11 Dec 2025, 10:36 UTC78 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vmanaberPhoto
تزویج اباحه گری توسط شایان مصلح نئو اخباری منکر شریعت @Vmanaber
🤬5👏3
Channel
نامصلح
@namosleh1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
86subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001682038873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @namosleh1 |
| Description | رسوایی غالیِ صوفی مسلک با پوشش اخباریگری |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/namosleh1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 86 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 86 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 2 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 66
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 51s
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
118 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 65 | 55.1% | |
| 👎 | 23 | 19.5% | |
| 🤣 | 17 | 14.4% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 4.24% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2024 to 11 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
30 Jan 2025, 12:02 UTC453 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sarabe_akhbarigariPhoto
تمثال مبارک یکی از محدثین و راویان احادیث اهلبیت، در سفری معنوی به قصد سماع حدیث، از راویان بلده طیبه مالدیو. در کتب ارباب تراجم مذکور است که ماحصل این سفر مبارک اثر، روایاتی بود بی مانند و بی مثل که اثری از آثار آن در مولفات علمای سلف و خلف رویت نشده است. گفتنی است که در بعضی از تذکره اینگونه نقل شده است که حضرت شایان الدین در این سفر، در وصف چشمان شهلای یکی از راویان احادیث اهلبیت، چکامهای مرقوم فرمودند به غا…
🤣16👎3🗿1
29 Jan 2025, 10:24 UTC≈4,630 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo
یکی از مفت خور ترین اقشار جامعه فوتبالیست ها هستند که پول حرام بیت المال را می خورند و به ریش مردم بیچاره می خندند. عقاید شیعه را مگر تو ابله بلد هستی؟ روایات مورد ادعا هم عمومات است اما تو احمق که هر را از بر تشخیص نمی دهی، می گویی نص روایت یعنی روایتی که دال بر شهادت حضرت زینب است. وقتی هنوز فرق عمومات با نص را تشخیص نمی دهی دهان پر از فاضلابت را باز نکن.
👍15👎5🔥1
25 Jan 2025, 02:19 UTC500 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vmanaberVideo
اسم هیات حیدریون را باید کذابیون اصفهان نامید. هر چه دروغ می خواهند به اهل بیت نسبت می دهند. به این کذاب توپ شوت کن بگویید نص کدام روایت فرموده که حضرت زینب شهیده است؟ @Vmanaber
👎5👍2😁1
22 Jan 2025, 12:52 UTC306 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarefatAlanwar
سلام و احترام متاسفانه نقد های ما و تعداد کم اعضا باعث شده است که تلگرام به ما هشدار مسدودی کانال را بدهد لذا خواهشمندیم در دیگر کانال عضو شوید: https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar
21 Jan 2025, 19:49 UTC457 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File
انگار محمد بن مسلم زمان، مومن طاق ثانی، بزرگ محدثین عصر که دائم می گوید بقیه بیسوادند و من یکه باسواد و حدیث خوان عالمم به احادیثی دسترسی دارد که دیگران ۱۴۰۰ سال است از آن بی خبرند و به یک باره ایشان دسترسی پیدا کرده است و در آن روایات آمده که حضرت زینب شهیده است. حال از ایشان بپرسید نص کدام روایات فرموده است؟ جالب اینجاست که ابابصیر دوران می گوید خدا در خلقت امیرالمومنین متحیر است. این یونس بن عبدالرحمان زمان که در …
👍2👎2
15 Jan 2025, 18:40 UTC≈2,370 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo
نص کدام روایت؟ آیه تطهیر چه ارتباطی با حضرت زینب دارد؟ به مدعی روایت خوانی بگویید که این روایات را نشان دهد تا ۵۰۰ میلیون شیعه را از جهل خارج کند.
👍4👎2🤣1
12 Nov 2024, 13:37 UTC370 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vmanaber
https://t.me/sarabe_akhbarigari/140 https://t.me/sarabe_akhbarigari/458 https://t.me/sarabe_akhbarigari/171 https://t.me/sarabe_akhbarigari/146 https://t.me/sarabe_akhbarigari/502 https://t.me/sarabe_akhbarigari/488 https://t.me/sarabe_akhbarigari/469
👍4
12 Nov 2024, 13:37 UTC522 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sarabe_akhbarigari
از سه حال خارج نیست: حالت اول: آقای شایان مصلح، استرآبادی را یکی از معصومین میداند و به کلام او، به عنوان یک روایت استناد کرده است. در این حالت ما با شخصی مواجه هستیم که خارج از دایره اسلام و تشیع تعریف میشود و گفتگو با او درباره جزئیات دین و مذهب، محض اتلاف وقت است. حالت دوم: آقای شایان مصلح، استرآبادی را به عنوان مرجع تقلید خود برگزیده است و تعبداً به اجتهاد او ملتزم گردیده است. در این حالت نیز ما با یک فرد …
👍5❤1
12 Nov 2024, 13:37 UTC527 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vmanaberPhoto
از ثانیِ ابوبصیر، مومن طاق دوران،از بزرگ محدثین جهان تشیع در همه ادوار سوال داریم که روایت تقدس اسب های اهل بیت و ملعون بودن منکرینش را منتشر کند تا عالم تشیع را از جهل به این عقیده مهم خارج کند. @Vmanaber
👍4
12 Nov 2024, 13:37 UTC345 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vmanaberPhoto
استرآبادی فیلسوف را چه بفهم روایات؟ جالب است که هم فیض کاشانی و هم استرآبادی دل باخته مکتب فلاسفه بودند و رگه هایی از تصوف در کلمات استرآبادی و بسیار پررنگ در آثار فیض کاشانی دیده می شود. اما روز سومی هست که اسلام بیچاره شد، آن هم روزی که ماتحت نشسته ای که هرّ از برّ تشخیص نمی دهد و یک توپ شوت کن است اعاظم این مذهب را کنار ابوبکر و عمرقرار میدهد. @Vmanaber
👍6
4 Nov 2024, 09:35 UTC563 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo
یه روز تو یک مسئله ای دخالت نکرد،مُرد. مثل رائفی پور دقیقا
👍8👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @namosleh1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,214,409 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نامصلح” (@namosleh1), 86 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/namosleh1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.