کانال ۱۲ اسرائیل: به نظر میرسد خلبانان در کابین خلبان با یکدیگر درگیر شده و یکدیگر را زدهاند؛ سپس کدی را فعال کردهاند که نشاندهنده ربوده شدن هواپیماست. / انتخاب ✅️ @ir_ruoz

Channel
اخبار روز
@ir_ruoz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,671subscribers
-1,153 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001718230318 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ir_ruoz |
| Description | اخبار روز و تحولات منطقه و جهان 🔻تبلیغات شبکه خبر🔻 @khabaar_tablighat5 آیدی ادمین ✅ @m_drg_khabaar |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ir_ruoz |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 34,671 | -138 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 34,809 | -59 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 34,868 | -37 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 34,905 | -37 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 34,942 | -46 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 34,988 | -35 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 35,023 | -64 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 35,087 | -40 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 35,127 | -32 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 35,159 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:47 | 35,167 | -24 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 35,191 | -22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:59 | 35,213 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 35,230 | -26 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 35,256 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 35,273 | -27 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 35,300 | -22 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 35,322 | -43 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 35,365 | -43 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 35,408 | first reading |
Engagement
1,720 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.611%
- avg views ÷ 34,671 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 212
- 798 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.614%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 798
- of 1,720 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 166 of 798 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,720 (7 August 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 169,038 |
| Reactions total | 269 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈30,500
- Videos
- ≈24,900
- Links
- ≈936
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4h 52m
- Average length
- 1m 02s
Measured directly from 281 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
307 reactions across 178 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 104 | 33.9% | |
| 👎 | 45 | 14.7% | |
| 🤮 | 36 | 11.7% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 10.4% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 6.84% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 6.19% | |
| 🤬 | 13 | 4.23% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 2.28% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 1.63% | |
| 😡 | 5 | 1.63% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.977% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.977% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.977% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.651% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.326% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.326% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.326% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.326% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.326% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.326% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.977% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 203 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
فلایترادار: هواپیمای «فلایدبی» که از دبی عازم اسرائیل بود، در فرودگاه تبوک عربستان سعودی فرود آمد. / انتخاب ✅️ @ir_ruoz
