Channel

نقد سخنرانان

@vmanaber

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,772subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002054779374
Type	Channel
Username	@vmanaber
Created	Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	9 August 2026
Last confirmed live	13 August 2026
Measurements held	3
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/vmanaber

Growth

3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,771–1,772 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
13 Aug 2026, 07:44	1,772	+1
10 Aug 2026, 09:51	1,771	no change
9 Aug 2026, 16:18	1,771	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime: 26m 12s
Average length: 1m 27s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

277 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👎	74	26.7%
👍	56	20.2%
❤	46	16.6%
🤬	42	15.2%
😁	11	3.97%
🥴	10	3.61%
🤣	7	2.53%
😐	6	2.17%
🤮	4	1.44%
🤯	4	1.44%
🔥	3	1.08%
🤔	3	1.08%
🥰	3	1.08%
👀	2	0.722%
😢	2	0.722%
👌	1	0.361%
🖕	1	0.361%
🙏	1	0.361%
🤨	1	0.361%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 277reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2025 to 12 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Dec 2025, 20:17 UTC≈2,010 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @botshenasiVideo

🎥 تحریف روایت و تغییر آن! بشار مُکاری وقتی آمد حضرت در جلسه درس نبود بلکه حضرت رطب میل می فرمودند. دَخَلْتُ عَلَی أَبِی عَبْدِ اللَّهِ علیه السلام بِالْکُوفَةِ وَ قَدْ قُدِّمَ لَهُ طَبَقُ رُطَبِ طَبَرْزَدٍ وَ هُوَ یَأْکُلُ [بحارالانوار - جلد ۹۷، صفحه ۴۴۱] این اولین دروغ شماست.خانمی که زمین خورد به سنگ بزرگ نخورد و اصلا صحبت از زمین خوردن نیست. رَأَیْتُ جِلْوَازاً یَضْرِبُ رَأْسَ امْرَأَةٍ یَسُوقُهَا إِلَی الْحَبْ…

❤5

8 Dec 2025, 19:24 UTC≈2,580 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Photo

تزویج اباحه گری توسط شایان مصلح نئو اخباری منکر شریعت @Vmanaber

🤬16👎3👍2❤1🖕1

28 Oct 2025, 14:26 UTC≈3,220 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @marefat_al_anwarVideo

این منحرف مقام حضرت زینب سلام الله علیها را از امیرالمومنین علیه السلام بالاتر می برد. و ادعا میکند کسی می تواند در آن واحد انسان را در حالت ممات و حیات قرار دهد که صاحب ولایت کلیه باشد و حضرت زینب سلام الله علیها از نظر ایشان تنها کسی که می تواند این کار را بکنند. چه کسی گفتند و طبق چه روایتی و چه اعتقادی حضرت زینب صاحب ولایت کلیه است؟!!!! در حین اینکه امیرالمومنین علیه السلام به زعم ایشان صاحب ولایت کلیه نیست که ف…

🤬5❤2

23 Oct 2025, 13:59 UTC≈3,210 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Video

🔻روایت مذکور در هیچ یک از مصادر و منابع شیعه و غیر شیعه نقل نشده است و نامعتبر بودن آن از واضحات است. 🔻ظاهر این است که این روایت برای اولین بار در کتاب "اسرار الشهاده" ملای دربندی(1286ق) نقل شده است. مرحوم دربندی اما روایت مذکور را به کتاب خاصی ارجاع نداده و در کلامی عجیب بیان کرده است که روایت فوق را از برخی اشخاص مورد اعتماد شنیده و ایشان نیز از برخی اشخاص دیگر.(اسرار الشهادة، ص 339) #احمدی_اصفهانی @Vmanaber

❤5👍1👎1🤨1😐1

23 Sept 2025, 14:13 UTC≈3,250 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @botshenasiVideo

🎥کفرگویی در دیوانگان کاشان تمامی ندارد! عبادت مخصوص خداوند است و برای غیر خدا شرک است و هیچ روایتی ما را به عبادت اهل بیت علیهم السلام دعوت نکرده است و این از خزعبلات گوینده بیسواد دنبال مرید است. ادعای الوهیت و خالقیت امیرالمومنین علیه السلام خلاف صریح روایات متواتر است و با جعل حدیث نمی توان این روایات را انکار کرد. متاسفانه مسلک این عمامه به سر کذب،کفر،تضعیف تشیع است و هیچکس هم نیست که بر آنها نظارت کند. #مزروع…

