Channel

Qstradamus

@RealQstradamus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,928subscribers

-58 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001775082098
Type	Channel
Username	@RealQstradamus
Created	27 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	13 August 2026
Measurements held	9
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/RealQstradamus

Growth

9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,919–11,995 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
13 Aug 2026, 11:56	11,928	-4
12 Aug 2026, 09:56	11,932	-10
11 Aug 2026, 09:23	11,942	-11
10 Aug 2026, 07:46	11,953	-7
9 Aug 2026, 09:12	11,960	-5
8 Aug 2026, 10:57	11,965	-13
7 Aug 2026, 08:50	11,978	-8
6 Aug 2026, 10:06	11,986	no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:43	11,986	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime: 6m 00s
Average length: 3m 00s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,887 reactions across 20 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
🙏	2,123	30.8%
💯	1,884	27.4%
❤	1,413	20.5%
👍	510	7.41%
🔥	465	6.75%
⚡	132	1.92%
🤔	94	1.36%
👏	84	1.22%
😭	51	0.741%
❤‍🔥	26	0.378%
👀	20	0.29%
💔	19	0.276%
🤡	18	0.261%
👎	9	0.131%
🕊	9	0.131%
🤮	8	0.116%
😁	7	0.102%
🥰	3	0.044%
🥱	3	0.044%
💩	2	0.029%
5 further kinds	7	0.102%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,887reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2025 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Feb 2026, 15:40 UTC≈5,840 views391 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Trump is America first, but he cannot be America only. People will continue to panic every time he does anything, but he will also continue to be correct in the grand scheme of things. In the past, the notion of the US being the police of the world was a bad thing, but that's because they were using that as a guise to further their NWO agenda. We have the strongest military in the world by far and Trump is using it …

💯268🙏73❤20👍14🤡9🔥4👎3

25 Feb 2026, 02:51 UTC≈6,330 views403 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Trump is eviscerating the corrupt senators and judges right now and I'm so here for it

❤192💯137🔥21👍19🙏19❤‍🔥8👏7

22 Feb 2026, 19:25 UTC≈6,540 views123 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Here's my new article: Digital Age Crusade I hope you guys enjoy it and I would love to hear any comments you have! https://open.substack.com/pub/realqstradamus/p/digital-age-crusade?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=16kg8j

❤83👍23🙏9🔥5💯3

21 Feb 2026, 22:40 UTC≈5,200 views313 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Hey friends, just wanted to let you know I'm dropping a substack tomorrow and to look out for it! It's basically about where we're at right now with the great awakening, alongside many other thoughts I have on current happenings. It's been almost two years since I've written a substack and even longer since I've written one about the political landscape and Q so I'm excited to get this out there! Hope everyone is com…

❤209👍73🙏16👀10🔥4💯1

3 Feb 2026, 16:06 UTC≈6,440 views139 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Forwarded from @jordansather

Up to about 65 links of notable Epstein Files in this Substack article Shooting to have 100 in there by this evening https://jordansather.substack.com/p/running-list-of-highlights-in-the

🔥98👍19🙏9👏8❤3🙈2

2 Feb 2026, 18:07 UTC≈5,990 views328 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Well well the Epstein Files have shaken things up a bit, haven't they? Some of these files are dasting to say the least and people keep discovering more. The implications are beyond just that the elites are sick freaks, but exposing a lot of the inner workings of the deep state processes. We are at red pilling levels far beyond anything we've seen so far. There are a lot of truly retarded things being said by peopl…

⚡128🔥78💯72❤25👍16🙏4😁3🤡2

27 Jan 2026, 19:22 UTC≈19,100 views364 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The brainwashing is so powerful in America that they have somehow convinced the people to ignore inherent instincts like the importance of enforcing immigration laws. In basically any other country on Earth, no one would bat an eye if immigration officers were deporting criminals. You are a criminal if you enter this country illegally. The psyop is centered around radical empathy. It's a virtue signaling competition…

💯280🙏56❤18👍6🔥3🤨1

19 Dec 2025, 23:03 UTC≈6,700 views158 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Photo

JUST IN: 🇮🇱 Newly released documents show an IDF sweatshirt was found in the closet of Jeffrey Epstein. @BRICSNews

👍62🤔48🔥21👀10🤮6💯4🤡3💩2

22 Nov 2025, 15:19 UTC≈17,000 views526 reactionsread 13 August 2026

I rarely feel angry, especially when it comes to politics. Yesterday I spent some time scrolling Twitter and what I saw filled me with rage. I saw so many conservatives attacking Trump and other patriots that I know are on the side of truth. It's like a civil war over there.. The whole thing feels inorganic and nasty to me. I woke up today back in my right mind. The enemy wants to pull us down into the mud with them…

❤282🙏134💯79❤‍🔥13🔥10👍7🏆1

22 Nov 2025, 03:17 UTC≈6,900 views334 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Forwarded from @jordansather

If there was no "plan to save the world" going on we'd all be fuckin dead by now

💯262👏50👍15⚡4🤡3

17 Nov 2025, 15:38 UTC≈7,030 views337 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Forwarded from @Patri0tsareinContr0lVideo

I guess we’re supposed to forget that Trump was bringing up Epstein Island publicly before most people even knew who Epstein was. Candidate Trump, 2015: “I think [Bill Clinton]’s got a problem..that island was really a cesspool..Just ask Prince Andrew. He’ll tell you about it.” Why would Trump voluntarily put Epstein into the public consciousness if he had something to hide? Think logically. https://x.com/patri0t…

💯189👍112❤20🙏9🔥5🤡1😁1

17 Nov 2025, 15:34 UTC≈9,890 views396 reactionsread 13 August 2026

A lot of the truth movement, red pill conspiracy theorists, and conservatives have been turning on Trump. Why? Two subjects are at the forefront right now - Israel and the Epstein files. Let's be clear about something - the majority of people attacking Trump are only 'awake' because of Trump. Q stopped the NWO. If you do not have an understanding of Q or even an understanding of political theater then looking at Tr…

💯314❤40🙏26👍6🔥4🤔2🤮2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RealQstradamus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Jordan Sather
@jordansather · 48,5843 posts Patri0tsareinContr0l ⭐️⭐️⭐️
@Patri0tsareinContr0l · 20,4761 post ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter 🐸
@PepeMatter · 151,2291 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

BRICS News
@bricsnews · 152,7761 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Qstradamus” (@RealQstradamus), 11,928 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealQstradamus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.