کاتال ۱۲ اسرائیل: به نظر میرسد این حادثه مربوط به هواپیماربایی نیست هواپیما با مقامهای سعودی تماس برقرار کرده و انتظار میرود حدود ۱۰ دقیقه دیگر در این کشور فرود بیاید. / انتخاب ✅️ @ir_ruoz
کانال ۱۲ اسرائیل: برآوردهای نهادهای امنیتی اسرائیل حاکی از آن است که هواپیمای «فلایدبی» در عربستان سعودی فرود خواهد آمد. / انتخاب ✅️ @ir_ruoz
کانال ۱۲ اسرائیل: هنگامی که هواپیما حدود یک ساعت و نیم با فرود در اسرائیل فاصله داشت، ابتدا کد اضطراری عمومی را فعال کرد و سپس کد ۷۵۰۰ مربوط به «مداخله غیرقانونی» را ارسال کرد که کد مورد استفاده برای هواپیماربایی است. از آن زمان تاکنون هیچ تماسی با هواپیما برقرار نشده است. این حادثه در اسرائیل حدود نیم ساعت است که در جریان قرار گرفته است. / انتخاب ✅️ @ir_ruoz
بورس تهران وارد کانال ۷.۷ میلیون واحد شد 😉 @ir_ruoz
رسانه های اسراییل: حدود ۱۵۰ مسافر اسرائیلی در هواپیمای احتمالا ربوده شده شرکت هوایی فلای دبی به مقصد تل آویو حضور دارند. ✅️ @ir_ruoz
🚨کانال ۱۲ اسرائیل در مورد هواپیمای بوئینگ ۷۳۷ فلای دبی: خلبان کد مربوط به ربوده شدن هواپیما را ارسال کرده است، شماری از اسرائیلیها در این پرواز حضور دارند. این هواپیما دیگر در اپلیکیشن رهگیری پرواز Flightradar نیز نمایش داده نمیشود. / انتخاب ✅️ @ir_ruoz
کانال ۱۲ اسرائیل: مقامهای اسرائیلی ارتباط خود را با یک فروند بوئینگ ۷۳۷ فلایدبی از دست دادهاند و اسرائیل در حال بررسی احتمال هواپیماربایی این هواپیماست. جنگندههای نیروی هوایی اسرائیل برای رهگیری این هواپیما به پرواز درآمدهاند. / انتخاب ✅️ @ir_ruoz
فلایت رادار: یک فروند هواپیمای مسافربری بوئینگ ۷۳۷ شرکت فلایدبی که از دبی به مقصد تلآویو در پرواز بود، پس از آنکه برای مدت کوتاهی کد اضطراری ۷۷۰۰ و سپس کد ۷۵۰۰ مربوط به احتمال هواپیماربایی را مخابره کرد، اکنون در حال بازگشت و تغییر مسیر به سمت دبی است. / انتخاب ✅️ @ir_ruoz
توقف واردات خودروهای لوکس با دستور رئیسجمهور 🔸وزیر صنعت، معدن و تجارت اعلام کرده است که بر اساس دستور رئیسجمهور، واردات خودروهای لوکس متوقف شده و این تصمیم شامل خودروهایی که قرار بود توسط ایرانیان مقیم خارج از کشور وارد شوند نیز میشود. 🔸یکی از مهمترین انتقادها به واردات این خودروها، میزان بالای ارزبری آنها بود. 🔸منتقدان معتقد بودند ورود خودروهای گرانقیمت میتواند تقاضا برای ارز را افزایش دهد و در شرایط محدودی…
🎥 علی آقامحمدی: جریاناتی در محلات استقرار پیدا کردهاند تا عملیاتهای ترور انجام دهند ✅️ @ir_ruoz
🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,720 posts we hold for @ir_ruoz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@majaleh_bedanim · 135,521#1
@ettelaatdrug · 97,803#2
@DanestaniPedia · 48,865#3
@Mealniandachannel · 600 (as read 2 September 2026)#4
@tthewthatff · 467#5
@bahar79abdi · 246 (as read 2 September 2026)#6
@gharib_deltaang · 650#7
@khande_torie · 201#8
@Nabtoryss · 603 (as read 2 September 2026)#9
@shadmehreman · 1,775#10
@TEXBSARI · 200#11
@Film_news · 40,947#12
@hangul_tv · 2,596#13
@akhabarfouri_ir · 255,306#14
@Airrdrop_news · 41,754#15
@gorani_kurdi_20 · 1,630#16
@akhbare_Airrdrop · 3,745#17
@fffuckingbulshitt · 344 (as read 2 September 2026)#18
@deja_Vu_98 · 206 (as read 2 September 2026)#19
@emam_hasan_mojtaba1388 · 156#20
@Shaghaf133 · 83#21
@guilty_pleasure_chanel · 84#22
@amirar0bi · 479#23
@roshananemehr · 534#24
@alconnasha · 529#25
@pinterestt2024 · 649#26
@Dar_Bande_Hossein · 601#27
@my_collection_of_song · 356 (as read 2 September 2026)#28
@akhbar_mahvelat · 1,419#29
@samaherasad · 264#30
@shobeirnajafi · 821#31
@Tabrizmountain · 887#32
@musiluck · 933 (as read 2 September 2026)#33
@azarbonabdagchilari · 593#34
@iiacopera · 1,775#35
@faryadsoocoot · 838#36
@conceptualimage · 1,089#37
@gamomran_channel · 2,046#38
@alihadaf · 4,877#39
@arabimedia · 1,190#40
@IR_CoinEX · 2,249#41
@khayyamarchitectureuniversity · 1,279#42
@myDeepSeed · 524 (as read 2 September 2026)#43
@rezvan_shekarchi · 563#44
@illmah_bakhtiyarii · 888 (as read 2 September 2026)#45
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DanestaniPedia · 48,865
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 25 August 2026
@ettelaatdrug · 97,803
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 August 2026
@majaleh_bedanim · 135,521
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
@english_prism · 39,214
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار روز” (@ir_ruoz), 34,671 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ir_ruoz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.