Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Open Minds Inc. 💡

@OpenMindsInc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

600subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001319555792
TypeChannel
Username@OpenMindsInc
DescriptionTired of mass psychosis? Not much critical thinking in memes? Channels all being spammed by bite size information and are starting to look alike? This channel will bring sustenance to your mind and help you make sense of the world we live in.
Created31 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/OpenMindsInc

Growth

6007 Aug 2026, 00:34 — 600 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:47 — 600 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:347 Aug 2026, 00:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 599–601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 00:47600no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:34600first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 600 subscribers
Avg views / post
91.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held19 (11 March 202627 July 2026)
Views total182
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,500
Videos
1,590
Links
2,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1155.0%
👍210.0%
🤣210.0%
🤮210.0%
🤯210.0%
💯15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 21:05 UTC77 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GeopoliticsAndEmpire

Operation Gladio 2.0...they literally can't come up with new PSYOPS. https://t.me/disclosetv/21572

2 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC194 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @megatron_ronVideo

🇬🇧🏳️‍🌈 UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer: “Proud that we've got the gayest parliament. I don't think just at all times anywhere in the world, I don't think there's any parliament that is gayer than this parliament” @Megatron_ron

🤣1

29 May 2026, 21:22 UTC232 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @iaindavisVideo

Is it ironic, even hilarious perhaps, to now watch globalist shills like Tony Bliar backtracking on the climate scam now they realise they can't power their data centres with windmills and sunshine. It is certainly irksome, after years of being called a "climate denier," to hear leading climate change alarmists, like Bliar, use many of the same arguments put by those of us he personally vilified as "climate deniers"

🔥5

29 May 2026, 21:20 UTC169 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @geopolitics_primeVideo

💥💥💥 IMF and World Bank are 'designed to keep developing countries poor' — Economist Richard Werner goes further on the institutions themselves: the IMF/World Bank system was built to replicate British colonial extraction, not enable development. 🔶 The system functions to keep developing nations as cheap exporters of raw materials — structurally, not accidentally 🔶 Werner describes it as "the modern version of the

💯1

29 May 2026, 21:19 UTC118 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @offguardianPhoto

Best of OffG: A look at the “97.4% of climate scientists” meme Originally published February 2017, one of our earliest Climate Change articles. It tackles not only the broader narrative, but specifically one of most oft-quoted and misleading statistics on the internet. On 4 February, 2017 the Daily Mail published an article entitled: “World Leaders Duped by Manipulated Global Warming Data”. “…The Mail on Sunday to

5 May 2026, 07:43 UTC190 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @prophecyreconPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

28 Apr 2026, 16:25 UTC243 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @disclosetv

JUST IN - Google authorizes the U.S. War Department to use AI tools in classified environments, accelerating the Pentagon’s push to embed AI in its operations, following OpenAI and xAI signing similar agreements in recent weeks. Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/eoxtjwrspf/ @disclosetv

24 Apr 2026, 07:11 UTC203 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @unlimitedhangout

Palantir, a CIA front company, now has its tentacles in the food supply, our healthcare data, our growing autonomous weapons industry, the military, the entire US intelligence community, border patrol, Space Force and so on. Seemingly, Palantir is soon to become the testrun for Yarvins "sov-corp", a privatized version of govt that replaces the existing govt and is ruled by a CEO dictator. That is, unless we do somet

24 Apr 2026, 07:05 UTC140 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @inmagnaexcitatioPhoto

NYT: Just Steal https://archive.is/W94ZG

👍2

7 Apr 2026, 18:36 UTC183 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @iaindavis

If anyone has read my book this will make you laugh, you couldn't make this shit up. Check out Trumps new Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Established by Executive Order, no less. Co-chairs: David Sacks and Michael Kratsios The Neoreactionary accelerationists are: Marc Andreessen Sergey Brin Safra Catz Michael Dell Jacob DeWitte Fred Ehrsam Larry Ellison David Friedberg Jensen Huang John Martinis Bob

🤯1

27 Mar 2026, 19:51 UTC207 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @jayd0007

https://youtu.be/y3SDWwAwNY0?si=3XtS0ucbYyS674yc

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @OpenMindsInc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Open Minds Inc. 💡” (@OpenMindsInc), 600 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OpenMindsInc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.