40👍24👏11🏆2😢1
Ariana Grande, eine Marionette der Illuminati, hat dieses Video kürzlich veröffentlicht, und doch verehren die Leute weiterhin diese Prominenten. Ehrlich gesagt, was braucht es, damit die Menschen die Augen öffnen und verstehen, wer diese Leute wirklich sind? Sie sind Pädophile und sie verehren Satan. CapelloBiancoQ https://t.me/CapelloBiancoQ Rabatte und Empfehlungen https://t.me/ViamEmpfehlungen
🤮205😱12🥴9😈8💯7🤯7❤5🖕3
Danke, Alexandra, für diese wundervolle Eingabe ...welcher ich mich anschließe und hiermit gerne an Euch weitergebe. All das Dunkle da draußen wird nur von ganz Wenigen initiiert und von der großen Masse einfach unbewusst mitgetragen. Es läßt sich nicht beseitigen. Wir dürfen also lernen, ihm aus dem Weg zu gehen und parallel ein eigenes schönes Leben zu führen. Ich kann beteuern, daß es möglich ist und entspreche…
❤137👍37🙏9🥰8🤣4🥱3🕊2🌭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @PerlenDesTages. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 14,393 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 54 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Perlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 🍀” (@PerlenDesTages), 30,787 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PerlenDesTages.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.