Channel
@irtimes_world
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,259subscribers
-80 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001241282710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irtimes_world |
| Created | 8 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irtimes_world |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 8,259 | -25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 8,284 | -27 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 8,311 | -18 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 8,329 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 8,339 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 8,339 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
67 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 41.8% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 20.9% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 17.9% | |
| 🤬 | 9 | 13.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.99% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴امارات حمله به آب شیرینکن ایران را تکذیب کرد 🔸️امارات متحده عربی گزارشها درباره «حمله به کارخانه آبشیرینکن در ایران» را تکذیب کرد 🔸️ رئیس کمیته دفاع ملی امارات : اخبار جعلی است. امارات چنین کاری انجام نمی دهد. @iran_times
❤8😁8👍1👎1🤬1
🔴 ارتش اسرائیل اعلام کرد که به هیچ تأسیسات آب شیرین کن حمله نکرده است. همچنین امارات هم به جراوزالم پست گفته که به تأسیسات آب شیرین کن در ایران حمله نکرده است. @iran_times
❤6🤬2
🔴فوری| کانال ۱۲ اسرائیل: 🔸️الی کوهن، وزیر انرژی اسرائیل، هشدار داد که در صورت ادامه حملات ایران به پالایشگاهها، زیرساختهای انرژی ایران ممکن است هدف قرار گیرد و گفت: «پالایشگاههای نفت و نیروگاههای تولید برق اهداف بالقوه هستند». @iran_times
👎6❤4
🔴فوری | سیانان، به نقل از یک مقام دولت ترامپ: 🔸️ما طی ۳ هفته آینده به حمله به اهداف زیادی در ایران ادامه خواهیم داد. @iran_times
❤5🤬3
🔴به ادعای رسانه های اسرائیلی، در حمله شب گذشته به هتلی در بیروت، چهار مقام ارشد نیروی قدس سپاه ایران با موفقیت ترور شده اند: 🔸️رئیس بخش مالی سپاه لبنان – مجید حسینی 🔸️رئیس اطلاعات سپاه لبنان – علی بی آزار 🔸️ رئیس اداره اطلاعات سپاه فلسطین – احمد رسولی 🔸️مسئول پرونده «صهیونیسم» در سپاه لبنان – حسین احمدلو @iran_times
👏2🤬2
🔴 منابع خبری اسرائیلی میگویند امارات علیه ایران عملیات تلافیجویانه انجام داده است. اما تا این لحظه امارات و منابع جریان اصلی رسانهای در این خصوص اظهار نظری نکردهاند. @iran_times
🔴امارات : ایران به ما بیشتر از اسرائیل حمله می کند 🔸️امارات متحده عربی اعلام کرد که ایران با ۴۲.۸٪ از کل حملات (۱۲۷۶+) که بیش از دو برابر ۲۰.۱٪ اسرائیل (حدود ۶۰۰ حمله) است، بیشترین حملات را به امارات متحده عربی انجام داده است. 🔸️کویت با ۱۶.۸٪ (حدود ۵۰۰ حمله) در رتبههای بعدی قرار دارد، در حالی که بحرین (۶.۶٪) و عربستان سعودی (۵.۴٪) سهم کمتری از تقریباً ۲۹۸۱ حمله ثبت شده را تشکیل میدهند. @iran_times
🔴وزیر امور خارجه اسرائیل: 🔸️تغییر رژیم در ایران بدون اقدام مردم ایران و سپس حمایت خارجی محقق نخواهد شد. @iran_times
❤2👎1
🔴ترامپ در مصاحبهای با شبکه خبری سیبیاس نیوز درباره تهدیدهای علی لاریجانی گفت: 🔸️«من اصلاً نمیدانم او درباره چه چیزی صحبت میکند، او کیست. برایم مهم نیست.» و افزود که لاریجانی «از قبل شکست خورده است.» @iran_times
😁3❤2
🔴بلومبرگ: 🔸️ماریا کورینا ماچادو، رهبر مخالفان ونزوئلا، برای حفظ نفوذ خود، به طور خصوصی با ترامپ در کاخ سفید دیدار کرد. @iran_times
🔴هواپیمایی قطر: 🔸️پس از تأیید ایجاد یک کریدور عملیاتی محدود، پروازهای محدودی را به مقصد و از مبدا دوحه انجام میدهیم. @iran_times
🔴وزارت دفاع امارات متحده عربی: 🔸️امروز ما ۱۷ موشک بالستیک را رصد و ۱۶ فروند از آنها را منهدم کردیم. 🔸️همچنین ۱۱۷ پهپاد را رصد و ۱۱۳ فروند را رهگیری کردیم و ۴ فروند از آنها به دریا سقوط کردند. @iran_times
😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @irtimes_world. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 8,460 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ایران تایمز - جهان” (@irtimes_world), 8,259 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irtimes_world.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.