https://youtu.be/CuZ8VsGcqDk?is=V39-1A_zuvctZ49y Wie versprochen noch ein paar Inputs zu Cern und dem Teilchenbeschleuniger bzw welche Frequenzen da wirken Ich poste euch später noch eine Grafik, die ich mit der KI erstellt hab, zum besseren Verständnis/ anschaulich erklärt 😊

Channel
BewusstseinsImpulse
@BewusstseinsImpulse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001415597155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BewusstseinsImpulse |
| Description | Zeit zum aufwachen |
| Created | 3 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BewusstseinsImpulse |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 46 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 46 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.8%
- avg views ÷ 46 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10.9
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 13.6%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (13 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 153 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,690
- Videos
- ≈729
- Links
- ≈1,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 44s
- Average length
- 1m 52s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://kosmischesgefluester.blog/2026/08/05/current-update-5-8/
https://youtu.be/Nns1fppTBlU?is=TVVodsjkef7NtRmI
https://kosmischesgefluester.blog/2026/07/30/current-update-30-7/
Jo eh..ich sprech aus Erfahrung, diese Sätze haben bei mir immer einen Knopf gedrückt, der mich zum Rumpelstilzchen werden lässt..wie soll ich loslassen, fließen lassen, sein..wenn mich mein Thema Tag & Nacht beschäftigt..wenns so einfach wäre, es loszuwerden..hätten das bestimmt schon mehrere von uns gemacht..und die Technik dafür verkauft 🤪 Wobei man ja ehrlich sein muss..diese Phrasen klingen auch befreiend..un…
3. Teil des Fragen Zyklus ✨️„Lösen sich wirklich alle alten Strukturen, Traumata, Energien, Muster, Ahnenthemen aus uns und unseren Zellen? Müssen wir dafür was tun oder geht das von alleine?"✨️ Oft wird diese Frage mit einem großen JA beantwortet..ich schreib mal, wie ich es wirklich erlebe/ beobachte. Meine ehrliche Antwort ist..Nein. Nicht alles löst sich einfach auf und ich halte diese Vorstellung/ Versprechun…
Gefunden bei never9to5_vanlife. Ein kleiner Blick über den Tellerrand hinaus. 🐾 @neue_erde 🫧 Doku
Nun zur DNA. Weil das ein Wort ist, das im spirituellen Feld sehr oft fällt..und da vieles herumgeistert an Theorien.. Baut sich die DNA um? In der wörtlichen Bedeutung? Nein.. Deine Basenpaare schreiben sich nicht plötzlich neu, weil du meditierst oder weil Schumann-Resonanzen ansteigen. Aber was sich verändert, ist die Genexpression, das nennt die Wissenschaft Epigenetik. Epigenetik bedeutet nicht deine Gene selb…
2. Teil des Fragen Zyklus ✨️Was genau passiert wirklich mit uns? Baut sich der Körper um? Baut sich die DNA um?✨️ Diese Fragen begleiten mich seit Jahren. Weil ich so viele Menschen sehe, die spüren, dass etwas passiert. Die nachts wach liegen, weil der Körper summt und vibriert, die morgens aufwachen, als hätten sie die ganze Nacht gearbeitet, ohne zu wissen, was genau, die Dinge wahrnehmen.. Energien, Stimmungen,…
Worte von Eva-Maria Eleni ✨ ihren Kanal findest du hier „DA IST SO VIEL MEHR, was auf dich wartet! Wir haben uns eine sehr merkwürdige Art angewöhnt, dem Leben zu begegnen! Und leider dient sie uns so gar nicht! Wir stehen dem Leben an so vielen Stellen im Weg, sabotieren und verwirren uns selbst! Doch es gibt einen Weg da hinaus - einen, der alle Unklarheit immer umfassender aushebeln kann! Der Denker wurde so t…
Eine wundervolle Liebeserklärung an die deutsche Volksseele😊... Und es ist Zeit uns endlich wieder daran zu erinnern welche Macht in unserer Sprache liegt🗝️✨ https://youtu.be/T6jiBChax3E?is=EV_fdZwpVRWd8_0Q
💥Den Träumern, den Mutigen und den Freigeistern gewidmet💥 Für alle, die mit dem Wind sprechen. Für die Liebenden und die Visionäre. Für jene, die einem Traum Leben einhauchen wollen. Für die Ausgestoßenen und die Verlorenen. Für die wirklich oder vermeintlich Verrückten. Für die Menschen mit einem guten Herzen. Für jene, die am Glauben festhalten. Für Herzen, die aufrichtig fühlen. Für alle, die noch in Bewe…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @BewusstseinsImpulse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,331,308 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@lichtpost · 3,3415 posts💞Gelebte Gesundheit der neuen Zeit
@gelebtegesundheitderneuenzeit · 3,1572 postsAktuelle Energien - Sonnenstürme, Schumann-Frequenz und Zeitqualitäten
@aktuelleenergien · 12,2371 postGedankenzünder
@gedankenzuender · 11,2381 post🌿Heckenweib🌿 - Leben im Einklang mit Mutter Natur
@heckenweib · 2291 post☉ 🐝 Ɲєuє єR𝕯є ♾️ คltєs WissєN ☀️ ☉
@neue_erde · 22,5861 postPerlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 🍀
@PerlenDesTages · 30,8491 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@lichtpost · 3,3413 postsEva-Maria Eleni
@eva_maria_eleni · 1,3151 postGedankenzünder
@gedankenzuender · 11,2381 post☉ 🐝 Ɲєuє єR𝕯є ♾️ คltєs WissєN ☀️ ☉
@neue_erde · 22,5861 post🐝🍄 Neue Erde ♾️ Doku 🌿
@neue_erde_doku · 3,5291 postPerlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 🍀
@PerlenDesTages · 30,8491 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BewusstseinsImpulse” (@BewusstseinsImpulse), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BewusstseinsImpulse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.