🤬12❤4🤯3👎2👍1

11 Sept 2025, 18:25 UTC≈3,100 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @marefat_al_anwarVideo

🎥از آقای صادقی بپرسید این روایت مدعی را از کجا نقل می کند؟ در منابع چنین روایتی یافت نشده است. بر ایشان است که مستند مدعی خود را بیان کند متاسفانه با توجه به سابقه خراب ایشان در جعل روایت،منبع سخنان خود را باید بازگو کنند. #صادقی https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar

😐4❤3👍1👎1🔥1🤬1

2 Sept 2025, 20:12 UTC≈2,930 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @botshenasiVideo

مجید شجاعی در مطالبه حضوری به جای ارائه منبع، چنین پاسخ داد: «من الآن شام نخوردم! ... اصلاً فکر کن من سند ندارم! ... بگویید شجاعی کذاب است! ... ما داریم برای عمر و ابوبکر و عثمان کار می‌کنیم!! ... » #شجاعی #مطالبه @BotShenasi

🤣6🤬6🤮3👀2😁1

20 Aug 2025, 22:19 UTC≈3,620 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Video

نه تنها «دعنه فإنه ممسوس في الله» برای حضرت علی اکبر ، تحریف متأخر است؛ بلکه اساساً اصل «علي ممسوس في ذات الله» برای امیرالمؤمنین نیز حاصل تصحیف است و اساسی ندارد #حسن_قاسمی @Vmanaber

👎12👍6❤4🤔1🙏1

27 Jul 2025, 09:55 UTC≈3,800 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026

File

🎙 «اعتراض کربلایی نریمان پناهی به شخصی که گفت: بر سر حوزه علمیه قم بنویسید کلب حیدر بشوی شیخ شدن لازم نیست. تو غلط می‌کنی، تو حلال و حرامت رو از فقهاء یاد گرفتی.» واکنش به غالیان کاشان در کفرخانهء دیوانگان توسط مادحین باعث می شود که این فرقهء منحوس از شیعه جدا شود و دامن شیعه از این کافران پاک باشد. جریان غالیِ نئو اخباری در پی جدایی هیئات از فقه و فقها است.‌ #مداحی @BotShenasi

👍19❤5👎3😁2👌1

13 Jun 2025, 05:58 UTC≈3,960 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @marefat_al_anwarVideo

کفر محض متولیان امر چه زمانی می خوان جلوی این کفرگویی های علنی را بگیرند. این جماعت لجباز با چه کسی لجبازی می کنند ؟ اینها اگر بدانند چه می گویند و از روی جهل نباشد اینها قطعاً شیعه نیستند و در جماعت غلات قرار می گیرند. قطعا کافرند و نجس هستند. برائت از این جماعت واجب است. #شیعه_از_غالی_بیزار_است. https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar

❤3🥰3🔥2👎1🤯1

6 Jun 2025, 12:41 UTC≈3,730 views46 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @marefat_al_anwarVideo

این آقا باعث دین گریزی جوونا میشه آخه نخودکی صوفی کسیه که ازش نقل قول کنی؟! در خود شرع مقدس اسلام و فقه پویای تشیع انسان خواب تکلیف نداره اگر کسی خواب موند گناهی براش نیست اون قضا شدنی گناهه که بیدار باشی و نخونی امثال این آقایان مردم رو دین گریز میکنن https://t.me/marefat_al_anwar

👎37👍6❤2🤮1

10 May 2025, 17:52 UTC≈4,250 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @marefat_al_anwarVideo

🔴لازم است به چند نکته برجسته ی منحرفانه که در سخنرانی این شخص معلوم الحال خودعالم پندار که الان در قید حیات نیست و از شاگردان احمد نجفی بوده و چون الان مریدانی دارد و به حرفهایش معتقدند اشاره کنم البته اراجیف ایشان توسط مریدانش در حال نشر است. 🟨یک اینکه بالا بردن جناب قنبر رضوان الله تعالی علیه از مقام حضرت موسی علیه السلام که هم دروغ گفت هم در حق جناب قنبر رضوان الله علیه غلو کرد و هم به حضرت موسی علیه السلام تو…

❤1🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vmanaber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 758,579 of 1,176,613entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

نامصلح
@namosleh1 · 865 posts

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

معرفه الانوار
@marefat_al_anwar · 5576 posts 🏴بُت شِناسی🏴
@botshenasi · 11,6825 posts

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

نامصلح
@namosleh1 · 864 posts

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

🏴بُت شِناسی🏴
@botshenasi · 11,6827 posts معرفه الانوار
@marefat_al_anwar · 5575 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نقد سخنرانان” (@vmanaber), 1,772 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vmanaber.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.