NOXA 데브(0xd...660)가 디뱅크체인에 20이더치 유동성을 추가했습니닷 계속해서 뭔가 상호작용이 있긴하네요. https://scan.dbkchain.io/tx/0x51fe9d12dfbf3deeb45cf83d3fa2d01dfb324fdc5ecae392f5fb77609c0fbfbd

Channel
HyTorch의 무덤(방장취준중)
@hytorchP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
597subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003128350940 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hytorchP |
| Description | 채팅방 : t.me/hytorchc 트위터: https://x.com/hytorch 문의 : @HyTorch |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hytorchP |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 597 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 597 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 46.2%
- avg views ÷ 597 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 276
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (31 May 2026 – 14 July 2026) |
| Views total | 276 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 269
- Videos
- 8
- Links
- 157
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
스타링크도? 통째로 해킹당한건가? 일단 죽ㄷㅓ라도 드간다 라고하고들어갈라했는데 0원되있노 ㅋㅋㅋ
로빈후드 밈코불장으로 수혜 단단히 받고있는 noxa.fun 일일 수익이 약 $2M으로 펌펀의 2배~3배가량 나오는중 그래서 NOXA가 예전에 발행한 본토큰이 다시 주목받기 시작했는데 NOXA토큰 발행량은 100만개인데 그 중 40만개는 소각주소에 들어가 있음 가격은 여기에서 https://noxascreener.netlify.app/ 특이한게 디뱅크체인에 있는데 구매하는 방법이 궁금하시면 NA님의 루트를 참고해주세여 https://t.me/btcbullforever/50468
하리가 넘사벽인 EU. 로빈후드 본진 밈코인인 CASHCAT선물 관련해서 라이터는 로빈후드 체인과 통합했다는것과 하리보다 더 빨리 상장했다는 메리트를 가지고도 발끝에도 못미치는중. 24h Volume: $13.3M vs $53.62K OI : $6M vs $120K 호가 : 0.7% vs 2%
vex 출발하나요 ㄷㄷ 0x8Ff92566f2e81BDd68EDfAa8cde73942A723796b
🧡 BASED에 포지션 트래킹기능 추가와 함께 에디슨형님 10만불로 공개 트레이딩한다고 합니다. https://app.based.one/track/0xc580a53ff4c64ad458b138d9aa884230de782bd7
🧡$BASED TGE 초기에 2.5M개의 토큰을 받아 점프트레이딩으로 옮겼던 지갑이 오늘 5M개의 토큰을 팀으로부터 추가로 수령했습니다. 점프트레이딩은 여러개의 거래소에 나누어 입출금을 반복하는것으로 보아 $BASED의 패시브 MM역할을 수행중인것으로 추정됩니다.
🟢 $0.12 @basedprice
하리 고대 NFT Tinyhypercats 트위터 해킹당했네요 연결하지 마십쉬다
미순털 박스 열으래요 경험상 헐레벌레 제일 먼저열었다가 안좋은것 만 나오는 것 같아서 조금만 기다렸다 깔래요
🧡BASED 보쓰 에디슨 코베 CEO랑 점심한끼 하셨다네요 마이무라
하리에서는 USDC사용으로 생태계 외부로 유출되는 가치가 막심해서(작년기준 연 2억달러가량) USDH를 도입하려했었음. USDC에서 USDH에 버금가는 생태계 환원을 약속했기에 USDH로 전환을 포기함. Jeff는 하리에 이득이 되는 방향이면 바로바로 피봇하는 인물이란걸 알 수 있음 이런 흐름에 따라 quote자산을 USDH로해서 네이티브도르로 "우리꺼 써줘" 하던 HIP-3들은 티커가 겹치고 XYZ에게 상대도 안되니 접는수순. vHYPE 스테이킹이 50만개 미만이 되면서 출금이 막히자 퍼드가 돌면서 vHYPE의 페깅이 깨졌지만, 출금지연일뿐 HYPE은 그대로 스테이킹 되어있으니(상환 능력 있음) HYPE을 장기보유 할 생각이 있고 ventuals가 러그치지 않을거라 생각했다면 매수 해볼만한 기회. 결론적으로 해당 공지대로 제공이 되…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hytorchP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 716,614 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HyTorch의 무덤(방장취준중)” (@hytorchP), 597 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hytorchP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.