Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Heilkraft der Natur Manufaktur ๐Ÿ„๐ŸŒฑ๐Ÿ€โค๏ธ๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿ„

@Angelika99991111

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

8,367subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001240399314
TypeChannel
Username@Angelika99991111
Created23 January 2021 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Angelika99991111

Growth

8,3678,3848,375.56 August 2026 โ€” 8,379 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 8,380 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 8,384 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 8,367 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 8,364โ€“8,387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:058,367-17
9 Aug 2026, 17:228,384+4
6 Aug 2026, 20:408,380+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:038,379first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
7.24%
avg views รท 8,367 subscribers
Avg views / post
606
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.706%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held58 (31 July 2026 โ€“ 12 August 2026)
Views total35,125
Reactions total178
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58m 17s
Average length
2m 47s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 38 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค13681.4%
๐Ÿ‘116.59%
๐Ÿ™116.59%
๐Ÿ‘42.40%
๐Ÿฅฐ21.20%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ10.599%
๐Ÿ”ฅ10.599%
๐Ÿคฉ10.599%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC35 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

11.9.26 Die Medizin der Zukunftโ€ผ๏ธ HEILKRAFT DER NATUR ๐ŸŒฟ Bist du bereit, dich selbst mit diesen Mรถglichkeiten, deine Gesundheit zu erhalten? Oder dein eigener Arzt zu sein โ“ Nach diesem Abend, kรถnntest du beginnen โ€ผ๏ธ Die Heilpilze vor deiner Tรผr und die starken Krรคuter.โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฏ Wie du sie anwendest und zur starken Medizin verarbeitest.๐Ÿ„ Der Fliegenpilz ๐Ÿ„ und seine unglaubliche Wirkung. Wie wir giftige Substanzen undโ€ฆ

Signed Petra

12 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC212 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mutaerztePhoto

๐„๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ ๐š๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ž๐ซ ๐ƒ๐ƒ๐‘ ๐ ๐ž๐Ÿ๐ฅ๐จ๐ก๐ž๐ง, ๐ฃ๐ž๐ญ๐ณ๐ญ ๐š๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ž๐ซ ๐๐‘๐ƒ ๐ƒ๐ข๐ž ๐ฎ๐ง๐Ÿ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ๐›๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐†๐ž๐ฌ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐œ๐ก๐ญ๐ž ๐๐ž๐ซ ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ฅ๐ ๐ญ๐ž๐ง ๐€ฬˆ๐ซ๐ณ๐ญ๐ข๐ง ๐ƒ๐ซ. ๐‚๐š๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ๐š ๐‰๐š๐ฏ๐ข๐-๐Š๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ฅ ๐‘ด๐’Š๐’„๐’‰๐’‚๐’†๐’ ๐‘ฏ๐’‚๐’–๐’Œ๐’†: ๐’˜๐’†๐’Š๐’•๐’†๐’“๐’†๐’” ๐’ƒ๐’†๐’Œ๐’๐’†๐’Ž๐’Ž๐’†๐’๐’…๐’†๐’” ๐’๐’†๐’Š๐’•๐’›๐’†๐’–๐’ˆ๐’๐’Š๐’” ๐’…๐’†๐’“ ๐‘จฬˆ๐’“๐’›๐’•๐’†๐’—๐’†๐’“๐’‡๐’๐’๐’ˆ๐’–๐’๐’ˆ ๐’Š๐’Ž 21. ๐‘ฑ๐’‚๐’‰๐’“๐’‰๐’–๐’๐’…๐’†๐’“๐’• "Fรผr meinen aktuellen Leitartikel habe ich mich intensiv mit Carola DrJavid-Kistel unterhalten. Herausgekommen ist ein weiteres beklemmendes Zeitzeugnis der ร„rzteverfolgung im 21. Jahrhundert. Wegen 16 Maskenbefrโ€ฆ

โค2

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

12 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC469 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/BgeM5C8czxU?is=DAeq6fymcHyMoyHL

๐Ÿ‘1

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

11 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC466 viewsread 12 August 2026

Wer kennt diesen Mann?

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

11 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC590 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/9lNPfIxmspU?is=ctb1WVrRvMGC7bqN

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

11 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC441 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Und richtig gut sieht Giraffenholz aus ๐Ÿคฉ Xylaria

๐Ÿ‘1

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

11 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC452 viewsread 12 August 2026

Derzeit gibt es nur einen Pilz der dazu etwas zu bieten hat, dafรผr ist das Ergebnis dann so richtig gut: Fichtenporling / Rotrandiger Baumschwamm hat dazu eine recht frische Studie. Der Pilz geht sogar die erreger im Biofilm an. Mehr dazu auf https://www.heimische-heilpilze.at/fichtenporling/

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

11 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTC465 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/A3i3cY_giQs?is=iEnrv3hmBjAh_A6V

๐Ÿฅฐ2โค1

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

11 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC576 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Keine 432 hz

โค3

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

11 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC591 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Huhu liebe Angelika, Spike verstรคndlich erklรคrt. Vielleicht kannst du das fรผr deine Arbeit gut gebrauchen. Herzliche GrรผรŸe Sabine https://dioxitube.com/w/q4Xky2NfGd1mrG2ous2geB

โค1

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

11 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC527 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.naturheilkunde-neckar-alb.de/waldbaden-kinder

โค2

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

11 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC446 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kriegsberichterstattung17Video

๐Ÿ˜Ž

โค7๐Ÿคฉ1

Signed Angelika Verein Akademie fรผr Naturforschung

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @Angelika99991111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 68,910 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œHeilkraft der Natur Manufaktur ๐Ÿ„๐ŸŒฑ๐Ÿ€โค๏ธ๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿ„โ€ (@Angelika99991111), 8,367 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Angelika99991111.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.