Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -2,804. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90,017–93,663 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 07:49
90,438
-25
6 Nov 2026, 08:57
90,463
-35
5 Nov 2026, 09:00
90,498
-30
4 Nov 2026, 09:39
90,528
-45
3 Nov 2026, 07:09
90,573
-26
2 Nov 2026, 08:57
90,599
-31
1 Nov 2026, 10:35
90,630
-32
31 Oct 2026, 09:28
90,662
-32
30 Oct 2026, 09:44
90,694
-40
29 Oct 2026, 06:50
90,734
-32
28 Oct 2026, 07:19
90,766
-26
27 Oct 2026, 09:18
90,792
-21
26 Oct 2026, 08:17
90,813
-29
25 Oct 2026, 11:47
90,842
-37
24 Oct 2026, 10:06
90,879
-25
23 Oct 2026, 12:26
90,904
-34
22 Oct 2026, 11:45
90,938
-45
21 Oct 2026, 02:38
90,983
-43
19 Oct 2026, 22:08
91,026
-27
19 Oct 2026, 00:15
91,053
first reading
Engagement
406 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 190 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.89%
avg views ÷ 90,438 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,140
117 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.888%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
118
of 406 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
406 (2 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
835,040
Reactions total
7,419
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 06:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈15,600
Videos
≈12,000
Links
≈22,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
24h 47m
Average length
5m 23s
Measured directly from 276 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,445 reactions across 401 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
9,711
38.2%
😍
6,152
24.2%
🤣
2,958
11.6%
🔥
1,861
7.31%
💯
1,822
7.16%
🙏
958
3.76%
😢
666
2.62%
😱
660
2.59%
👎
657
2.58%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 405 of the 406 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,595 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 406 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 118 posts held from the last 30 days (4.24%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
DER TYP - SIGNAL (Rapbellions)
"Ich glaube, dass mein Glaube für mein kindliches Qi spricht,
das die Klarheit nicht verliert im finsteren Zwielicht."
Dieses Video teilen auf:
TikTok | Instagram | YouTube
DENKT DRAN - DENKT SELBST
👉🏼FaktenFriedenFreiheit
Im Winter verbringen wir fast den ganzen Tag drinnen. Heizungsluft statt Waldluft. Kein Wunder, dass wir uns so oft schlapp fühlen. 😩
Kennst du das klare, wache Gefühl nach einem Spaziergang im Wald? Ein Grund dafür sind negative Ionen. In der Natur schwirren Tausende pro Kubikzentimeter durch die Luft. In geheizten Räumen sind es oft nur wenige Hundert. Die Fenster bleiben zu.
Das neowake® Energy Bracelet ist ein …
»Lieber Hören statt Lesen? Klick auf's Bild 😉
»KENNST DU DIESES LÄRMENDE RAUSCHEN IN DEINEM KOPF?«
„Boah, kann jemand diesen Lärm, dieses fast dröhnende permanente Rauschen in meinem Kopf mal abstellen?“ – diese Frage kommt mir, als ich im Bett liege und plötzlich merke: Es ist einfach nie still! Und gerade scheint es lauter zu sein als sonst. So, wie auch gestern schon.
War es jemals still in meinem Kopf? Ich mei…
»Für's Anhören der Audio - klicke auf's Bild 😉
»WAS WÄRE, WENN . . .«
Du Dich nicht länger in äußeren Dramen verstrickst,
weil Du beschließt, nicht länger einer Angst zu folgen.
Weil du erkannt hast, dass Angst wirklich niemals ein guter Ratgeber ist?
Was wäre, wenn Du Dich von möglichen schlimmen Horrorszenarien einfach abwendest, weil Du erkannt hast, dass Du damit weder Dir selbst noch der Welt dienst.
Weil du…
jetzt gibt es kein Zurück mehr
🎭 Nach 6 Jahren zeige ich mein Gesicht 👀
das bedeutet auch: wieder neue Rabbit Research-Videos!
Nach über sechs Jahren gebe ich meine Anonymität auf.
Warum ich mich zu diesem Schritt entschieden habe und was das mit einem völlig neuen Kapitel von Rabbit Research zu tun hat, erfahrt ihr in
👇👇👇
🎥 diesem Video
Das wird ein spannender Weg!
Ich freu mich darauf ihn mit euch gemeinsam zu…
🚫 Bis zu 2.500 € Bußgeld. Und trotzdem entscheidest du.
Rafaela spricht auf Instagram über ganzheitliche Gesundheit für Mama und Kind. Das ZDF hat sie in der Reportage „Die Spur“ gezeigt. Thema: Eltern, die die Masernimpfung ihrer Kinder umgehen.
Sie hat das nicht so stehen lassen.
„Ich möchte niemandem vorschreiben, was er zu denken oder zu entscheiden hat.“
Und rechtlich ist die Lage klar:
⚖️ Seit März 2020 ve…
Wenn plötzlich alles zu viel wird …
Kennst du das? Du machst und tust, erledigst eine Sache nach der anderen und irgendwann fragst du dich: Wie komme ich eigentlich aus diesem Hamsterrad wieder raus?
Was wäre, wenn die Lösung gar nicht darin liegt, noch mehr zu schaffen, sondern etwas ganz anderes zu verändern?
Genau darüber sprechen wir in unserer neuen Podcastfolge von „Gedanken aus der Natur“ mit Dr. Heidi Wich…
⚡️ PROFESSOR DR. KLINGHARDT SAGT, WAS NIEMAND HÖREN WILL.
⏱️ Schau dir das Video oben an. Der größte Vergiftungsfaktor auf diesem Planeten sind laut Klinghardt nicht Pestizide. Nicht dein Deo. Nicht Plastikflaschen. Es ist das, was über uns allen am Himmel liegt, egal ob du in der Stadt wohnst oder auf dem Land.
☁️ Aluminium. Barium. Strontium.
Tag für Tag, Jahr für Jahr. Klinghardt sagt: Der Aluminiumgehalt in uns…
👍37💯21👎4🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 406 posts we hold for @FaktenFriedenFreiheit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@FaktenFriedenFreiheit edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 114 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 69 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@FaktenFriedenFreiheit named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@gartentipps named in 6 posts, 24 September 2026 – 31 October 2026
@verborgene_wahrheit named in 4 posts, 28 September 2026 – 8 October 2026
@expresszeitung named in 3 posts, 20 September 2026 – 31 October 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
LION Media @LIONMediaNews · 132,477 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Eva Herman Offiziell @EvaHermanOffiziell · 188,044 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Alles Ausser Mainstream @AllesAusserMainstream · 108,345 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Ken Jebsen - Aufklärung und Information @kenjebsen · 121,506 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Oliver Janich & Team @oliverjanich · 106,292 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
AUF1 @auf1tv · 272,026 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Freie Sachsen @freiesachsen · 108,335 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Anti-Spiegel - Offizieller Kanal @AntiSpiegel · 121,765 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Neues aus Russland 🪆📢 Alina Lipp @neuesausrussland · 160,360 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fakten Frieden Freiheit” (@FaktenFriedenFreiheit), 90,438 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FaktenFriedenFreiheit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.