Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MistyG

@MistyG17

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,184subscribers

-73 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001481320011
TypeChannel
Username@MistyG17
Created19 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MistyG17

Growth

16,18416,25716,220.56 August 2026 — 16,257 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,257 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,256 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,237 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,228 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,214 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,192 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,184 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,173–16,268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:2216,184-8
11 Aug 2026, 03:1216,192-22
10 Aug 2026, 00:3116,214-14
8 Aug 2026, 23:5016,228-9
7 Aug 2026, 22:0816,237-19
6 Aug 2026, 20:3216,256-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:5216,257no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4116,257first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
12,600
Videos
9,230
Links
8,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 20s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,367 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,38544.4%
🙏70713.2%
🔥62911.7%
💯4578.51%
👍2534.71%
❤‍🔥2204.10%
🤡2113.93%
😁1382.57%
🥰821.53%
🤮631.17%
🎉561.04%
💩460.857%
👏310.578%
🖕270.503%
🫡190.354%
😈130.242%
80.149%
🥴80.149%
🤣50.093%
🍌40.075%
4 further kinds50.093%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,367reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2024 to 21 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Feb 2025, 22:41 UTC≈17,100 views313 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheStormHasArrived17Video

This part was absolutely badass. Kash told the fake news media to bring it on💥 “I know the media is in here. If you have a target, that target is right here. It’s not the men & women at the FBI. You’ve written everything you possibly can about me that’s fake, malicious, slanderous, and defamatory. Keep it coming. Bring it on. But leave the men & women of the FBI out of it. They deserve better.” This is gonna be th

🔥197❤‍🔥4331🙏22👍13👏3💩3😁1

21 Feb 2025, 22:06 UTC≈13,800 views143 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Kash has been sworn in 🎉🎉 https://t.me/realKarliBonne/287795

111🫡13🙏9👍4🔥3💩2🤔1

21 Feb 2025, 00:20 UTC≈54,400 views209 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

President Trump’s smile says it all!! https://x.com/scavino47/status/1892726763207131253?s=46&t=a0Tg7drl3yg0yw1Sn5MgUg

159🔥26🙏15👍5💩3💯1

20 Feb 2025, 19:31 UTC≈8,870 views179 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @WeTheMediaVideo

🎥

136🥰18🙏12😁10💩3

20 Feb 2025, 19:27 UTC≈8,300 views130 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

108👍14🙏6💩2

20 Feb 2025, 19:27 UTC≈5,840 views215 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @jordansatherPhoto

Kash Patel has now sealed enough votes to be CONFIRMED as FBI Director!!

128🎉55🔥21🙏9💩2

20 Feb 2025, 17:46 UTC≈4,560 views180 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @PepeMatterVideo

The reason why Adam Schiff is panicking outside the FBI building this morning: Kash Patel told us that Adam Schiff is the worst criminal in Congress in the last 250 years. And that he must be investigated for his role in the whistleblower impeachment hoax. "The guy that found and manufactured the evidence was the prosecutor in the case against the target of the investigation. That is the ultimate conflict of inter

108🔥51🙏11👏8💩2

20 Feb 2025, 15:11 UTC≈50,400 views258 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Happy Kash Confirmation Day!! The Government Gangsters are already in panic mode. Let’s get this done!!

152🙏50🔥27👍11🥴7😁5💩4🍌1

16 Feb 2025, 18:53 UTC≈5,940 views173 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheStormHasArrived17Video

President Trump gives an interview at the Daytona 500 with his granddaughter by his side 🇺🇸 How can you not love this man? https://x.com/thestormredux/status/1891198785293873423

133❤‍🔥31🙏7👍2

16 Feb 2025, 18:52 UTC≈5,190 views160 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheStormHasArrived17Video

Loud cheers for POTUS when he was shown on the big screen during the national anthem🫡🇺🇸 https://x.com/thestormredux/status/1891195647430201361

124❤‍🔥20🙏13👍3

14 Feb 2025, 14:28 UTC≈6,530 views196 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @NevsChannelVideo

Happy Valentines Day frens 💚

169🥰13🙏8👍6

13 Feb 2025, 18:05 UTC≈64,000 views704 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Adam Schiff is nearly in tears pretending to care about the people of the FBI, when in reality he knows this is the end for him... Kash has never held back. Accountability is coming! Who’s ready for this POS to go down?

💯445😁122👍42🙏31🤡29💩15🤮7🫡6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MistyG17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 423,002 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MistyG” (@MistyG17), 16,184 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MistyG17.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.