Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net -1,042. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,873–43,227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 18:31
42,029
-29
8 Nov 2026, 09:05
42,058
-8
7 Nov 2026, 04:27
42,066
-5
6 Nov 2026, 00:50
42,071
-20
5 Nov 2026, 00:18
42,091
-5
4 Nov 2026, 00:36
42,096
-14
3 Nov 2026, 00:18
42,110
-10
1 Nov 2026, 23:47
42,120
+1
31 Oct 2026, 23:56
42,119
-16
31 Oct 2026, 00:45
42,135
-11
29 Oct 2026, 23:06
42,146
-22
28 Oct 2026, 20:47
42,168
-4
27 Oct 2026, 17:16
42,172
-1
26 Oct 2026, 20:05
42,173
-11
25 Oct 2026, 19:20
42,184
-13
24 Oct 2026, 21:37
42,197
-6
24 Oct 2026, 01:10
42,203
-15
22 Oct 2026, 23:16
42,218
-17
21 Oct 2026, 19:21
42,235
-22
20 Oct 2026, 13:34
42,257
first reading
Engagement
119 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 42,029 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,990
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 119 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
119 (2 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
389,500
Reactions total
4,717
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 01:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,050
Videos
≈255
Links
≈1,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 23s
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20,661 reactions across 119 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,015
43.6%
👍
6,270
30.3%
👏
900
4.36%
😁
763
3.69%
💯
688
3.33%
🤣
653
3.16%
🥰
471
2.28%
😡
221
1.07%
🤡
205
0.992%
🙈
170
0.823%
🙏
170
0.823%
🤔
157
0.76%
😢
156
0.755%
😘
138
0.668%
😇
90
0.436%
🔥
70
0.339%
👌
60
0.29%
🎉
59
0.286%
👎
52
0.252%
👀
35
0.169%
32 further kinds
318
1.54%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,661 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (12.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👆 Die Brände der Glaspaläste, in denen die ersten Welt- und Gewerbeausstellungen stattfinden, ergeben ein recht auffälliges Muster:
- Das Paleis voor Volksvlijt in Amsterdam brannte 1929 bis auf die Galerie nieder
- Der Münchner Glaspalast brannte 1931 vollständig nieder - kurz vor einer wichtigen Kunstausstellung. Offizielle Ursache: Brandstiftung, aber die Täter wurden nie gefunden.
- Der Londoner Kristallpalast…
Der Münchner Glaspalast wurde 1853/54 nach dem Londoner Vorbild ( Crystal Palace ) von Architekt August von Voit für die Erste Deutsche Industrieausstellung erbaut. Dank vorgefertigter Gusseisen- und Glaselemente stand die 250 Meter lange Halle in nur knapp vier Monaten. Später diente das Gebäude vor allem als bedeutendes Zentrum für Kunstausstellungen. Am 6. Juni 1931 wurde der Glaspalast durch ein verheerendes Feue…
Städte auf dem Meeresgrund des Atlantiks
Wissenschaftler aus mehreren Ländern haben fast zeitgleich geheimnisvolle Strukturen auf dem Meeresgrund des Atlantiks entdeckt. Sie ähneln einer riesigen Unterwasserbrücke (fast 40 Kilometer lang).
Von dieser Brücke führen Unterwasserstraßen zu einer noch rätselhafteren Struktur mit einer Größe von etwa 250 mal 140 Kilometern. Der gesamte Komplex wirkt künstlich, ist aber n…
Danke an Reno für diesen Kommentar zu meinem heutigen Video: 😃
Auf meinem Arbeitsweg mit dem Auto (ca. 45 Min.) höre ich mir oft jemanden auf YouTube an. Auch dir, lieber Kai, folge ich seit Jahren. Über Flo und Chnopfloch bin ich auf dich gestossen.
Ich finde es gut, dass einige Kanäle mittlerweile über Vergangenes berichten. Was ich allerdings schade finde: Alle gehen irgendwie gleich vor und erzählen mehr oder w…
Neues Video: Die Alte Welt bringt uns nicht weiter
✅ https://youtu.be/Xs5D1fjLSUc
Ich liebe das Thema Alte Welt und doch stelle ich immer wieder fest, dass uns noch mehr Informationen dann nicht weiterbringen, wenn wir sie uns nicht auch bewusst machen.
