Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🌘 Der andere Blickwinkel 🌒

@Blickwinkel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

74,450subscribers

-246 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001602424561
TypeChannel
Username@Blickwinkel
Created27 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Blickwinkel

Growth

74,45074,69674,5736 August 2026 — 74,696 subscribers7 August 2026 — 74,677 subscribers8 August 2026 — 74,652 subscribers9 August 2026 — 74,627 subscribers10 August 2026 — 74,602 subscribers10 August 2026 — 74,564 subscribers12 August 2026 — 74,519 subscribers13 August 2026 — 74,487 subscribers14 August 2026 — 74,450 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -246. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74,413–74,733 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:2474,450-37
13 Aug 2026, 04:2474,487-32
12 Aug 2026, 00:5374,519-45
10 Aug 2026, 23:1874,564-38
10 Aug 2026, 00:4174,602-25
9 Aug 2026, 01:4274,627-25
8 Aug 2026, 02:2274,652-25
7 Aug 2026, 05:0574,677-19
6 Aug 2026, 10:5074,696first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

75,509 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
49,04264.9%
👍19,87126.3%
🥰3,7644.98%
🔥7430.984%
🤔6950.92%
👎4970.658%
😁3420.453%
🤩3370.446%
😢1130.15%
😱1050.139%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75,509reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2024 to 23 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jan 2026, 05:44 UTC≈105,000 views1,108 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

https://youtube.com/live/R0gaELrftfk?feature=share

783👍234🥰30👎27😁11🔥9🤔7😱7

23 Jan 2026, 05:44 UTC≈88,800 views1,788 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Trump in Davos - Seid [Ihr] bereit Gutes zu tun ? Carsten & Irene 21.01.2026

1,210👍442🥰48👎47🤔19😁12🔥10

30 Nov 2025, 13:49 UTC≈147,000 views2,738 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Zu viel Info - Zu wenig Zeit - Carsten & Irene 29.11.2025

1,930👍553🥰139🤔47👎46😁11🔥10🤩2

30 Nov 2025, 13:48 UTC≈124,000 views1,215 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @SC360MediaPhoto

https://www.youtube.com/live/5HKpsvoHNAY?si=4ExEWkTTa_brt8Hs

897👍235🥰41👎17🔥15🤔7😁3

28 Oct 2025, 09:26 UTC≈172,000 views4,677 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Zu viel Info – zu wenig Zeit 28.10.2025 Der Feind kommt von Innen – Israel at last – die Wahrheit braucht ein schnelles Pferd Zum Lesen: https://t.me/ZvizwZ/364 zum Kanal: https://t.me/Blickwinkel

3,280👍1,010🥰204🤩54🔥48🤔37😁29👎9

15 May 2025, 06:57 UTC≈272,000 views4,649 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Zu viel Info – zu wenig Zeit 15.05.2025 „Manchmal scheint es, als würden sie dies und das mit Sicherheit nicht tun, weil es ihnen schadet, aber sie tun es, Idioten, ups, entschuldigen Sie bitte“ – Präsident Putin. Zum Kanal: https://t.me/Blickwinkel zum Lesen: https://t.me/ZvizwZ/363

3,060👍1,170🥰128🤔76🔥72🤩40👎34😢30

6 Apr 2025, 07:21 UTC≈300,000 views4,006 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Zu viel Info – zu wenig Zeit 06.04.2025 Das Buffet ist eröffnet und für jeden ist etwas dabei Zum Kanal: https://t.me/Blickwinkel Zum Lesen: https://t.me/ZvizwZ/362

2,660👍1,090🥰145😁35🔥31🤔18🤩14😱7

20 Mar 2025, 07:27 UTC≈286,000 views3,734 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Zu viel Info – zu wenig Zeit 20.03.2025 Von Mammutbäumen und Bonsai Na? Schwirrt der Kopf? Zum Kanal: https://t.me/Blickwinkel Zum Lesen: https://t.me/ZvizwZ/361

2,430👍1,030🥰125🔥55🤩30😁22👎21🤔21

6 Mar 2025, 13:40 UTC≈278,000 views1,581 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @auf1tv

🤥💉 Fake News! Anwältin Bahner zu EuGH-Urteil: Ärzte haften nicht für Impfschäden! Aufruhr in sozialen Medien: Denn angeblich sollen nun Ärzte doch für Impfschäden haften, wie ein Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs nahelege. Verschiedene Postings von Juristen oder Ärzten deuten jedenfalls darauf hin. Doch ist an diesen Behauptungen wirklich etwas dran? Dazu hat AUF1 exklusiv mit der Fachanwältin für Medizinrecht, B

👍1,100222🤔117👎43😢43😱27🔥16😁13

6 Mar 2025, 13:40 UTC≈199,000 views1,418 reactionsread 14 August 2026

‼️Berichtigung‼️ In der heutigen Sendung ZvI-zwZ vom 06.03.2025, habe ich berichtet, dass Ärzte für die Impfschäden ihrer Patienten haften müssen. Die Fachanwältin für Medizinrecht Beate Bahner stellte fest, dass dies eben genau nicht so sei! Ärzte haften also nicht!

👍873🤔207160👎61🔥56😱36😢11🥰10

6 Mar 2025, 07:46 UTC≈154,000 views2,958 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Zu viel Info – zu wenig Zeit 06.03.2025 Vom Käfig in die Freilandhaltung? Zum Kanal: https://t.me/Blickwinkel Zum Lesen: https://t.me/ZvizwZ/359

1,960👍839🥰85🔥29👎14🤔12😱7🤩6

1 Mar 2025, 08:17 UTC≈194,000 views6,905 reactionsread 14 August 2026

‼️In eigener Sache‼️ Liebe Hörer und treue Follower, Wie euch sicher aufgefallen ist, werden jetzt in allen Kanälen, von Seiten TG, Werbungen geschaltet. Wir als Kanalbetreiber können diese Werbung weder sehen, noch haben wir auf das Beworbene einen Einfluss. Jede geschaltete Werbung bringt dem Kanalbetreiber ungebeten und ungefragt virtuelles Geld ein. Dieses "Geld" kann auch nur vom Besitzer des Kanales gesehen o

👍4,0702,380🥰354🔥45😁26👎16🤩13🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Blickwinkel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 583,631 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌘 Der andere Blickwinkel 🌒” (@Blickwinkel), 74,450 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Blickwinkel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.