Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Brian Cates ✪✪✪

@drawandstrikechannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40,093subscribers

-217 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001264643776
TypeChannel
Username@drawandstrikechannel
DescriptionI get paid to write stuff that annoys all the right people. It's awesome. Speak The TRUTH Even If Your Voice SHAKES
Created14 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drawandstrikechannel

Growth

40,09340,31040,201.56 August 2026 — 40,310 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,304 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,267 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,238 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,218 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,167 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,135 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,122 subscribers14 August 2026 — 40,093 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,060–40,343 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:2540,093-29
12 Aug 2026, 22:4840,122-13
11 Aug 2026, 19:4240,135-32
10 Aug 2026, 22:1140,167-51
10 Aug 2026, 01:1440,218-20
9 Aug 2026, 02:5240,238-29
8 Aug 2026, 03:3840,267-37
7 Aug 2026, 06:0040,304-6
6 Aug 2026, 09:5240,310first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18,600
Videos
5,740
Links
19,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
20m 28s
Average length
6m 49s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19,809 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4,96425.1%
😁2,77414.0%
🤬2,68013.5%
🤔2,64313.3%
🔥2,41612.2%
🙏1,0705.40%
💯7974.02%
6953.51%
🤡5352.70%
💩3531.78%
🤯2061.04%
👏1890.954%
😱1840.929%
🥱820.414%
👎780.394%
🤮520.263%
310.156%
🏆210.106%
🥰160.081%
💔130.066%
2 further kinds100.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,809reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2022 to 18 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Oct 2022, 03:49 UTC≈261,000 views3,711 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Sounds like Telegram is locking down the large accounts. "You can't really delete this channel without our express permission." This is suspicious af.

🤬2,110🤔745👍354💩163🤡9461🤯46🔥41

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 03:44 UTC≈250,000 views1,474 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Oh crap....

🤔913👍162🤯143💩69😱39🤡38🙏3326

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 03:44 UTC≈192,000 views1,326 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤔883😱145👍113💩39🤡38👎2625🥱18

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 03:19 UTC≈147,000 views691 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarkFinchemAZVideo

Went on Bannon's War Room to combat the latest lies from the election fraudsters. #AZSOS #AZGov #JustFollowTheLaw https://votefinchem.com/az-sos-candidate-mark-finchem-the-walls-are-closing-in-on-those-complicit-in-election-fraud/

421👍168🔥41🙏38🤡10🥱8🥰5

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 02:41 UTC≈114,000 views1,682 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @Jack_Posobiec

People big mad Candace started the convo about how Floyd died again

👍995🔥364😁17863🙏22🤡21🏆17👏17

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 02:30 UTC≈95,100 views1,508 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @Patri0tsareinContr0lVideo

Kash thinks AG Garland and the DOJ are blocking John Durham from bringing more indictments. However, he suggests that after we win the midterms, Durham could deliver bombshell testimony on Capitol Hill: “Hopefully John Durham has more prosecutions, but if he doesn’t, then it’s going to be a bombshell testimony scene the day he shows up at the Hill and explains to the American public WHY he didn’t prosecute the gover

🙏885🔥252👍161🤬62🤔40🤮34💩27👎21

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 01:32 UTC≈88,800 views1,645 reactionsread 15 August 2026

👆👆👆Massive and obvious narrative flip coming that even the sheep will balk at accepting after November 8. After 2 straight years of crowing that US elections are safe and secure, and that the 2020 election was the most safe and secure in US history.... After the Democrats and the RINOs and the cabal get their asses historically WIPED OUT in these midterm elections... guess what they're gonna do? They're all gonna

👍981💯387🤬82😁65🔥40👏22🤔22🤡19

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 01:26 UTC≈57,900 views666 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @KAGDrogoPhoto

All of a sudden WaPo and the FBI care about Chinese government hackers threatening our elections “Chinese government hackers are scanning U.S. political party domains ahead of next month’s midterm elections, looking for vulnerable systems as a potential precursor to hacking operations, and the FBI is making a big push to alert potential victims to batten down the hatches.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/20

🤬386🤡148👍101🥱136🙏5👏4🥰2

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 01:07 UTC≈53,700 views112 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @THUNDERDOMEDuaneCatesPhoto

SCENIC CHILL WITH THE GREYBEARD! FLYING THE ALPS IN THE CLASSIC DC-3! STRAP IN, CHAT & CHILLAX! Starts now! https://www.twitch.tv/duanecates

👍9416💩2

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 00:55 UTC≈44,600 views240 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @patelpatriot

🔥 Baseless Conspiracies - McCain in the Membraine🔥 Music starts at 10:15 PM EST Show starts at 10:30 PM EST Join Jon and Zak as they discuss the topics that the MSM labels us as baseless conspiracy theorists for. In this episode we will cover John McCain. https://rumble.com/v1oeiuu-baseless-conspiracies-2-mccain-in-the-membrane.html

🔥163👍69👎62

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 00:43 UTC≈45,400 views849 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁659🤡88🔥54👍3414

Signed Brian Cates

18 Oct 2022, 00:40 UTC≈43,600 views945 reactionsread 15 August 2026

The literal face of the J6 Committee is a neocon witch with no future in Congress who lost her last race by 35 pts in an epic wipeout. #ItsGoingToBeBiblical

😁742👍83👏46🔥42💩235💔3🙏1

Signed Brian Cates

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drawandstrikechannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 298,330 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Brian Cates ✪✪✪” (@drawandstrikechannel), 40,093 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drawandstrikechannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.