Wenn wir uns bewusst machen, dass es mehrere Einschübe in unsere Geschichte gegeben hat, dann kommt ein sehr ungewöhnliches Gefühl in unser Leben, dass uns sagt, da…
Kurzer Hinweis:
Meine nächsten Live-Veranstaltungen sind:
13.-15.11. Volition:
Hier halte ich am Samstag einen Vortrag über die Alte Welt und den Reset.
>>> Zur Anmeldung: https://volition14.at/v12-buchung/#anmeldung
20.11. Vortrag zur Alten Welt in Wadrill (kostenfrei):
Adresse: Forsthofstraße 3 - 66687 Wadrill im "Forsthoflichtspiele".
Start ist um 18:00.
21.11.2026 Tages-Seminar zur Alten Welt in Wadrill (n…
👆 Wer ebenfalls noch was Gutes zu Lesen braucht:
Mein Buch "Die ALTE WELT - Die Menschheit am Beginn eines neuen Zyklus".
👉 Auf Amazon: https://amzn.to/3UrrvaF
👉 Bei Thalia: https://www.thalia.de/shop/home/artikeldetails/A1081417697
Ich wünsche euch eine wundervolle Herbstzeit! 😃
Vielen Dank auch nochmal für 206.000 Abonnenten auf meinem Youtube-Kanal!
Seit über 10 Jahren begleiten mich viele von euch nun schon auf meiner Reise.
Auf die nächsten 10 wundervollen Jahre! 😃
Wer keine Zeit und nur mal kurz ins Video reinschnuppern möchte, für den habe ich dieses Kurzvideo erstellt 😃:
✅ https://youtube.com/shorts/CUis7mElW9E
👍25👏6❤3🥰3😇1
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @kaibrenner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@kaibrenner edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 September 2026
Most recent edit
1 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @kaibrenner as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
26 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BaumMentor die EnergieKultur @BFE_Energiekultur · 60,965 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 August 2026
🏛TEMPEL DER AHNEN🏛 @tempelderahnen · 21,502 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
Chemtrails/Haarp/Wettermanipulation @KanalChemtrailsHaarp · 35,946 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
Catherines Blick @t5mtxr8b · 23,136 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 September 2026
HDK - HINTER DEN KULISSEN @HDKTelegram · 41,378 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
FREQUENCY HUB 〰️, @Frequency_Hub · 34,969 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
Nuoviso @Nuoviso · 51,369 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
Krisenrat.info Peter Denk @krisenrat · 34,596 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
Trau keinem Promi offiziell @traukeinempromioffiziell · 39,153 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
Christina von Dreien Offiziell @christinavondreien · 26,802 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
Werner Altnickel, Lebenswerk (Offizieller Kanal) @WernerAltnickelAbsicherung · 20,345 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 September 2026
Bewusst-Vegan-Froh 🍎 @bewusst_vegan_froh · 31,282 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
RPP Institut - Offiziell @rppinstitut · 60,864 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
Sören Schumann - Gesundheit Ganzheitlich @soeren_schumann · 60,014 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
YGDRASOUL @YGDRASOUL · 43,009 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Nichts Neues unter der Sonne @Xavier_Naidoo · 35,686 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 September 2026
WissenSchafft Freiheit @WissenSchafftFreiheit · 46,100 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
Geistheiler Sananda Offizieller Kanal @geistheilersananda · 26,383 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 September 2026
Wächter der Erde @GuardiansofGaia · 57,707 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
☠️ Giftige Wahrheit @GiftigeWahrheit · 34,381 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 September 2026
MICHAEL WENDLER 🚨 & TEAM @michaelwendlerlive · 39,809 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
🌘 Der andere Blickwinkel 🌒 @Blickwinkel · 71,817 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Pavlina Klemm – Plejadische Intelligenz @pavlinaklemmlichtbotschaften · 26,728 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
Sun Evo News @sunevonews · 40,280 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kai Brenner - Per Du mit dem Leben😃” (@kaibrenner), 42,029 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaibrenner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.