Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🎬 Kessy Cuts 🎬

Channel

🎬 Kessy Cuts 🎬

@KessyCuts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,401subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001533138183
TypeChannel
Username@KessyCuts
Description🌷Hier findet ihr Projekte, an denen ich mitwirke, ob als Cutter, Übersetzerin oder Sprecherin. Ein Mix aus News, dokumentarischen Themen, Recherchen oder Balsam für die Seele. ✨freiwilliges Trinkgeld: http://paypal.me/kessycuts Danke!
Created19 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
On Telegramt.me/KessyCuts

Growth

7,4017,4377,4196 August 2026 — 7,437 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,433 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,428 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,423 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,416 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,406 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,401 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,401 subscribers6 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,396–7,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 20:447,401no change
25 Aug 2026, 13:227,401-5
22 Aug 2026, 17:137,406-10
19 Aug 2026, 14:227,416-7
16 Aug 2026, 14:557,423-5
12 Aug 2026, 19:437,428-5
9 Aug 2026, 17:417,433-4
6 Aug 2026, 09:537,437first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 211,464 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🌘 Der andere Blickwinkel 🌒
@Blickwinkel · 74,035
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Dirk Dietrich
@DDDDoffiziell · 55,908
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
Wahrheitsjäger
@Wahrheits_jaeger · 83,510
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
LION Media TV
@LIONMediaTV · 105,067
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🎬 Kessy Cuts 🎬” (@KessyCuts), 7,401 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KessyCuts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.