Channel
@MarefatAlanwar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
266subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002081637779 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MarefatAlanwar |
| Description | بیان روایات از میان کتب مرجع علمای شیعه |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MarefatAlanwar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 266 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 266 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 20 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
33 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 9 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 24.2% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 21.2% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.06% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 3.03% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 3.03% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.03% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2025 to 11 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎥از آقای صادقی بپرسید این روایت مدعی را از کجا نقل می کند؟ در منابع چنین روایتی یافت نشده است. بر ایشان است که مستند مدعی خود را بیان کند متاسفانه با توجه به سابقه خراب ایشان در جعل روایت،منبع سخنان خود را باید بازگو کنند. #صادقی https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar
آیا توسّل به ذوالجناح مبنایی دارد؟! اولویت سلیقه من است یا اهل بیت علیهم السلام؟ https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar
#آداب_مداحی ❌ معضل جدید بدون شرح... https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar
👎2🔥1
🎙 «اعتراض کربلایی نریمان پناهی به شخصی که گفت: بر سر حوزه علمیه قم بنویسید کلب حیدر بشوی شیخ شدن لازم نیست. تو غلط میکنی، تو حلال و حرامت رو از فقهاء یاد گرفتی.» واکنش به غالیان کاشان در کفرخانهء دیوانگان توسط مادحین باعث می شود که این فرقهء منحوس از شیعه جدا شود و دامن شیعه از این کافران پاک باشد. جریان غالیِ نئو اخباری در پی جدایی هیئات از فقه و فقها است. #مداحی @BotShenasi
❤6
شایان جان هر از چند گاهی، وسط شادی و توپ بازی، یک گریزی هم به مسائل تاریخی، کلامی و فلسفی میزنند. 🔻در تازهترین اظهار نظر، ایشان اینگونه تقریر فرمودهاند که امام حسین(ع) قیامی انجام ندادهاند و صرفاً به دعوت کوفیان لبیک گفتهاند. 🔻در پاسخ به این سخنان نغز و پرمغز، از این علامه دهر سوالی میپرسیم. به نظر حضرتعالی کوفیان دقیقاً به چه علتی امام حسین(ع) را به کوفه دعوت کردند؟ لابد برای اینکه هدایت تیم فوتبال زیر بیست …
👍3👎3❤1
❌ به نحوی با یقین نقل میکند که گویی از روی یک منبع معتبر میخوانَد! (البته در بساط امام حسین علیه السّلام دخالت نکنید) https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar
🥴1😁1
کفر محض متولیان امر چه زمانی می خوان جلوی این کفرگویی های علنی را بگیرند. این جماعت لجباز با چه کسی لجبازی می کنند ؟ اینها اگر بدانند چه می گویند و از روی جهل نباشد اینها قطعاً شیعه نیستند و در جماعت غلات قرار می گیرند. قطعا کافرند و نجس هستند. برائت از این جماعت واجب است. #شیعه_از_غالی_بیزار_است. https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar
👍2👎1
حدیث از نظر سندی ضعیف است و این حشوی ها بدون در نظر گرفتن سند روایت مطلبی را ارائه می دهند و برای تضعیف عید قربان و فطر می کوشند. در حالی که این غم باید شامل غدیر هم بشود زیرا در غدیر حق را از صاحب آن غصب کردند و یادآوری آن باید اندوه دو چندان داشته باشد. https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar
👎2
🟥مطالب دیگر این سخنرانی منحرفانه که در پست قبلی نگنجید:👆👆👆👆👆 🟧اینکه این شخص تبه کار دروغگو مخاطبین را با این مطلب که من تنها دوست امیرالمومنین علیه السلام هستم به خودش در لفافه دعوت می کند اگر متوجه نشدید دوباره کلیپ را ببینید 🟨در جای دیگر باز به دروغ متوسل می شود و می گوید همان طور که امیرالمومنین علیه السلام در دامن رسول الله صلی علیه و آله به قول خودش تر و خشک شد بعدا هم خود رسول الله صلی الله علیه و آله توسط …
امیدواریم آقای مطهری توبه کرده باشند و بدرود حیات گفته باشند. https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar
👎1💩1🔥1
آقای تاجگردون نماینده مجلس هستند. شما نماینده ی مفت خور در چه حد سواد داری و مطالعه داری که میگی امیرالمومنین علیه السلام نتوانسته عدالت را کامل رعایت کنه؟ چرا نان تشیع را می خورید و این گونه به صاحب شیعه جسارت می کنید؟ کاش مسئولین یک برخوردی با این نادان مفت خور بکنند. اللهم عجل لولیک الفرج https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar
🤮3❤🔥1
🔵قابل توجه غلات و فریب خوردگان آنها: 🔷️عبداللَّه بن عباس گفت: پیامبر اکرم صلی اللَّه علیه و آله فرمود: وقتی مرا به آسمان هفتم بردند و از آنجا به سدرة المنتهی و از سدرة تا حجب نور، خداوند به من خطاب کرد: یا محمّد! تو بنده من و من پروردگار توام. نسبت به من خضوع داشته باش و مرا بپرست و بر من توکل کن و به من اعتماد نما. من تو را به بندگی و دوستی و رسالت و نبوت برگزیدم و برادرت علی را خلیفه و درب به سوی من. او حجت من بر م…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MarefatAlanwar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 243,620 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معرفة الانوار” (@MarefatAlanwar), 266 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarefatAlanwar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.